Conspicuity and characterization of pre-selected hypodense hepatic lesions in pancreatic cancer patients: limited clinical value of dual-energy portal phase CT.

IF 2.2
Riccardo De Robertis, Silvia Fiorese, Nicolò Cardobi, Laura Logiudice, Calogero Cicero, Mirko D'Onofrio
{"title":"Conspicuity and characterization of pre-selected hypodense hepatic lesions in pancreatic cancer patients: limited clinical value of dual-energy portal phase CT.","authors":"Riccardo De Robertis, Silvia Fiorese, Nicolò Cardobi, Laura Logiudice, Calogero Cicero, Mirko D'Onofrio","doi":"10.1007/s00261-026-05802-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the impact of 50-keV virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) and iodine metrics on conspicuity and characterization of hypodense hepatic lesions in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients undergoing dual-energy portal phase CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with hypodense hepatic lesions who underwent dual-energy portal phase CT between January and December 2025 were retrospectively identified. Lesions were pre-selected by a resident. Two radiologists independently evaluated blended and 50-keV VMIs for lesion conspicuity and confidence for metastasis using 5-point Likert scales. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and iodine metrics were calculated. Subjective scores and CNRs were compared using the Wilcoxon test. Diagnostic performance for characterization was assessed using histopathology and/or imaging as the reference standard. Iodine metrics were compared using non-parametric tests. Subgroup analyses included lesions ≤ 10 mm and those in steatotic livers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>181 lesions in 86 patients were included (58% metastases). Interobserver agreement was good/very good, except for diagnostic confidence in steatotic livers (k = 0.58/0.48). No differences were found between image sets in subjective conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, or characterization performance. Metastases had higher CNR on 50-keV VMIs than on blended images in the overall cohort (9.9 ± 5.7 vs. 8.5 ± 5.3, p < 0.001) and for lesions ≤ 10 mm (9.5 ± 5.1 vs. 8 ± 4, p = 0.003), but not in steatotic livers. Iodine metrics were higher in metastases than in cysts, with substantial overlap with non-cystic benign lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>50-keV VMIs improve objective conspicuity but not subjective conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, or characterization performance. Iodine metrics provide complementary information but cannot distinguish metastases from non-cystic benign lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520541,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal radiology (New York)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal radiology (New York)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-026-05802-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the impact of 50-keV virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) and iodine metrics on conspicuity and characterization of hypodense hepatic lesions in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients undergoing dual-energy portal phase CT.

Methods: Consecutive patients with hypodense hepatic lesions who underwent dual-energy portal phase CT between January and December 2025 were retrospectively identified. Lesions were pre-selected by a resident. Two radiologists independently evaluated blended and 50-keV VMIs for lesion conspicuity and confidence for metastasis using 5-point Likert scales. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and iodine metrics were calculated. Subjective scores and CNRs were compared using the Wilcoxon test. Diagnostic performance for characterization was assessed using histopathology and/or imaging as the reference standard. Iodine metrics were compared using non-parametric tests. Subgroup analyses included lesions ≤ 10 mm and those in steatotic livers.

Results: 181 lesions in 86 patients were included (58% metastases). Interobserver agreement was good/very good, except for diagnostic confidence in steatotic livers (k = 0.58/0.48). No differences were found between image sets in subjective conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, or characterization performance. Metastases had higher CNR on 50-keV VMIs than on blended images in the overall cohort (9.9 ± 5.7 vs. 8.5 ± 5.3, p < 0.001) and for lesions ≤ 10 mm (9.5 ± 5.1 vs. 8 ± 4, p = 0.003), but not in steatotic livers. Iodine metrics were higher in metastases than in cysts, with substantial overlap with non-cystic benign lesions.

Conclusion: 50-keV VMIs improve objective conspicuity but not subjective conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, or characterization performance. Iodine metrics provide complementary information but cannot distinguish metastases from non-cystic benign lesions.

胰腺癌患者预先选择的低密度肝脏病变的显著性和特征:双能门脉期CT的有限临床价值。
目的:评价50kev虚拟单能图像(VMIs)和碘指标对胰管腺癌(PDAC)患者行双能门脉期CT检查时低密度肝脏病变的显著性和特征的影响。方法:回顾性分析2025年1月至12月连续行双能门脉期CT检查的低密度肝病变患者。病变由住院医师预先选择。两名放射科医生独立评估混合vmi和50 kev vmi的病变显著性和转移置信度,使用5点李克特量表。计算噪声对比比(CNR)和碘指标。主观评分和cnr采用Wilcoxon检验进行比较。以组织病理学和/或影像学作为参考标准评估表征的诊断性能。采用非参数检验比较碘指标。亚组分析包括病变≤10 mm和脂肪变性肝。结果:86例患者的181个病灶被纳入研究,其中58%为转移灶。除了对脂肪肝的诊断置信度(k = 0.58/0.48)外,观察者间的一致性为好/非常好。图像集之间在主观显著性、诊断置信度或特征表现方面没有发现差异。在整个队列中,50-keV VMIs的转移灶CNR高于混合图像(9.9±5.7 vs. 8.5±5.3,p)。结论:50-keV VMIs可改善客观显著性,但不能改善主观显著性、诊断置信度或表征表现。碘指标提供了补充信息,但不能区分转移和非囊性良性病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书