Anaerobic digestion of agricultural wastes and comparison between conventional and automated biochemical methane potential performance

IF 4.6 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
María de Lourdes Mendoza, Luis Vaca, Sebastián Taco-Vasquez, Pablo Villa
{"title":"Anaerobic digestion of agricultural wastes and comparison between conventional and automated biochemical methane potential performance","authors":"María de Lourdes Mendoza,&nbsp;Luis Vaca,&nbsp;Sebastián Taco-Vasquez,&nbsp;Pablo Villa","doi":"10.1016/j.bcab.2026.104259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biogas potential assessment of organic waste is an interesting practice exploited to enhance sustainable energy recovery while mitigating the environmental burdens associated with waste disposal. However, there are still some incongruences regarding the method's accuracy. The biogas potential of four agro-wastes, <em>i.e.</em>, banana peel, banana pulp, cocoa, and coffee mucilages, via the conventional and automated method, was established, and the characteristics between them were determined. The highest biogas yield was observed with the automated and the conventional methods under continuous mixing, which were roughly 27% higher than those obtained with the conventional method under intermittent mixing. Among the substrates, the most significant biogas production was recorded for coffee (1067 mL·g<sub>TVS</sub><sup>−1</sup>), followed by cocoa mucilage (748 mL·g<sub>TVS</sub><sup>−1</sup>). The biogas collection values from the automated method were similar to those from the stirred method, but the automated method showed earlier stabilized methane formation. For cocoa mucilage, the time to reach 80% of the maximum biogas (T<sub>80</sub>) was the shortest, denoting its fast hydrolysis in fermentation. An apparent biodegradability index was estimated by relating the experimental biogas volume (L<sub>experimental biogas</sub> per g <sub>digested TVS</sub>) to the theoretical biogas potential of the substrate’s volatile solids (L<sub>theoretical biogas</sub> per g <sub>digested TVS</sub>), with coffee mucilage identified as the most apparently biodegradable biomass.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8774,"journal":{"name":"Biocatalysis and agricultural biotechnology","volume":"77 ","pages":"Article 104259"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biocatalysis and agricultural biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878818126003427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biogas potential assessment of organic waste is an interesting practice exploited to enhance sustainable energy recovery while mitigating the environmental burdens associated with waste disposal. However, there are still some incongruences regarding the method's accuracy. The biogas potential of four agro-wastes, i.e., banana peel, banana pulp, cocoa, and coffee mucilages, via the conventional and automated method, was established, and the characteristics between them were determined. The highest biogas yield was observed with the automated and the conventional methods under continuous mixing, which were roughly 27% higher than those obtained with the conventional method under intermittent mixing. Among the substrates, the most significant biogas production was recorded for coffee (1067 mL·gTVS−1), followed by cocoa mucilage (748 mL·gTVS−1). The biogas collection values from the automated method were similar to those from the stirred method, but the automated method showed earlier stabilized methane formation. For cocoa mucilage, the time to reach 80% of the maximum biogas (T80) was the shortest, denoting its fast hydrolysis in fermentation. An apparent biodegradability index was estimated by relating the experimental biogas volume (Lexperimental biogas per g digested TVS) to the theoretical biogas potential of the substrate’s volatile solids (Ltheoretical biogas per g digested TVS), with coffee mucilage identified as the most apparently biodegradable biomass.
农业废弃物厌氧消化及常规生化与自动化生化甲烷潜能性能比较
有机废物的沼气潜力评估是一项有趣的实践,旨在加强可持续能源回收,同时减轻与废物处理相关的环境负担。然而,该方法的准确性仍存在一些不一致之处。采用常规法和自动化法对香蕉皮、香蕉浆、可可和咖啡胶浆4种农业废弃物的沼气潜力进行了测定,并比较了它们之间的特性。连续混合条件下,自动化和常规方法的沼气产量最高,比间歇混合条件下的常规方法的沼气产量高出约27%。在基质中,咖啡的沼气产量最高(1067 mL·gTVS−1),其次是可可粘液(748 mL·gTVS−1)。自动化方法的沼气收集值与搅拌法相似,但自动化方法的甲烷生成稳定时间更早。可可胶达到最大沼气量80% (T80)的时间最短,说明其在发酵过程中水解速度快。通过将实验沼气量(每g消化TVS的实验沼气量)与基质挥发性固体的理论沼气潜力(每g消化TVS的理论沼气量)相关联,估计了表观生物降解指数,其中咖啡粘液被确定为最明显的生物降解生物质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biocatalysis and agricultural biotechnology
Biocatalysis and agricultural biotechnology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
2.50%
发文量
308
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology is the official journal of the International Society of Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology (ISBAB). The journal publishes high quality articles especially in the science and technology of biocatalysis, bioprocesses, agricultural biotechnology, biomedical biotechnology, and, if appropriate, from other related areas of biotechnology. The journal will publish peer-reviewed basic and applied research papers, authoritative reviews, and feature articles. The scope of the journal encompasses the research, industrial, and commercial aspects of biotechnology, including the areas of: biocatalysis; bioprocesses; food and agriculture; genetic engineering; molecular biology; healthcare and pharmaceuticals; biofuels; genomics; nanotechnology; environment and biodiversity; and bioremediation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书