A Stepwise Technique for Retrieval of a Seized and Stripped Dental Implant Cover Screw: A Case Report.

IF 0.5 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Keisuke Seki, Kenji Ito, Juntaro Sanada, Taiki Akiyama, Yoshiyuki Hagiwara
{"title":"A Stepwise Technique for Retrieval of a Seized and Stripped Dental Implant Cover Screw: A Case Report.","authors":"Keisuke Seki, Kenji Ito, Juntaro Sanada, Taiki Akiyama, Yoshiyuki Hagiwara","doi":"10.3390/reports9030304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Clinical Significance:</b> In two-stage implant treatment the cover screw must be removed at second-stage surgery. Removal is occasionally prevented by cold welding or seizure. When the drive slot is damaged by escalating torque, no standard salvage protocol has been established, and the implant body itself may ultimately require removal. <b>Case Presentation:</b> During second-stage surgery for three implants placed in the mandibular right posterior region (#44, #45, #46) of a 68-year-old man, the cover screw at the #46 site was seized and could not be loosened with a manual screwdriver. An attempt at removal with a contra-angle implant driver, set first to 20 Ncm and then to 35 Ncm, stripped the drive slot. The procedure was suspended, and a revision was performed two weeks later. A tungsten carbide bur was used under water irrigation to prepare a straight slot across the damaged screw head, and a crown remover with a narrowed flat-blade tip was engaged in this slot. The screw was retrieved intact and the internal connection of the implant remained serviceable. A healing abutment was connected and the implant was restored with a definitive prosthesis, which was in function at the most recent review. At seven weeks after delivery, the distance from the implant platform to the crestal bone was greater at #46 than at the two adjacent implants. <b>Conclusions:</b> This report describes a salvage technique that preserved the implant body without the use of a system-specific retrieval kit. The peri-implant bone level observed at the treated site indicates that the procedure may have been accompanied by a loss of crestal bone, and whether the technique is reproducible will require further cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":74664,"journal":{"name":"Reports (MDPI)","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13611593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports (MDPI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/reports9030304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Clinical Significance: In two-stage implant treatment the cover screw must be removed at second-stage surgery. Removal is occasionally prevented by cold welding or seizure. When the drive slot is damaged by escalating torque, no standard salvage protocol has been established, and the implant body itself may ultimately require removal. Case Presentation: During second-stage surgery for three implants placed in the mandibular right posterior region (#44, #45, #46) of a 68-year-old man, the cover screw at the #46 site was seized and could not be loosened with a manual screwdriver. An attempt at removal with a contra-angle implant driver, set first to 20 Ncm and then to 35 Ncm, stripped the drive slot. The procedure was suspended, and a revision was performed two weeks later. A tungsten carbide bur was used under water irrigation to prepare a straight slot across the damaged screw head, and a crown remover with a narrowed flat-blade tip was engaged in this slot. The screw was retrieved intact and the internal connection of the implant remained serviceable. A healing abutment was connected and the implant was restored with a definitive prosthesis, which was in function at the most recent review. At seven weeks after delivery, the distance from the implant platform to the crestal bone was greater at #46 than at the two adjacent implants. Conclusions: This report describes a salvage technique that preserved the implant body without the use of a system-specific retrieval kit. The peri-implant bone level observed at the treated site indicates that the procedure may have been accompanied by a loss of crestal bone, and whether the technique is reproducible will require further cases.

一种递进式修复被查扣和剥离的牙种植体盖螺钉的方法:1例报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书