{"title":"Functional Outcomes in Ambulatory Sacral Defect Reconstruction: Focused Appraisal and Muscle-splitting Gluteus Maximus V-Y Advancement.","authors":"Federico Sacasa, Gustavo Herdocia Baus","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000008119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sacral ulcer reconstruction is usually described in chronically immobilized or neurologically impaired patients. In ambulatory patients, reconstruction must provide durable coverage while preserving function and future reconstructive options. Ambulatory-specific functional outcomes remain poorly synthesized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report the case of a previously ambulatory 69-year-old woman with a stage IV sacral pressure ulcer after transient immobilization due to an acute metabolic derangement. Reconstruction was performed using a unilateral muscle-splitting gluteus maximus myocutaneous V-Y advancement flap. A focused appraisal of published reports in ambulatory patients was performed to contextualize functional outcomes across reconstructive modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After serial debridement, infection control, and metabolic optimization, a clean 14 × 8 cm defect was reconstructed. The flap enabled midline closure through convergent advancement vectors while preserving the femoral insertion, avoiding pedicle dissection, and maintaining a multipedicled vascular architecture for dead-space obliteration and central padding. At 12 months, durable closure without recurrence was achieved. Functional recovery improved from a Barthel index of 65 to 95, with return to independent ambulation. Available ambulatory-specific reports generally describe preserved ambulation across reconstructive modalities despite heterogeneity in technique, cohort composition, and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Functional preservation after sacral reconstruction in ambulatory patients can be achieved across reconstructive modalities and may depend more on patient selection, physiological optimization, and biomechanical considerations than on flap type alone. Unilateral muscle-splitting gluteus maximus V-Y advancement offers a reliable option for selected stage IV sacral defects requiring durable coverage, functional preservation, and maintenance of future reconstructive options.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"14 9","pages":"e8119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13600580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000008119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sacral ulcer reconstruction is usually described in chronically immobilized or neurologically impaired patients. In ambulatory patients, reconstruction must provide durable coverage while preserving function and future reconstructive options. Ambulatory-specific functional outcomes remain poorly synthesized.
Methods: We report the case of a previously ambulatory 69-year-old woman with a stage IV sacral pressure ulcer after transient immobilization due to an acute metabolic derangement. Reconstruction was performed using a unilateral muscle-splitting gluteus maximus myocutaneous V-Y advancement flap. A focused appraisal of published reports in ambulatory patients was performed to contextualize functional outcomes across reconstructive modalities.
Results: After serial debridement, infection control, and metabolic optimization, a clean 14 × 8 cm defect was reconstructed. The flap enabled midline closure through convergent advancement vectors while preserving the femoral insertion, avoiding pedicle dissection, and maintaining a multipedicled vascular architecture for dead-space obliteration and central padding. At 12 months, durable closure without recurrence was achieved. Functional recovery improved from a Barthel index of 65 to 95, with return to independent ambulation. Available ambulatory-specific reports generally describe preserved ambulation across reconstructive modalities despite heterogeneity in technique, cohort composition, and follow-up.
Conclusions: Functional preservation after sacral reconstruction in ambulatory patients can be achieved across reconstructive modalities and may depend more on patient selection, physiological optimization, and biomechanical considerations than on flap type alone. Unilateral muscle-splitting gluteus maximus V-Y advancement offers a reliable option for selected stage IV sacral defects requiring durable coverage, functional preservation, and maintenance of future reconstructive options.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.