Michal Bittner, Lucie Báborská, Kateřina Bočková, Anna Ireinová, Marek Holba, Jaroslav Lev, Daniel Polášek, Lucie Bláhová, Bryan W. Brooks, Luděk Bláha
{"title":"Comparative Reduction of Pharmaceutical Hazards in Wastewater among Pilot-Scale Quaternary Treatment Technologies across Seasons","authors":"Michal Bittner, Lucie Báborská, Kateřina Bočková, Anna Ireinová, Marek Holba, Jaroslav Lev, Daniel Polášek, Lucie Bláhová, Bryan W. Brooks, Luděk Bláha","doi":"10.1021/acsenvironau.6c00068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For wastewater to provide freshwater resources, reclaimed\r\nwater\r\nshould not contain pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs) or other\r\ncontaminants that pose significant ecological or health risks. This\r\nconsideration addresses a recent European Union (EU) wastewater regulation\r\nmandating an 80% removal efficiency (RE) for indicator PhACs. We investigated\r\nREs of six different quaternary treatment technologies (QTTs) over\r\na year-long study to identify seasonal variability and potential environmental\r\nrisks of PhACs in recycled water. Wastewater from both a WWTP effluent\r\nand subsequent QTT effluents was sampled approximately every two to\r\nsix weeks and processed by solid-phase extraction, and 12 indicator\r\nPhACs were analyzed by LC–MS/MS. Though no RE was observed\r\nfor ultrafiltration (UF) and limited RE for granular activated carbon\r\n(GAC) and GAC + UV, advanced treatment with ozonation (UF + O<sub>3</sub>) and reverse osmosis (UF + GAC + UV + RO) achieved over 99%\r\nRE for most PhACs during both cold and warm seasons. Probabilistic\r\nenvironmental hazard assessments demonstrated that even after QTT,\r\nsome PhACs, particularly diclofenac, remained at concentrations that\r\nexceeded predicted no-effect concentrations, indicating the need for\r\ncontinued improvement in wastewater treatment and water reclamation\r\nstrategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":29801,"journal":{"name":"ACS Environmental Au","volume":"6 5","pages":"864–878"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Environmental Au","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenvironau.6c00068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For wastewater to provide freshwater resources, reclaimed
water
should not contain pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs) or other
contaminants that pose significant ecological or health risks. This
consideration addresses a recent European Union (EU) wastewater regulation
mandating an 80% removal efficiency (RE) for indicator PhACs. We investigated
REs of six different quaternary treatment technologies (QTTs) over
a year-long study to identify seasonal variability and potential environmental
risks of PhACs in recycled water. Wastewater from both a WWTP effluent
and subsequent QTT effluents was sampled approximately every two to
six weeks and processed by solid-phase extraction, and 12 indicator
PhACs were analyzed by LC–MS/MS. Though no RE was observed
for ultrafiltration (UF) and limited RE for granular activated carbon
(GAC) and GAC + UV, advanced treatment with ozonation (UF + O3) and reverse osmosis (UF + GAC + UV + RO) achieved over 99%
RE for most PhACs during both cold and warm seasons. Probabilistic
environmental hazard assessments demonstrated that even after QTT,
some PhACs, particularly diclofenac, remained at concentrations that
exceeded predicted no-effect concentrations, indicating the need for
continued improvement in wastewater treatment and water reclamation
strategies.
期刊介绍:
ACS Environmental Au is an open access journal which publishes experimental research and theoretical results in all aspects of environmental science and technology both pure and applied. Short letters comprehensive articles reviews and perspectives are welcome in the following areas:Alternative EnergyAnthropogenic Impacts on Atmosphere Soil or WaterBiogeochemical CyclingBiomass or Wastes as ResourcesContaminants in Aquatic and Terrestrial EnvironmentsEnvironmental Data ScienceEcotoxicology and Public HealthEnergy and ClimateEnvironmental Modeling Processes and Measurement Methods and TechnologiesEnvironmental Nanotechnology and BiotechnologyGreen ChemistryGreen Manufacturing and EngineeringRisk assessment Regulatory Frameworks and Life-Cycle AssessmentsTreatment and Resource Recovery and Waste Management