Li-Kang Chi, Ting-Hong Chien, Tzu-Hsiang Huang, Zai-Fu Yao
{"title":"Context-Dependent Neural Mechanisms of Motor Imagery in Open‑ and Closed‑Skill Athletes Across Competitive Scenarios.","authors":"Li-Kang Chi, Ting-Hong Chien, Tzu-Hsiang Huang, Zai-Fu Yao","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2026.2737678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined how highly trained open- and closed-skill athletes recruit neural resources during cue-supported motor imagery (MI) under two experimentally cued contexts: peak performance imagery (PPI) and routine training imagery (RTI). Thirty-four athletes (17 per group) completed functional magnetic resonance imaging. In planned group-stratified context contrasts, open-skill athletes showed greater activation for RTI than PPI in the occipital pole, precentral gyrus, thalamus, and cerebellum, whereas closed-skill athletes showed greater activation for PPI than RTI in precentral/postcentral regions and the left middle temporal gyrus. These are simple within-group context contrasts, not an omnibus Group × Condition interaction; accordingly, the findings are not described as a double dissociation. The neutral condition was passive observation rather than non-motor imagery, and post-scan manipulation checks were not collected. The results therefore indicate context-associated differences in cue-supported imagery-related activity but do not isolate motor imagery from all other forms of mental generation. Within these limits, the findings motivate a provisional Context-Sensitive Imagery Flexibility Model (CS-IFM), in which the relative weighting of visuospatial-executive and sensorimotor-representational processes may vary with sport demands and imagery context.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2026.2737678","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examined how highly trained open- and closed-skill athletes recruit neural resources during cue-supported motor imagery (MI) under two experimentally cued contexts: peak performance imagery (PPI) and routine training imagery (RTI). Thirty-four athletes (17 per group) completed functional magnetic resonance imaging. In planned group-stratified context contrasts, open-skill athletes showed greater activation for RTI than PPI in the occipital pole, precentral gyrus, thalamus, and cerebellum, whereas closed-skill athletes showed greater activation for PPI than RTI in precentral/postcentral regions and the left middle temporal gyrus. These are simple within-group context contrasts, not an omnibus Group × Condition interaction; accordingly, the findings are not described as a double dissociation. The neutral condition was passive observation rather than non-motor imagery, and post-scan manipulation checks were not collected. The results therefore indicate context-associated differences in cue-supported imagery-related activity but do not isolate motor imagery from all other forms of mental generation. Within these limits, the findings motivate a provisional Context-Sensitive Imagery Flexibility Model (CS-IFM), in which the relative weighting of visuospatial-executive and sensorimotor-representational processes may vary with sport demands and imagery context.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.