Effectiveness of a New Media Health Education Program in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2026-09-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S625265
Chunyan Zhang, Na Li, Guanghui Jiang, Mengqiu Zhao, Huimin Zhang, Zhifa Lun, Ying Liu
{"title":"Effectiveness of a New Media Health Education Program in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.","authors":"Chunyan Zhang, Na Li, Guanghui Jiang, Mengqiu Zhao, Huimin Zhang, Zhifa Lun, Ying Liu","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S625265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of a new media-based stratified health education program in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, prospective, non-randomized, quasi-experimental controlled intervention study screened 312 patients and enrolled 276 eligible patients (observation group, n=134; control group, n=142). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 100 patients per group were included in the matched analysis. The control group received conventional health education, whereas the observation group received a new media-based stratified health education program for 12 months. Health knowledge awareness, CKD self-management behavior, eGFR, UACR, and nursing satisfaction were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 12 months, health knowledge awareness was higher in the observation group than in the control group (89.00% vs 56.00%, P<0.001). CKD self-management scores were also higher in the observation group (all P<0.001). Both groups showed declining eGFR and increasing UACR; however, the changes were smaller in the observation group (both between-group follow-up comparisons P<0.01). The overall three-category nursing satisfaction distribution differed between groups (P<0.001), whereas the dichotomized satisfaction rate did not differ significantly (89.00% vs 82.00%, P=0.160).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>New media-based stratified health education was associated with better health knowledge and self-management outcomes in patients with CKD. The observed renal function differences should be interpreted cautiously because of the non-randomized design, residual confounding, and the 12-month follow-up. The binary nursing satisfaction rate was not significantly different between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"20 ","pages":"625265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13604015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S625265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a new media-based stratified health education program in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods: This single-center, prospective, non-randomized, quasi-experimental controlled intervention study screened 312 patients and enrolled 276 eligible patients (observation group, n=134; control group, n=142). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 100 patients per group were included in the matched analysis. The control group received conventional health education, whereas the observation group received a new media-based stratified health education program for 12 months. Health knowledge awareness, CKD self-management behavior, eGFR, UACR, and nursing satisfaction were evaluated.

Results: After 12 months, health knowledge awareness was higher in the observation group than in the control group (89.00% vs 56.00%, P<0.001). CKD self-management scores were also higher in the observation group (all P<0.001). Both groups showed declining eGFR and increasing UACR; however, the changes were smaller in the observation group (both between-group follow-up comparisons P<0.01). The overall three-category nursing satisfaction distribution differed between groups (P<0.001), whereas the dichotomized satisfaction rate did not differ significantly (89.00% vs 82.00%, P=0.160).

Conclusion: New media-based stratified health education was associated with better health knowledge and self-management outcomes in patients with CKD. The observed renal function differences should be interpreted cautiously because of the non-randomized design, residual confounding, and the 12-month follow-up. The binary nursing satisfaction rate was not significantly different between groups.

新媒体健康教育项目对慢性肾病患者的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书