Cleaning Efficacy and Surface Alterations of Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments Following Mechanical Instrumentation: An In Vitro Study

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Marina Salah Kamel, Axel Spahr, Tim Badgery‐Parker, Tihana Divnić‐Resnik
{"title":"Cleaning Efficacy and Surface Alterations of Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments Following Mechanical Instrumentation: An In Vitro Study","authors":"Marina Salah Kamel, Axel Spahr, Tim Badgery‐Parker, Tihana Divnić‐Resnik","doi":"10.1111/clr.70182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To evaluate the cleaning efficacy, quantitative and qualitative surface modifications of titanium (Ti) and zirconia (Zr) abutments following instrumentation with twelve mechanical instrumentation modalities. Materials and Methods Twenty‐four Ti and twenty‐four Zr abutments were divided by marginal grooves into 36 test and 12 control surfaces per material. Test abutments were mounted in a custom peri‐implant mucositis model and treated in triplicate with twelve modalities: glycine (GPAP) and erythritol (EPAP‐5 s and 20 s) air‐polishing; prophylaxis cup with paste; plastic, titanium and stainless‐steel (SS) curettes; and titanium, polyether‐ether‐ketone (PEEK) sonic, PEEK ultrasonic, SS sonic and SS ultrasonic tips. Post‐treatment analyses included stereomicroscopy, vertical scanning interferometry (VSI), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDS). Results Air‐polishing was associated with a favourable combination of high cleaning efficacy and preserved native surface morphology. SEM and VSI analyses revealed scratching, gouging and material loss on titanium abutments following instrumentation with metallic devices, whereas EPAP preserved surface morphology. Zirconia abutments demonstrated minimal topographical disruption across most modalities; however, surface residues and material smearing were detected following nearly all treatments except EPAP. EDS analyses identified elemental surface transfer on zirconia abutments following instrumentation with stainless‐steel and titanium instruments. Conclusion All mechanical instrumentation modalities altered titanium and zirconia surfaces to varying degrees. On titanium, EPAP was associated with a favourable combination of high cleaning efficacy and preserved native surface morphology. On zirconia, both air‐polishing modalities achieved high cleaning efficacy with minimal topographical alteration.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"226 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70182","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the cleaning efficacy, quantitative and qualitative surface modifications of titanium (Ti) and zirconia (Zr) abutments following instrumentation with twelve mechanical instrumentation modalities. Materials and Methods Twenty‐four Ti and twenty‐four Zr abutments were divided by marginal grooves into 36 test and 12 control surfaces per material. Test abutments were mounted in a custom peri‐implant mucositis model and treated in triplicate with twelve modalities: glycine (GPAP) and erythritol (EPAP‐5 s and 20 s) air‐polishing; prophylaxis cup with paste; plastic, titanium and stainless‐steel (SS) curettes; and titanium, polyether‐ether‐ketone (PEEK) sonic, PEEK ultrasonic, SS sonic and SS ultrasonic tips. Post‐treatment analyses included stereomicroscopy, vertical scanning interferometry (VSI), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDS). Results Air‐polishing was associated with a favourable combination of high cleaning efficacy and preserved native surface morphology. SEM and VSI analyses revealed scratching, gouging and material loss on titanium abutments following instrumentation with metallic devices, whereas EPAP preserved surface morphology. Zirconia abutments demonstrated minimal topographical disruption across most modalities; however, surface residues and material smearing were detected following nearly all treatments except EPAP. EDS analyses identified elemental surface transfer on zirconia abutments following instrumentation with stainless‐steel and titanium instruments. Conclusion All mechanical instrumentation modalities altered titanium and zirconia surfaces to varying degrees. On titanium, EPAP was associated with a favourable combination of high cleaning efficacy and preserved native surface morphology. On zirconia, both air‐polishing modalities achieved high cleaning efficacy with minimal topographical alteration.
钛和氧化锆种植体基台在机械仪器后的清洁效果和表面变化:一项体外研究
目的评价钛(Ti)和氧化锆(Zr)基台在12种机械仪器方式下的清洁效果、定量和定性表面修饰。材料与方法24个钛基台和24个锆基台被边缘凹槽划分为36个测试面和12个控制面。测试基台安装在定制的种植体周围粘膜炎模型中,并使用十二种方式进行三次处理:甘氨酸(GPAP)和赤藓糖醇(EPAP - 5 s和20 s)空气抛光;带浆糊的预防杯;塑料、钛和不锈钢(SS)管;以及钛、聚醚醚酮(PEEK)超声波、PEEK超声波、SS超声波和SS超声波头。处理后分析包括立体显微镜、垂直扫描干涉测量(VSI)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和能量色散X射线光谱(EDS)。结果空气抛光具有高清洁效率和保持表面形态的良好结合。SEM和VSI分析显示,在使用金属装置进行仪器检测后,钛基台会出现划伤、凿削和材料损失,而EPAP则保留了表面形貌。氧化锆基台在大多数模式下表现出最小的地形破坏;然而,除EPAP外,几乎所有处理后都检测到表面残留和材料涂抹。EDS分析发现,在使用不锈钢和钛仪器后,氧化锆基台上元素表面转移。结论各种机械仪器方式对氧化钛和氧化锆表面均有不同程度的改变。在钛上,EPAP具有高清洁效率和保留天然表面形态的良好组合。在氧化锆上,两种空气抛光方式在最小的地形变化下都达到了很高的清洁效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.60%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书