Multimodal AI in precision medicine: linking omics, imaging and clinical decisions.

IF 1.9 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
American journal of clinical and experimental immunology Pub Date : 2026-08-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.62347/URCI9453
Rong Wei, Qiping Zheng
{"title":"Multimodal AI in precision medicine: linking omics, imaging and clinical decisions.","authors":"Rong Wei, Qiping Zheng","doi":"10.62347/URCI9453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Precision medicine is shifting from a single-biomarker paradigm toward multimodal integration of molecular, imaging, and clinical data, with artificial intelligence (AI) serving as a key enabling technology. Multimodal imaging, computational pathology, spatial omics and liquid biopsy have all become more adept at capturing disease and biological variation, and foundation models, especially vision-language models, are now creating a common language between histology, molecular and biomedical text. AI-powered pipelines are also improving data quality upstream, which ultimately means that multimodal inference can be applied to tasks of real clinical importance: biomarker screening, modelling treatment outcomes, even autonomous coordination among diagnostic systems, rather than just retrospective prediction. But none of this means more modalities necessarily translate into more value. Additional data may introduce redundancy, technical artefacts, institutional bias, and missingness. The future of multimodal AI should therefore emphasize sufficiency rather than maximalism, with systems designed to accommodate incomplete or asynchronous inputs, quantify uncertainty, and demonstrate added value over established clinical standards. Ultimately, clinical utility will depend on external and prospective validation showing improvements in calibration, efficiency, net clinical benefit, and patient outcomes. The promise of AI-enabled multimodal precision medicine lies not in combining every available data stream, but in determining which molecular, morphological, and clinical information is necessary, complementary, and actionable for an individual patient at a specific decision point.</p>","PeriodicalId":72163,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental immunology","volume":"15 4","pages":"333-339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13601836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/URCI9453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precision medicine is shifting from a single-biomarker paradigm toward multimodal integration of molecular, imaging, and clinical data, with artificial intelligence (AI) serving as a key enabling technology. Multimodal imaging, computational pathology, spatial omics and liquid biopsy have all become more adept at capturing disease and biological variation, and foundation models, especially vision-language models, are now creating a common language between histology, molecular and biomedical text. AI-powered pipelines are also improving data quality upstream, which ultimately means that multimodal inference can be applied to tasks of real clinical importance: biomarker screening, modelling treatment outcomes, even autonomous coordination among diagnostic systems, rather than just retrospective prediction. But none of this means more modalities necessarily translate into more value. Additional data may introduce redundancy, technical artefacts, institutional bias, and missingness. The future of multimodal AI should therefore emphasize sufficiency rather than maximalism, with systems designed to accommodate incomplete or asynchronous inputs, quantify uncertainty, and demonstrate added value over established clinical standards. Ultimately, clinical utility will depend on external and prospective validation showing improvements in calibration, efficiency, net clinical benefit, and patient outcomes. The promise of AI-enabled multimodal precision medicine lies not in combining every available data stream, but in determining which molecular, morphological, and clinical information is necessary, complementary, and actionable for an individual patient at a specific decision point.

精准医学中的多模式人工智能:连接组学、成像和临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书