Associations of waterbirds with harvesting and ploughing events in rice fields: increasing foraging opportunities or just gathering for the feast?

IF 2.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
João Paulino, José Pedro Granadeiro, Edna Correia, Teresa Catry
{"title":"Associations of waterbirds with harvesting and ploughing events in rice fields: increasing foraging opportunities or just gathering for the feast?","authors":"João Paulino, José Pedro Granadeiro, Edna Correia, Teresa Catry","doi":"10.1007/s00442-026-05980-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surges in food availability create localized intense foraging opportunities, often attracting multi-species consumer groups. Agricultural practices can trigger these surges, prompting bird associations. However, the strength and duration of associations and its drivers, remain unclear. This study examines waterbird association with harvesting and ploughing events in rice fields. The duration and magnitude of these associations were determined and three hypotheses addressed to explain them: (1) increased food availability, (2) enhanced foraging success and (3) reduced time allocated to vigilance. Waterbird counts and GPS tracking revealed strong associations with management events. Bird numbers spiked during events but declined within one to two days. Food availability increased significantly during events - crayfish and rice during harvesting, worms and soil penetrability during ploughing - supporting Hypothesis (1) However, this did not improve foraging performance (intake rate, foraging success), rejecting Hypothesis (2) Higher competition, interference or kleptoparasitism in these large mixed-species flocks may offset the benefits of increased food availability. Alternatively, prey intake may be constrained by a saturating functional response, with birds operating near maximum intake despite higher food availability. Hypothesis 3 was also unsupported, as birds did not reduce vigilance. Overall, birds gain no additional foraging advantage from attending actively managed fields relative to those managed over three days earlier. We hypothesize they are attracted by the expectation of improved foraging opportunities, with associations driven by gregariousness and local enhancement. Results highlight complex responses to food surges, suggesting waterbirds maintain stable foraging performance during and after agricultural management, indicating resilience to management timing shifts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"208 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-026-05980-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surges in food availability create localized intense foraging opportunities, often attracting multi-species consumer groups. Agricultural practices can trigger these surges, prompting bird associations. However, the strength and duration of associations and its drivers, remain unclear. This study examines waterbird association with harvesting and ploughing events in rice fields. The duration and magnitude of these associations were determined and three hypotheses addressed to explain them: (1) increased food availability, (2) enhanced foraging success and (3) reduced time allocated to vigilance. Waterbird counts and GPS tracking revealed strong associations with management events. Bird numbers spiked during events but declined within one to two days. Food availability increased significantly during events - crayfish and rice during harvesting, worms and soil penetrability during ploughing - supporting Hypothesis (1) However, this did not improve foraging performance (intake rate, foraging success), rejecting Hypothesis (2) Higher competition, interference or kleptoparasitism in these large mixed-species flocks may offset the benefits of increased food availability. Alternatively, prey intake may be constrained by a saturating functional response, with birds operating near maximum intake despite higher food availability. Hypothesis 3 was also unsupported, as birds did not reduce vigilance. Overall, birds gain no additional foraging advantage from attending actively managed fields relative to those managed over three days earlier. We hypothesize they are attracted by the expectation of improved foraging opportunities, with associations driven by gregariousness and local enhancement. Results highlight complex responses to food surges, suggesting waterbirds maintain stable foraging performance during and after agricultural management, indicating resilience to management timing shifts.

水鸟与稻田收获和耕作事件的联系:增加觅食机会还是只是为了盛宴而聚集?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书