Incidental findings from panoramic radiographs: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Anastasia Imboden-Ilia, Heba Awaad, Emmanouil Inglezos, Theodore Eliades, Spyridon N Papageorgiou
{"title":"Incidental findings from panoramic radiographs: A systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"Anastasia Imboden-Ilia, Heba Awaad, Emmanouil Inglezos, Theodore Eliades, Spyridon N Papageorgiou","doi":"10.1007/s00784-026-07148-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The use of radiographs is widely spread, both among general dentists and specialists, since it provides a view of the oral and perioral tissues using a relatively easy-to-acquire and low-dose image. The aim of this systematic review was to critically appraise and summarize evidence from clinical studies on the prevalence of incidental findings from panoramic radiographs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Systematic literature searches without restrictions were undertaken in eight databases from inception up to January 2026 for studies reporting on incidental findings from panoramic radiographs of any dental patients. After duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment using a custom tool based on the Joanna Briggs Institute's tool for prevalence studies, random-effects meta-analyses were performed, followed by subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five studies covering a total of 66 882 patients (44.1% male; average age 28.9 years) were included. The prevalence of incidental findings ranged from 5.2% to 88.1%, with average distribution prevalences between 22.9% and 53.1%, but heterogeneity was high across studies. Incidental findings were most often related to airways (30.9%), followed by teeth (12.2%), soft-tissue calcifications (9.4%), spine (7.4%), radiopacities (7.1%), and temporomandibular joint (1.8%). However, several methodological issues were present in the included studies (incomplete reporting of patient- or radiography-related details, incomplete categorization and reporting of the severity of findings, small sample sizes, and issues with research transparency).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence indicates that incidental findings are common in panoramic radiographs of dental patients. Although many incidental findings are clinically insignificant, some may have important implications. When a dental panoramic image is justified, it should be adequately assessed for incidental findings by either a specialist oral and maxillofacial radiologist or a dentist with appropriate training and experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"30 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13612610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-026-07148-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The use of radiographs is widely spread, both among general dentists and specialists, since it provides a view of the oral and perioral tissues using a relatively easy-to-acquire and low-dose image. The aim of this systematic review was to critically appraise and summarize evidence from clinical studies on the prevalence of incidental findings from panoramic radiographs.

Method: Systematic literature searches without restrictions were undertaken in eight databases from inception up to January 2026 for studies reporting on incidental findings from panoramic radiographs of any dental patients. After duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment using a custom tool based on the Joanna Briggs Institute's tool for prevalence studies, random-effects meta-analyses were performed, followed by subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses.

Results: Twenty-five studies covering a total of 66 882 patients (44.1% male; average age 28.9 years) were included. The prevalence of incidental findings ranged from 5.2% to 88.1%, with average distribution prevalences between 22.9% and 53.1%, but heterogeneity was high across studies. Incidental findings were most often related to airways (30.9%), followed by teeth (12.2%), soft-tissue calcifications (9.4%), spine (7.4%), radiopacities (7.1%), and temporomandibular joint (1.8%). However, several methodological issues were present in the included studies (incomplete reporting of patient- or radiography-related details, incomplete categorization and reporting of the severity of findings, small sample sizes, and issues with research transparency).

Conclusion: Evidence indicates that incidental findings are common in panoramic radiographs of dental patients. Although many incidental findings are clinically insignificant, some may have important implications. When a dental panoramic image is justified, it should be adequately assessed for incidental findings by either a specialist oral and maxillofacial radiologist or a dentist with appropriate training and experience.

全景x线片的偶然发现:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:x线片在普通牙医和专科医生中广泛使用,因为它使用相对容易获取和低剂量的图像提供口腔和口腔周围组织的视图。本系统综述的目的是批判性地评估和总结来自全景x线片附带发现患病率的临床研究证据。方法:系统地检索8个数据库,从建立到2026年1月,对任何牙科患者的全景x线片附带发现的研究进行无限制的检索。在重复研究选择、数据提取和使用基于乔安娜布里格斯研究所流行病学研究工具的自定义工具进行偏倚风险评估后,进行随机效应荟萃分析,然后进行亚组、荟萃回归和敏感性分析。结果:纳入25项研究,共纳入66 882例患者(男性44.1%,平均年龄28.9岁)。意外发现的患病率在5.2%至88.1%之间,平均分布患病率在22.9%至53.1%之间,但各研究的异质性很高。意外发现最常与气道有关(30.9%),其次是牙齿(12.2%)、软组织钙化(9.4%)、脊柱(7.4%)、放射性混浊(7.1%)和颞下颌关节(1.8%)。然而,在纳入的研究中存在一些方法学问题(不完整的患者或放射学相关细节报告,不完整的分类和报告发现的严重性,小样本量和研究透明度问题)。结论:有证据表明,在牙科患者的全景x线片中,偶然发现是常见的。虽然许多偶然发现在临床上并不重要,但有些可能具有重要意义。当牙科全景图像是合理的,它应该充分评估的偶然发现,无论是由专家口腔颌面放射学家或牙医适当的培训和经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书