Semiochemical inhibitors for protecting conifers from bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the Western United States: research, development, and application.

IF 3.7 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Frontiers in insect science Pub Date : 2026-09-10 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/finsc.2026.1939049
Christopher J Fettig, Jackson P Audley
{"title":"Semiochemical inhibitors for protecting conifers from bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the Western United States: research, development, and application.","authors":"Christopher J Fettig, Jackson P Audley","doi":"10.3389/finsc.2026.1939049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the western U.S., the research, development and application (RD&A) of semiochemical inhibitors for protecting conifers from bark beetles has focused on antiaggregation pheromones and, to a lesser extent, nonhost volatiles. The sequence begins with identifying potential inhibitors by searching relevant literature; sampling the volatile profiles of bark beetle extracts, frass, infested host materials, hosts, nonhosts, and the forest environment; and/or conducting gas chromatographic-electroantennographic detection analyses of bark beetle antennae. Promising inhibitors are then evaluated for levels of inhibition in trapping and tree protection assays under field conditions. Additional assays are required to refine inhibitors and to inform the spacing and distribution of release devices. Factors affecting levels of tree protection include (a) the population density of the target bark beetle species, (b) forest structure and composition, (c) variability in bark beetle responses to inhibitors, (d) the stereochemistry and chemical stability of inhibitors in the forest environment, (e) release rates of inhibitors, (f) strength of inhibition, (g) zone of inhibition, and (h) the presence of other stressors and disturbances. Once an inhibitor has been successfully developed, there are substantial costs and data requirements associated with registration. The commercial availability of inhibitors for protecting conifers from bark beetles is limited but evidence suggests there are favorable benefit-to-cost returns to be realized with additional investments in RD&A. Opportunities include (a) developing new (or better) inhibitors, inhibitory blends, and formulations, (b) automating (e.g., via unmanned aerial vehicles) and optimizing applications of inhibitors in the field, (c) developing cheaper and more efficient means of synthesizing inhibitors, (d) streamlining regulatory processes and incentivizing RD&A to expedite the commercial availability of products, and (e) integrating inhibitors with other management tactics. We review recent advances in the use of inhibitors for western pine beetle, <i>Dendroctonus brevicomis</i> LeConte, southwestern pine beetle, <i>D</i>. <i>barberi</i> Hopkins, mountain pine beetle, <i>D</i>. <i>ponderosae</i> Hopkins, Douglas-fir beetle, <i>D</i>. <i>pseudotsugae</i> Hopkins, spruce beetle, <i>D</i>. <i>rufipennis</i> (Kirby), northern spruce engraver, <i>Ips perturbatus</i> (Eichhoff), and pine engraver, <i>I</i>. <i>pini</i> (Say). Research on these and other bark beetles has informed the RD&A of inhibitors for other forest and agricultural pests.</p>","PeriodicalId":517424,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in insect science","volume":"6 ","pages":"1939049"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13601950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in insect science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2026.1939049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the western U.S., the research, development and application (RD&A) of semiochemical inhibitors for protecting conifers from bark beetles has focused on antiaggregation pheromones and, to a lesser extent, nonhost volatiles. The sequence begins with identifying potential inhibitors by searching relevant literature; sampling the volatile profiles of bark beetle extracts, frass, infested host materials, hosts, nonhosts, and the forest environment; and/or conducting gas chromatographic-electroantennographic detection analyses of bark beetle antennae. Promising inhibitors are then evaluated for levels of inhibition in trapping and tree protection assays under field conditions. Additional assays are required to refine inhibitors and to inform the spacing and distribution of release devices. Factors affecting levels of tree protection include (a) the population density of the target bark beetle species, (b) forest structure and composition, (c) variability in bark beetle responses to inhibitors, (d) the stereochemistry and chemical stability of inhibitors in the forest environment, (e) release rates of inhibitors, (f) strength of inhibition, (g) zone of inhibition, and (h) the presence of other stressors and disturbances. Once an inhibitor has been successfully developed, there are substantial costs and data requirements associated with registration. The commercial availability of inhibitors for protecting conifers from bark beetles is limited but evidence suggests there are favorable benefit-to-cost returns to be realized with additional investments in RD&A. Opportunities include (a) developing new (or better) inhibitors, inhibitory blends, and formulations, (b) automating (e.g., via unmanned aerial vehicles) and optimizing applications of inhibitors in the field, (c) developing cheaper and more efficient means of synthesizing inhibitors, (d) streamlining regulatory processes and incentivizing RD&A to expedite the commercial availability of products, and (e) integrating inhibitors with other management tactics. We review recent advances in the use of inhibitors for western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis LeConte, southwestern pine beetle, D. barberi Hopkins, mountain pine beetle, D. ponderosae Hopkins, Douglas-fir beetle, D. pseudotsugae Hopkins, spruce beetle, D. rufipennis (Kirby), northern spruce engraver, Ips perturbatus (Eichhoff), and pine engraver, I. pini (Say). Research on these and other bark beetles has informed the RD&A of inhibitors for other forest and agricultural pests.

保护美国西部针叶树免受树皮甲虫(鞘翅目:瓢虫科)侵害的符号化学抑制剂:研究、开发和应用。
在美国西部,用于保护针叶树免受树皮甲虫侵害的符号化学抑制剂的研究、开发和应用(RD&A)主要集中在抗聚集信息素和较小程度上的非寄主挥发物上。该序列首先通过搜索相关文献来识别潜在的抑制剂;对树皮甲虫提取物、杂草、被侵染的寄主材料、寄主、非寄主和森林环境的挥发性特征进行采样;和/或对树皮甲虫触角进行气相色谱-触角电检测分析。然后在现场条件下评估有希望的抑制剂在诱捕和树木保护试验中的抑制水平。需要额外的测定来改进抑制剂,并告知释放装置的间距和分布。影响树木保护水平的因素包括(a)目标树皮甲虫种类的种群密度,(b)森林结构和组成,(c)树皮甲虫对抑制剂反应的可变性,(d)抑制剂在森林环境中的立体化学和化学稳定性,(e)抑制剂的释放率,(f)抑制强度,(g)抑制区,以及(h)其他应激源和干扰的存在。一旦一种抑制剂被成功开发,就会有大量的成本和注册相关的数据要求。用于保护针叶树免受树皮甲虫侵害的抑制剂的商业可用性有限,但有证据表明,通过额外的研发投资,可以实现良好的成本效益回报。机会包括:(a)开发新的(或更好的)抑制剂、抑制剂混合物和配方,(b)自动化(例如,通过无人机)和优化抑制剂在该领域的应用,(c)开发更便宜和更有效的合成抑制剂的方法,(d)简化监管流程和激励研发和开发,以加快产品的商业可用性,以及(e)将抑制剂与其他管理策略整合。我们回顾了近年来在西部松甲虫,Dendroctonus brevicomis LeConte,西南松甲虫,D. barberi Hopkins,山松甲虫,D. ponderosae Hopkins, Douglas-fir甲虫,D. pseudosugae Hopkins,云杉甲虫,D. rufipennis (Kirby),北方云杉雕刻,Ips perturbatus (Eichhoff)和松树雕刻,I. pini (Say)中使用抑制剂的进展。对这些和其他树皮甲虫的研究为其他森林和农业害虫抑制剂的研发提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书