A Semi-Interpretable Multimodal Model Combining Electronic Health Records and Chest X-Rays for COVID-19-Related Death Prediction

IF 3.4 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Expert Systems Pub Date : 2026-09-26 DOI:10.1111/exsy.70440
Lander Rodriguez-Idiazabal, Jose M. Quintana, Javier Del Ser, Jose Javier Echevarria-Uraga, Maria Jose Legarreta, Nere Larrea, Fernando García-García, Irantzu Barrio
{"title":"A Semi-Interpretable Multimodal Model Combining Electronic Health Records and Chest X-Rays for COVID-19-Related Death Prediction","authors":"Lander Rodriguez-Idiazabal,&nbsp;Jose M. Quintana,&nbsp;Javier Del Ser,&nbsp;Jose Javier Echevarria-Uraga,&nbsp;Maria Jose Legarreta,&nbsp;Nere Larrea,&nbsp;Fernando García-García,&nbsp;Irantzu Barrio","doi":"10.1111/exsy.70440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Prognostic models can benefit from integrating heterogeneous data sources. While deep learning-based multimodal models often improve predictive performance, their limited interpretability remains a barrier to clinical adoption. Moreover, achieving robust generalization with such models typically requires large and diverse datasets, which are not always available in clinical research. This study evaluated whether a late fusion model combining traditional statistical approaches with deep learning models could rival deep learning-only multimodal models while preserving interpretability to support clinical use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study of 965 hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent frontal chest X-ray imaging during hospitalization between March 2020 and January 2022. Of these, 64 (6.6%) died. Structured clinical data and chest X-ray images were used to predict COVID-19-related death. We developed unimodal baseline models and two multimodal approaches: a deep learning-based joint fusion model and a late fusion model leveraging logistic regression to combine predictions from the best-performing models for every data modality. Given the limited sample size and class imbalance, performance was evaluated using repeated five-fold cross validation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The late fusion model achieved the best overall performance, with the highest median test AUPRC of 0.363 (IQR 0.271–0.384) across cross validation folds, outperforming unimodal baselines based on structured clinical data or images alone. The late fusion model also outperformed the joint fusion model, achieving, respectively, a 3.1% and 3.6% relative improvement in AUPRC and Brier score on pooled out-of-sample predictions and yielding the highest balanced F1-score. Moreover, it preserved partial interpretability by linking predictions to clinically meaningful variables such as age and comorbidities and enabling image-based predictions to be traced back to radiographic abnormalities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Late fusion models integrating statistical models for clinical data with deep learning for image classification can enhance prognostic performance over unimodal models without fully sacrificing interpretability. In settings with limited data, they may also outperform deep learning-based joint fusion models. These findings support late fusion as a promising strategy that warrants prospective evaluation and external validation before clinical implementation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51053,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems","volume":"43 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/exsy.70440","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/exsy.70440","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Prognostic models can benefit from integrating heterogeneous data sources. While deep learning-based multimodal models often improve predictive performance, their limited interpretability remains a barrier to clinical adoption. Moreover, achieving robust generalization with such models typically requires large and diverse datasets, which are not always available in clinical research. This study evaluated whether a late fusion model combining traditional statistical approaches with deep learning models could rival deep learning-only multimodal models while preserving interpretability to support clinical use.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study of 965 hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent frontal chest X-ray imaging during hospitalization between March 2020 and January 2022. Of these, 64 (6.6%) died. Structured clinical data and chest X-ray images were used to predict COVID-19-related death. We developed unimodal baseline models and two multimodal approaches: a deep learning-based joint fusion model and a late fusion model leveraging logistic regression to combine predictions from the best-performing models for every data modality. Given the limited sample size and class imbalance, performance was evaluated using repeated five-fold cross validation.

Results

The late fusion model achieved the best overall performance, with the highest median test AUPRC of 0.363 (IQR 0.271–0.384) across cross validation folds, outperforming unimodal baselines based on structured clinical data or images alone. The late fusion model also outperformed the joint fusion model, achieving, respectively, a 3.1% and 3.6% relative improvement in AUPRC and Brier score on pooled out-of-sample predictions and yielding the highest balanced F1-score. Moreover, it preserved partial interpretability by linking predictions to clinically meaningful variables such as age and comorbidities and enabling image-based predictions to be traced back to radiographic abnormalities.

Conclusions

Late fusion models integrating statistical models for clinical data with deep learning for image classification can enhance prognostic performance over unimodal models without fully sacrificing interpretability. In settings with limited data, they may also outperform deep learning-based joint fusion models. These findings support late fusion as a promising strategy that warrants prospective evaluation and external validation before clinical implementation.

结合电子健康记录和胸部x射线的半可解释多模态模型用于covid -19相关死亡预测
目的整合异构数据源有助于建立预后模型。虽然基于深度学习的多模态模型通常可以提高预测性能,但其有限的可解释性仍然是临床应用的障碍。此外,使用这些模型实现稳健的泛化通常需要大量不同的数据集,而这些数据集在临床研究中并不总是可用的。本研究评估了将传统统计方法与深度学习模型相结合的后期融合模型是否可以与仅深度学习的多模态模型相媲美,同时保持可解释性以支持临床使用。方法对2020年3月至2022年1月住院期间接受胸部正面x线成像的965例实验室确诊的SARS-CoV-2感染患者进行回顾性单中心队列研究。其中64例(6.6%)死亡。结构化临床数据和胸部x线图像用于预测covid -19相关死亡。我们开发了单峰基线模型和两种多峰方法:一种基于深度学习的联合融合模型和一种利用逻辑回归的后期融合模型,该模型将来自每种数据模态的最佳模型的预测结合起来。考虑到有限的样本量和类别不平衡,使用重复的五倍交叉验证来评估性能。结果晚期融合模型获得了最佳的综合性能,交叉验证折叠的中位测试AUPRC最高为0.363 (IQR 0.271-0.384),优于基于结构化临床数据或单独图像的单峰基线。晚期融合模型也优于联合融合模型,在汇总样本外预测中AUPRC和Brier评分分别相对提高3.1%和3.6%,并产生最高的平衡f1评分。此外,它通过将预测与临床有意义的变量(如年龄和合并症)联系起来,并使基于图像的预测能够追溯到放射学异常,从而保留了部分可解释性。结论晚期融合模型将临床数据的统计模型与图像分类的深度学习相结合,可以在不牺牲可解释性的情况下提高单峰模型的预后性能。在数据有限的情况下,它们也可能优于基于深度学习的关节融合模型。这些发现支持晚期融合作为一种有前景的策略,在临床实施前需要进行前瞻性评估和外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Systems
Expert Systems 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
266
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems: The Journal of Knowledge Engineering publishes papers dealing with all aspects of knowledge engineering, including individual methods and techniques in knowledge acquisition and representation, and their application in the construction of systems – including expert systems – based thereon. Detailed scientific evaluation is an essential part of any paper. As well as traditional application areas, such as Software and Requirements Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction, and Artificial Intelligence, we are aiming at the new and growing markets for these technologies, such as Business, Economy, Market Research, and Medical and Health Care. The shift towards this new focus will be marked by a series of special issues covering hot and emergent topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书