Efficacy of biotene and xerostom on salivary function, biomarkers, and caries risk in radiation-induced xerostomia: A randomized controlled trial.

Anam Alam, Sonali Taneja, Anshuman Kumar, Akriti Dheer
{"title":"Efficacy of biotene and xerostom on salivary function, biomarkers, and caries risk in radiation-induced xerostomia: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Anam Alam, Sonali Taneja, Anshuman Kumar, Akriti Dheer","doi":"10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_29_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiation-induced xerostomia is a common complication in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, significantly impairing oral health, nutrition, and quality of life. Salivary substitutes such as Biotene and Xerostom have been developed to manage symptoms, but clinical evidence comparing their effectiveness is limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of Biotene and Xerostom salivary systems in improving salivary properties and reducing caries susceptibility in postradiotherapy (RT) HNC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six patients with radiation-induced xerostomia were randomly assigned to three groups: Biotene (<i>n</i> = 22), Xerostom (<i>n</i> = 22), and placebo (<i>n</i> = 22). Interventions were used for 28 days. Salivary flow rate, pH, buffering capacity, mucin-7 (MUC7), β-defensin-2, <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> count, and oral mucositis (OM) were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance and Chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both Biotene and Xerostom significantly improved salivary flow (Biotene: 1.26 ± 0.22 mL/min; Xerostom: 1.00 ± 0.25 mL/min) compared to placebo (0.76 ± 0.27 mL/min) at 6 months. pH and buffering capacity also improved in both intervention groups. MUC7 levels were higher in Biotene (77.71 ± 9.38 ng/mL) and Xerostom (74.92 ± 6.76 ng/mL) compared to placebo (61.48 ± 4.96 ng/mL), indicating enhanced mucosal protection. β-defensin-2 levels were lower in treatment groups, suggesting balanced immune activity. <i>S. mutans</i> counts were significantly reduced in Biotene (9.20 ± 8.50 CFU/mL) and Xerostom (12.5 ± 12.82 CFU/mL) versus placebo (118.75 ± 60.61 CFU/mL), reflecting reduced caries risk. OM severity was also lower in treated groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both Biotene and Xerostom improved salivary function, reduced microbial load, and enhanced oral mucosal protection in HNC patients with radiation-induced xerostomia. Biotene demonstrated marginally superior outcomes. These systems may serve as effective interventions for xerostomia management post-RT.</p>","PeriodicalId":516842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","volume":"29 9","pages":"979-984"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13600718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_29_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiation-induced xerostomia is a common complication in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, significantly impairing oral health, nutrition, and quality of life. Salivary substitutes such as Biotene and Xerostom have been developed to manage symptoms, but clinical evidence comparing their effectiveness is limited.

Aim: The aim is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of Biotene and Xerostom salivary systems in improving salivary properties and reducing caries susceptibility in postradiotherapy (RT) HNC patients.

Methods: Sixty-six patients with radiation-induced xerostomia were randomly assigned to three groups: Biotene (n = 22), Xerostom (n = 22), and placebo (n = 22). Interventions were used for 28 days. Salivary flow rate, pH, buffering capacity, mucin-7 (MUC7), β-defensin-2, Streptococcus mutans count, and oral mucositis (OM) were assessed at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance and Chi-square tests.

Results: Both Biotene and Xerostom significantly improved salivary flow (Biotene: 1.26 ± 0.22 mL/min; Xerostom: 1.00 ± 0.25 mL/min) compared to placebo (0.76 ± 0.27 mL/min) at 6 months. pH and buffering capacity also improved in both intervention groups. MUC7 levels were higher in Biotene (77.71 ± 9.38 ng/mL) and Xerostom (74.92 ± 6.76 ng/mL) compared to placebo (61.48 ± 4.96 ng/mL), indicating enhanced mucosal protection. β-defensin-2 levels were lower in treatment groups, suggesting balanced immune activity. S. mutans counts were significantly reduced in Biotene (9.20 ± 8.50 CFU/mL) and Xerostom (12.5 ± 12.82 CFU/mL) versus placebo (118.75 ± 60.61 CFU/mL), reflecting reduced caries risk. OM severity was also lower in treated groups.

Conclusion: Both Biotene and Xerostom improved salivary function, reduced microbial load, and enhanced oral mucosal protection in HNC patients with radiation-induced xerostomia. Biotene demonstrated marginally superior outcomes. These systems may serve as effective interventions for xerostomia management post-RT.

生物素和干口病对放射性口干症患者唾液功能、生物标志物和龋齿风险的影响:一项随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书