Using large language models to create lexicons for interpretable text models with high content validity: The suicide risk lexicon.

IF 4.6 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Daniel M Low, Osiris Rankin, Daniel D L Coppersmith, Kate H Bentley, Matthew K Nock, Satrajit S Ghosh
{"title":"Using large language models to create lexicons for interpretable text models with high content validity: The suicide risk lexicon.","authors":"Daniel M Low, Osiris Rankin, Daniel D L Coppersmith, Kate H Bentley, Matthew K Nock, Satrajit S Ghosh","doi":"10.1037/abn0001152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Researchers often want to measure a variety of constructs such as anxiety, discrimination, or loneliness in text data from surveys, interviews, social media, and electronic health records. Using large language models (LLMs)-although optimal for text classification-remain infeasible for some researchers due to concerns around computational expertise, cost, privacy, and compute requirements. Therefore, some researchers prefer to use lightweight models for large data sets or interpretable models to avoid mistakes in high-stakes scenarios. Lexicons offer simple baselines to LLMs by searching for relevant phrases and can be used together with LLMs to guarantee capturing specific keywords. However, building new lexicons is resource intensive. In this study, we found that GPT-4 Turbo was able to automatically create a lexicon for 49 known risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors, which we release as the Suicide Risk Lexicon. Generating a lexicon with LLMs quickly measures most constructs relevant for suicide risk detection, resulting in high content validity. This lexicon was able to accurately predict risk in crisis counseling conversations. After validating the lexicon with clinician ratings, the lexicon modestly outperformed the linguistic inquiry and word count lexicon, which has low content validity for mental illness, and performed similarly to some black-box deep learning models. We discovered that active suicidal ideation and direct self-injury were stronger indicators of imminent risk than passive suicidal ideation and depressed mood in this ecological setting of crisis counseling conversations. To simplify creating new lexicons for other research domains, we introduce a Python package, construct-tracker. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13614521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researchers often want to measure a variety of constructs such as anxiety, discrimination, or loneliness in text data from surveys, interviews, social media, and electronic health records. Using large language models (LLMs)-although optimal for text classification-remain infeasible for some researchers due to concerns around computational expertise, cost, privacy, and compute requirements. Therefore, some researchers prefer to use lightweight models for large data sets or interpretable models to avoid mistakes in high-stakes scenarios. Lexicons offer simple baselines to LLMs by searching for relevant phrases and can be used together with LLMs to guarantee capturing specific keywords. However, building new lexicons is resource intensive. In this study, we found that GPT-4 Turbo was able to automatically create a lexicon for 49 known risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors, which we release as the Suicide Risk Lexicon. Generating a lexicon with LLMs quickly measures most constructs relevant for suicide risk detection, resulting in high content validity. This lexicon was able to accurately predict risk in crisis counseling conversations. After validating the lexicon with clinician ratings, the lexicon modestly outperformed the linguistic inquiry and word count lexicon, which has low content validity for mental illness, and performed similarly to some black-box deep learning models. We discovered that active suicidal ideation and direct self-injury were stronger indicators of imminent risk than passive suicidal ideation and depressed mood in this ecological setting of crisis counseling conversations. To simplify creating new lexicons for other research domains, we introduce a Python package, construct-tracker. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

使用大型语言模型为高内容效度的可解释文本模型创建词典:自杀风险词典。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书