The Legislative Rationale of the Charter of the League of Arab States and Its Implications for Effective Arab Crisis Management

IF 1.7 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Mohammad Nasr Khater, Marya Ahmad Aldhoun, Majd Almanasra, Hanan Hashim Ameer
{"title":"The Legislative Rationale of the Charter of the League of Arab States and Its Implications for Effective Arab Crisis Management","authors":"Mohammad Nasr Khater,&nbsp;Marya Ahmad Aldhoun,&nbsp;Majd Almanasra,&nbsp;Hanan Hashim Ameer","doi":"10.1002/pa.70159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article offers a doctrinal analysis of the Charter of the League of Arab States to identify its legislative rationale and assess the consequences of that rationale for Arab crisis management. It argues that the Charter was designed in the geopolitical conditions of late colonialism and contested independence to reconcile Arab solidarity with the preservation of state sovereignty through a coordination-based, rather than supranational, institutional model. Using treaty interpretation grounded in the Charter's text, context, object and purpose, and read alongside the Alexandria Protocol, early legal commentary, subsequent institutional practice, and selective comparisons with the United Nations, the African Union, the Gulf Cooperation Council, and the European Union, the article reconstructs the Charter's normative architecture and tests its operational effects. It shows that the Charter enables consultation, mediation, and collective political coordination, yet limits compulsory decision-making, structured implementation, and authoritative legal review. The case studies of Kuwait-Iraq (1961), Yemen (1972), Syria (2011), and Gaza (2023) demonstrate that the League performs more effectively where a crisis fits the Charter's interstate and sovereignty-protective categories, but less effectively where crises are internal, humanitarian, or politically divisive. The article therefore rejects both a purely political explanation of institutional weakness and a legal-determinist account. Political will and legal design are mutually conditioning: the Charter channels state preferences, but its operation still depends on sustained member-state support. The article concludes with a calibrated reform agenda that preserves sovereign equality while differentiating voting rules, strengthening implementation and early-warning functions, structuring dispute settlement, and establishing an Arab Court of Justice under Article 19.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Affairs","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.70159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article offers a doctrinal analysis of the Charter of the League of Arab States to identify its legislative rationale and assess the consequences of that rationale for Arab crisis management. It argues that the Charter was designed in the geopolitical conditions of late colonialism and contested independence to reconcile Arab solidarity with the preservation of state sovereignty through a coordination-based, rather than supranational, institutional model. Using treaty interpretation grounded in the Charter's text, context, object and purpose, and read alongside the Alexandria Protocol, early legal commentary, subsequent institutional practice, and selective comparisons with the United Nations, the African Union, the Gulf Cooperation Council, and the European Union, the article reconstructs the Charter's normative architecture and tests its operational effects. It shows that the Charter enables consultation, mediation, and collective political coordination, yet limits compulsory decision-making, structured implementation, and authoritative legal review. The case studies of Kuwait-Iraq (1961), Yemen (1972), Syria (2011), and Gaza (2023) demonstrate that the League performs more effectively where a crisis fits the Charter's interstate and sovereignty-protective categories, but less effectively where crises are internal, humanitarian, or politically divisive. The article therefore rejects both a purely political explanation of institutional weakness and a legal-determinist account. Political will and legal design are mutually conditioning: the Charter channels state preferences, but its operation still depends on sustained member-state support. The article concludes with a calibrated reform agenda that preserves sovereign equality while differentiating voting rules, strengthening implementation and early-warning functions, structuring dispute settlement, and establishing an Arab Court of Justice under Article 19.

《阿拉伯国家联盟宪章》的立法依据及其对有效的阿拉伯危机管理的影响
本文对《阿拉伯国家联盟宪章》进行了理论分析,以确定其立法依据,并评估该依据对阿拉伯危机管理的影响。它认为,《宪章》是在殖民主义晚期和有争议的独立的地缘政治条件下设计的,目的是通过基于协调而不是超国家的制度模式,调和阿拉伯国家的团结与维护国家主权之间的关系。本文以《宪章》的文本、背景、目标和宗旨为基础,结合《亚历山大议定书》、早期法律评论、随后的制度实践,以及与联合国、非洲联盟、海湾合作委员会和欧盟的选择性比较,对《宪章》的规范架构进行了重构,并对其运作效果进行了检验。这表明,《宪章》允许协商、调解和集体政治协调,但限制了强制性决策、结构化执行和权威法律审查。对科威特-伊拉克(1961年)、也门(1972年)、叙利亚(2011年)和加沙(2023年)的案例研究表明,在危机符合《宪章》的国家间和主权保护类别的情况下,国际联盟的表现更为有效,但在危机属于国内、人道主义或政治分裂的情况下,国际联盟的表现就不那么有效了。因此,本文既反对对制度缺陷的纯政治解释,也反对法律决定论的解释。政治意愿和法律设计是相互制约的:《宪章》引导了国家的偏好,但其运作仍然依赖于成员国的持续支持。文章最后提出了一个经过校准的改革议程,在保留主权平等的同时,区分投票规则,加强实施和预警功能,构建争端解决机制,并根据第19条建立阿拉伯法院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Affairs
Journal of Public Affairs PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Affairs provides an international forum for refereed papers, case studies and reviews on the latest developments, practice and thinking in government relations, public affairs, and political marketing. The Journal is guided by the twin objectives of publishing submissions of the utmost relevance to the day-to-day practice of communication specialists, and promoting the highest standards of intellectual rigour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书