Comparative Reduction of Pharmaceutical Hazards in Wastewater among Pilot-Scale Quaternary Treatment Technologies across Seasons

IF 9.6 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
ACS Environmental Au Pub Date : 2026-09-16 Epub Date: 2026-08-01 DOI:10.1021/acsenvironau.6c00068
Michal Bittner, Lucie Báborská, Kateřina Bočková, Anna Ireinová, Marek Holba, Jaroslav Lev, Daniel Polášek, Lucie Bláhová, Bryan W. Brooks, Luděk Bláha
{"title":"Comparative Reduction of Pharmaceutical Hazards in Wastewater among Pilot-Scale Quaternary Treatment Technologies across Seasons","authors":"Michal Bittner,&nbsp;Lucie Báborská,&nbsp;Kateřina Bočková,&nbsp;Anna Ireinová,&nbsp;Marek Holba,&nbsp;Jaroslav Lev,&nbsp;Daniel Polášek,&nbsp;Lucie Bláhová,&nbsp;Bryan W. Brooks,&nbsp;Luděk Bláha","doi":"10.1021/acsenvironau.6c00068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For wastewater to provide freshwater resources, reclaimed\r\nwater\r\nshould not contain pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs) or other\r\ncontaminants that pose significant ecological or health risks. This\r\nconsideration addresses a recent European Union (EU) wastewater regulation\r\nmandating an 80% removal efficiency (RE) for indicator PhACs. We investigated\r\nREs of six different quaternary treatment technologies (QTTs) over\r\na year-long study to identify seasonal variability and potential environmental\r\nrisks of PhACs in recycled water. Wastewater from both a WWTP effluent\r\nand subsequent QTT effluents was sampled approximately every two to\r\nsix weeks and processed by solid-phase extraction, and 12 indicator\r\nPhACs were analyzed by LC–MS/MS. Though no RE was observed\r\nfor ultrafiltration (UF) and limited RE for granular activated carbon\r\n(GAC) and GAC + UV, advanced treatment with ozonation (UF + O<sub>3</sub>) and reverse osmosis (UF + GAC + UV + RO) achieved over 99%\r\nRE for most PhACs during both cold and warm seasons. Probabilistic\r\nenvironmental hazard assessments demonstrated that even after QTT,\r\nsome PhACs, particularly diclofenac, remained at concentrations that\r\nexceeded predicted no-effect concentrations, indicating the need for\r\ncontinued improvement in wastewater treatment and water reclamation\r\nstrategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":29801,"journal":{"name":"ACS Environmental Au","volume":"6 5","pages":"864–878"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Environmental Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenvironau.6c00068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For wastewater to provide freshwater resources, reclaimed water should not contain pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs) or other contaminants that pose significant ecological or health risks. This consideration addresses a recent European Union (EU) wastewater regulation mandating an 80% removal efficiency (RE) for indicator PhACs. We investigated REs of six different quaternary treatment technologies (QTTs) over a year-long study to identify seasonal variability and potential environmental risks of PhACs in recycled water. Wastewater from both a WWTP effluent and subsequent QTT effluents was sampled approximately every two to six weeks and processed by solid-phase extraction, and 12 indicator PhACs were analyzed by LC–MS/MS. Though no RE was observed for ultrafiltration (UF) and limited RE for granular activated carbon (GAC) and GAC + UV, advanced treatment with ozonation (UF + O3) and reverse osmosis (UF + GAC + UV + RO) achieved over 99% RE for most PhACs during both cold and warm seasons. Probabilistic environmental hazard assessments demonstrated that even after QTT, some PhACs, particularly diclofenac, remained at concentrations that exceeded predicted no-effect concentrations, indicating the need for continued improvement in wastewater treatment and water reclamation strategies.

中试季处理技术降低废水中药物危害的比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Environmental Au
ACS Environmental Au 环境科学-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ACS Environmental Au is an open access journal which publishes experimental research and theoretical results in all aspects of environmental science and technology both pure and applied. Short letters comprehensive articles reviews and perspectives are welcome in the following areas:Alternative EnergyAnthropogenic Impacts on Atmosphere Soil or WaterBiogeochemical CyclingBiomass or Wastes as ResourcesContaminants in Aquatic and Terrestrial EnvironmentsEnvironmental Data ScienceEcotoxicology and Public HealthEnergy and ClimateEnvironmental Modeling Processes and Measurement Methods and TechnologiesEnvironmental Nanotechnology and BiotechnologyGreen ChemistryGreen Manufacturing and EngineeringRisk assessment Regulatory Frameworks and Life-Cycle AssessmentsTreatment and Resource Recovery and Waste Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书