Frailty as a predictor of discharge destination and long-term function in older adults with burn injury.

IF 1 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2026-08-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.62347/IXOJ8046
Scott J Moses, Vanessa Dellheim, Elizabeth Perreault, Pengsheng Ni, Matthew Supple, John Schulz, Jeremy Goverman
{"title":"Frailty as a predictor of discharge destination and long-term function in older adults with burn injury.","authors":"Scott J Moses, Vanessa Dellheim, Elizabeth Perreault, Pengsheng Ni, Matthew Supple, John Schulz, Jeremy Goverman","doi":"10.62347/IXOJ8046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elderly patients are at increased risk of burn injury due to the biological, psychological, and social changes associated with aging. This population experiences higher rates of morbidity, mortality, and an increased length of stay compared to younger patients. This study examines frailty as a predictor of discharge disposition and long-term functional outcomes after burn injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study was performed at a single U.S. ABA-verified burn center. Patients > 55 years old admitted from September 2019 to 2021 were screened for enrollment. Patient demographics, the pre-morbid Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Barthel Index (BI), and discharge disposition were recorded. Long-term functional status was assessed using the follow up Barthel Index and a functional questionnaire completed at 6 months to 1.5 years post-discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients were enrolled, with an average age of 71 (SD 10.4) years and a median percentage Total Body Surface Area of Burn Injury (TBSA) of 4 (IQR 5). The mean CFS score was 3.4 (SD 1.7). Patients discharged to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) had significantly higher mean CFS scores (5.0, SD 0.9) compared to those discharged home (2.2, SD 1.2) or to an Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) (3.0, SD 1.3), with a statistically significant difference across groups (F = 15.97; P < 0.0001). At follow-up, 50% (n = 25) of patients reported a return to baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty score as assessed by the CFS is associated with disposition destination after burn injury. A higher CFS was associated with discharge to a higher level of care. The CFS may be useful after burn injury in predicting disposition and assisting with early conversations with patients and their families related to longitudinal care.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":"16 4","pages":"161-168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13601807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/IXOJ8046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Elderly patients are at increased risk of burn injury due to the biological, psychological, and social changes associated with aging. This population experiences higher rates of morbidity, mortality, and an increased length of stay compared to younger patients. This study examines frailty as a predictor of discharge disposition and long-term functional outcomes after burn injury.

Methods: A prospective study was performed at a single U.S. ABA-verified burn center. Patients > 55 years old admitted from September 2019 to 2021 were screened for enrollment. Patient demographics, the pre-morbid Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Barthel Index (BI), and discharge disposition were recorded. Long-term functional status was assessed using the follow up Barthel Index and a functional questionnaire completed at 6 months to 1.5 years post-discharge.

Results: Fifty patients were enrolled, with an average age of 71 (SD 10.4) years and a median percentage Total Body Surface Area of Burn Injury (TBSA) of 4 (IQR 5). The mean CFS score was 3.4 (SD 1.7). Patients discharged to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) had significantly higher mean CFS scores (5.0, SD 0.9) compared to those discharged home (2.2, SD 1.2) or to an Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) (3.0, SD 1.3), with a statistically significant difference across groups (F = 15.97; P < 0.0001). At follow-up, 50% (n = 25) of patients reported a return to baseline.

Conclusions: Frailty score as assessed by the CFS is associated with disposition destination after burn injury. A higher CFS was associated with discharge to a higher level of care. The CFS may be useful after burn injury in predicting disposition and assisting with early conversations with patients and their families related to longitudinal care.

衰弱是老年烧伤患者出院目的地和长期功能的预测因子。
背景:随着年龄的增长,老年患者的生理、心理和社会变化使其发生烧伤的风险增加。与年轻患者相比,这一人群的发病率、死亡率更高,住院时间更长。本研究探讨了虚弱作为烧伤后出院处置和长期功能结局的预测因子。方法:一项前瞻性研究在美国单一的aba认证烧伤中心进行。筛选2019年9月至2021年收治的bb0 ~ 55岁患者进行入组。记录患者人口统计、发病前临床虚弱量表(CFS)、Barthel指数(BI)和出院处置。使用随访Barthel指数和出院后6个月至1.5年完成的功能问卷评估长期功能状态。结果:50例患者入组,平均年龄71岁(SD 10.4)岁,烧伤总体表面积(TBSA)中位数百分比为4 (IQR 5)。平均CFS评分为3.4 (SD 1.7)。出院到熟练护理机构(SNF)的患者的平均CFS评分(5.0,SD 0.9)明显高于出院回家(2.2,SD 1.2)或出院到住院康复机构(IRF) (3.0, SD 1.3)的患者,组间差异有统计学意义(F = 15.97; P < 0.0001)。在随访中,50% (n = 25)的患者报告恢复到基线。结论:CFS评估的虚弱评分与烧伤后的处置目的地有关。CFS越高,出院的护理水平越高。CFS在预测烧伤后的处置和协助与患者及其家属有关的纵向护理的早期对话方面可能是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书