Human-Centered AI for Older Adults.

IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Sarah Allahvirdi, Maryam Zahabi
{"title":"Human-Centered AI for Older Adults.","authors":"Sarah Allahvirdi, Maryam Zahabi","doi":"10.1177/00187208261490714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo identify the needs of older adults when interacting with artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, and to propose design recommendations that can inform the development of future AI systems.BackgroundAI technologies are increasingly integrated into healthcare, education, and social applications for older adults. However, many AI systems fail to account for age-related cognitive, perceptual, and emotional changes, resulting in usability barriers, low trust, and limited adoption.MethodA systematic review of 93 studies categorized by application area identified challenges and user needs through thematic analysis, leading to proposed design recommendations. Two AI-powered platforms were then benchmarked against these design recommendations to assess their suitability for older adults.ResultsFindings highlighted older adults' concerns related to usability, personalization, privacy, and explainability of these technologies. Older adults preferred systems that respect human autonomy, adapt to user context and emotions, and offer clear, trustworthy explanations. A set of actionable design recommendations was proposed to improve AI-powered technologies for older adults. Analysis of two selected AI platforms suggested that these systems only partially aligned with the proposed recommendations.ConclusionThis study offers a set of design recommendations that can support the development of AI tools attuned to older adults' needs.ApplicationThis review identifies critical design gaps and offers actionable design recommendations. Findings can inform future participatory, interdisciplinary efforts in age-inclusive AI development.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"187208261490714"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261490714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo identify the needs of older adults when interacting with artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, and to propose design recommendations that can inform the development of future AI systems.BackgroundAI technologies are increasingly integrated into healthcare, education, and social applications for older adults. However, many AI systems fail to account for age-related cognitive, perceptual, and emotional changes, resulting in usability barriers, low trust, and limited adoption.MethodA systematic review of 93 studies categorized by application area identified challenges and user needs through thematic analysis, leading to proposed design recommendations. Two AI-powered platforms were then benchmarked against these design recommendations to assess their suitability for older adults.ResultsFindings highlighted older adults' concerns related to usability, personalization, privacy, and explainability of these technologies. Older adults preferred systems that respect human autonomy, adapt to user context and emotions, and offer clear, trustworthy explanations. A set of actionable design recommendations was proposed to improve AI-powered technologies for older adults. Analysis of two selected AI platforms suggested that these systems only partially aligned with the proposed recommendations.ConclusionThis study offers a set of design recommendations that can support the development of AI tools attuned to older adults' needs.ApplicationThis review identifies critical design gaps and offers actionable design recommendations. Findings can inform future participatory, interdisciplinary efforts in age-inclusive AI development.

面向老年人的以人为本的人工智能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书