Trusting the Psychotherapist, Trusting the Governmental System and Perhaps Trusting the Neighbor Next Door: Exploring the Institutional Nature of Trust in Psychotherapists and Examining Different Groups of Trusters in a Large German Patient Sample.

IF 2.8 Q2 Psychology
Clinical Psychology in Europe Pub Date : 2026-08-31 eCollection Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.32872/cpe.19731
Marie-Theresa Kaufmann, Christoph Kasinger, Ayline Heller, Elmar Brähler, Bernhard Strauß
{"title":"Trusting the Psychotherapist, Trusting the Governmental System and Perhaps Trusting the Neighbor Next Door: Exploring the Institutional Nature of Trust in Psychotherapists and Examining Different Groups of Trusters in a Large German Patient Sample.","authors":"Marie-Theresa Kaufmann, Christoph Kasinger, Ayline Heller, Elmar Brähler, Bernhard Strauß","doi":"10.32872/cpe.19731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trust in psychotherapists is considered primarily interpersonal. However, psychotherapists could be viewed as representatives of the (healthcare) system. In this study, we investigated whether trust in psychotherapists is more closely linked to interpersonal or institutional trust. Furthermore, we explored whether people can be distinguished into different trust groups.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In a German cross-sectional study sample, we identified 1,300 persons (61.7% female; <i>M</i> = 48.46 years; <i>SD</i> = 14.45 years) indicating experiences with psychotherapy (current and/or in the past). Correlation and linear regression analysis were applied to explore connections between interpersonal (SOEP Interpersonal Trust Scale), institutional (ALLBUS Institutional Trust Scale), and trust in psychotherapists (IIV Psychotherapists). Then, hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify profiles of interpersonal, institutional, and trust in psychotherapists. Group differences of the cluster solution were analyzed for dimensions that are important for trust and psychotherapy such as having experienced trauma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Trust in psychotherapists is not solely associated with interpersonal factors but is also modestly associated with institutional trust. Furthermore, a three-cluster solution emerged with different trust profiles: <i>low trusters</i> (30%) with low scores for all trust measures, <i>high trusters</i> (49%) with the highest values, and <i>system trusters</i> (21%) with the highest trust scores in psychotherapists and institutions, but lower interpersonal trust values. The three groups showed different manifestations of e.g., trauma (LEC-5 Personal Experienced Subscale).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is an institutional nature of trust in psychotherapists, which should be reflected and included in research and practice. Implications could include the common measurement of trust in psychotherapists in therapy and broadening psychotherapeutic interventions according to trust needs. To this end, new ways of building trust both in psychotherapy and institutions in general should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"8 3","pages":"e19731"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13602193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.19731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trust in psychotherapists is considered primarily interpersonal. However, psychotherapists could be viewed as representatives of the (healthcare) system. In this study, we investigated whether trust in psychotherapists is more closely linked to interpersonal or institutional trust. Furthermore, we explored whether people can be distinguished into different trust groups.

Method: In a German cross-sectional study sample, we identified 1,300 persons (61.7% female; M = 48.46 years; SD = 14.45 years) indicating experiences with psychotherapy (current and/or in the past). Correlation and linear regression analysis were applied to explore connections between interpersonal (SOEP Interpersonal Trust Scale), institutional (ALLBUS Institutional Trust Scale), and trust in psychotherapists (IIV Psychotherapists). Then, hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify profiles of interpersonal, institutional, and trust in psychotherapists. Group differences of the cluster solution were analyzed for dimensions that are important for trust and psychotherapy such as having experienced trauma.

Results: Trust in psychotherapists is not solely associated with interpersonal factors but is also modestly associated with institutional trust. Furthermore, a three-cluster solution emerged with different trust profiles: low trusters (30%) with low scores for all trust measures, high trusters (49%) with the highest values, and system trusters (21%) with the highest trust scores in psychotherapists and institutions, but lower interpersonal trust values. The three groups showed different manifestations of e.g., trauma (LEC-5 Personal Experienced Subscale).

Conclusion: There is an institutional nature of trust in psychotherapists, which should be reflected and included in research and practice. Implications could include the common measurement of trust in psychotherapists in therapy and broadening psychotherapeutic interventions according to trust needs. To this end, new ways of building trust both in psychotherapy and institutions in general should be explored.

信任心理治疗师,信任政府系统,也许信任隔壁邻居:探索心理治疗师信任的制度性质,并在一个大的德国患者样本中检查不同的信任群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Clinical Psychology in Europe Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书