Auwal Ibrahim Tanko, Md Rashedul Islam, Muhammad Afzal, Misbahuddin Rafeeq, Hussam Aly Sayed Murad, Sami I Alzarea, Rabeea Mustafa Ali Daoub, Hisham N Altayb, Muhammad Shahid Nadeem, Imran Kazmi
{"title":"Therapeutic Potential of Protein-Based Polymers as Nanocarriers for Drug Delivery.","authors":"Auwal Ibrahim Tanko, Md Rashedul Islam, Muhammad Afzal, Misbahuddin Rafeeq, Hussam Aly Sayed Murad, Sami I Alzarea, Rabeea Mustafa Ali Daoub, Hisham N Altayb, Muhammad Shahid Nadeem, Imran Kazmi","doi":"10.2174/0115672018496503260910072814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objective: </strong>Protein-based polymeric nanocarriers are increasingly being investigated as biodegradable, biocompatible systems for drug and gene delivery. This review critically examines major protein-based polymeric nanocarriers and globular proteins, including casein, gelatin, gliadin, collagen, elastin, albumin, silk fibroin, lectins, legumin, ferritin, zein, virus-like particles, silk-like polypeptides, elastin-like polypeptides, and silk-elastin-like protein polymers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant studies were identified from major scientific databases using search terms related to protein-based polymeric nanocarriers, drug delivery, protein nanoparticle, recombinant protein polymer, ferritin nanocages, and virus-like particles. Studies were considered if they discussed carrier design, formulation methods, physicochemical characterization, biological performance, clinical translation, patents, or recent developments in protein-based delivery systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Protein-based polymeric nanocarriers can be classified into five main structural classes: protein nanoparticles, protein micelles, protein nanocages, recombinant protein polymer assemblies, and protein-drug conjugate or fusion systems. Albumin-based nanoparticles remain the most clinically advanced platform, whereas ferritin nanocages and virus-like particles provide structurally defined systems for receptor-mediated targeting. Plant-derived proteins such as casein, zein, and gliadin form polymeric matrices relevant for oral delivery, whereas silk fibroin, collagen, gelatin, and recombinant protein polymers self-assemble into structures that support sustained, local, and stimulus-responsive delivery.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite their potential, protein-based polymeric nanocarriers face several challenges, including protein corona formation, immunogenicity, storage instability, batch variability, scale-up limitations, and regulatory uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future development should prioritize reproducible manufacturing, safer surface modification, improved stability, and rigorous evaluation of immune responses and translational feasibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":94287,"journal":{"name":"Current drug delivery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672018496503260910072814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction/objective: Protein-based polymeric nanocarriers are increasingly being investigated as biodegradable, biocompatible systems for drug and gene delivery. This review critically examines major protein-based polymeric nanocarriers and globular proteins, including casein, gelatin, gliadin, collagen, elastin, albumin, silk fibroin, lectins, legumin, ferritin, zein, virus-like particles, silk-like polypeptides, elastin-like polypeptides, and silk-elastin-like protein polymers.
Methods: Relevant studies were identified from major scientific databases using search terms related to protein-based polymeric nanocarriers, drug delivery, protein nanoparticle, recombinant protein polymer, ferritin nanocages, and virus-like particles. Studies were considered if they discussed carrier design, formulation methods, physicochemical characterization, biological performance, clinical translation, patents, or recent developments in protein-based delivery systems.
Results: Protein-based polymeric nanocarriers can be classified into five main structural classes: protein nanoparticles, protein micelles, protein nanocages, recombinant protein polymer assemblies, and protein-drug conjugate or fusion systems. Albumin-based nanoparticles remain the most clinically advanced platform, whereas ferritin nanocages and virus-like particles provide structurally defined systems for receptor-mediated targeting. Plant-derived proteins such as casein, zein, and gliadin form polymeric matrices relevant for oral delivery, whereas silk fibroin, collagen, gelatin, and recombinant protein polymers self-assemble into structures that support sustained, local, and stimulus-responsive delivery.
Discussion: Despite their potential, protein-based polymeric nanocarriers face several challenges, including protein corona formation, immunogenicity, storage instability, batch variability, scale-up limitations, and regulatory uncertainty.
Conclusion: Future development should prioritize reproducible manufacturing, safer surface modification, improved stability, and rigorous evaluation of immune responses and translational feasibility.