Safety and Exploratory Pre-Post Changes Associated with an Orally Disintegrating Three-Strain Probiotic Tablet in Older Adults with Functional Constipation: A Single-Center, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study.
{"title":"Safety and Exploratory Pre-Post Changes Associated with an Orally Disintegrating Three-Strain Probiotic Tablet in Older Adults with Functional Constipation: A Single-Center, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study.","authors":"Daisuke Asaoka, Tsutomu Takeda, Yasuhisa Jimbo, Eiji Kamba, Yusuke Nomoto, Osamu Nomura, Daiki Abe, Kumiko Ueda, Hiroya Ueyama, Hiroyuki Isayama, Mariko Hojo, Akihito Nagahara","doi":"10.3390/diseases14090317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Functional constipation is common in older adults and impairs quality of life. Evidence for multi-strain orally disintegrating (OD) probiotic formulations in this population remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, open-label, single-arm pre-post study, adults aged 65-90 years meeting the Rome IV criteria for functional constipation were administered an OD tablet containing <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> TO-A, <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> T-110, and <i>Clostridium butyricum</i> TO-A for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in the defecation score based on a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale. Secondary endpoints included stool frequency, straining, JPAC-QOL, the modified Constipation Scoring System, Izumo Scale, Dietary Variety Score (DVS), selected metabolic/nutritional variables, and exploratory gut microbiota analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty participants provided consent, and 49 were included in the full analysis set; 45 participants completed the 8-week intervention and were included in the paired primary endpoint analysis. The defecation score showed a nominally significant change toward normalization of stool form at week 8 (IQR: -1.0, 7.0; 95%CI: -9.6, -4.2). Stool frequency did not change significantly, whereas constipation-related quality of life and symptom burden significantly changed. DVS increased modestly, and HbA1c decreased slightly; however, these secondary findings should be interpreted as exploratory because no adjustment for multiplicity was performed. Four patients withdrew from this study: one was due to death, but a causal relationship with the study drug was not confirmed. Two gastrointestinal adverse events could have been related to the study product. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested a larger change in participants not receiving acid-suppressive therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The three-strain OD probiotic tablet was associated with changes in stool form and constipation-related symptom burden in older adults with functional constipation. Because this was a single-arm, open-label study without multiplicity adjustment for secondary endpoints, the findings should be regarded as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Given the absence of a control group, causal efficacy cannot be inferred, and placebo effects, natural symptom fluctuation, or other time-varying confounders cannot be excluded; therefore, the most robust conclusion is that the preparation appeared safe and well tolerated for over 8 weeks in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":72832,"journal":{"name":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13605162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases14090317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/objectives: Functional constipation is common in older adults and impairs quality of life. Evidence for multi-strain orally disintegrating (OD) probiotic formulations in this population remains limited.
Methods: In this single-center, open-label, single-arm pre-post study, adults aged 65-90 years meeting the Rome IV criteria for functional constipation were administered an OD tablet containing Bacillus subtilis TO-A, Enterococcus faecium T-110, and Clostridium butyricum TO-A for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in the defecation score based on a modified Bristol Stool Form Scale. Secondary endpoints included stool frequency, straining, JPAC-QOL, the modified Constipation Scoring System, Izumo Scale, Dietary Variety Score (DVS), selected metabolic/nutritional variables, and exploratory gut microbiota analyses.
Results: Fifty participants provided consent, and 49 were included in the full analysis set; 45 participants completed the 8-week intervention and were included in the paired primary endpoint analysis. The defecation score showed a nominally significant change toward normalization of stool form at week 8 (IQR: -1.0, 7.0; 95%CI: -9.6, -4.2). Stool frequency did not change significantly, whereas constipation-related quality of life and symptom burden significantly changed. DVS increased modestly, and HbA1c decreased slightly; however, these secondary findings should be interpreted as exploratory because no adjustment for multiplicity was performed. Four patients withdrew from this study: one was due to death, but a causal relationship with the study drug was not confirmed. Two gastrointestinal adverse events could have been related to the study product. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested a larger change in participants not receiving acid-suppressive therapy.
Conclusions: The three-strain OD probiotic tablet was associated with changes in stool form and constipation-related symptom burden in older adults with functional constipation. Because this was a single-arm, open-label study without multiplicity adjustment for secondary endpoints, the findings should be regarded as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Given the absence of a control group, causal efficacy cannot be inferred, and placebo effects, natural symptom fluctuation, or other time-varying confounders cannot be excluded; therefore, the most robust conclusion is that the preparation appeared safe and well tolerated for over 8 weeks in this population.