Therapeutic Implications of Cell Death Pathways Across the Course of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Jiayang Yu, Dong Xie, Xinyu Zeng, Shuaipan Zhang, Bin Xiao, Jing Zhang, Min Fang, Qingguang Zhu, Chongjie Yao
{"title":"Therapeutic Implications of Cell Death Pathways Across the Course of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.","authors":"Jiayang Yu, Dong Xie, Xinyu Zeng, Shuaipan Zhang, Bin Xiao, Jing Zhang, Min Fang, Qingguang Zhu, Chongjie Yao","doi":"10.2174/011570159X500937260908042834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive motor neuron loss, resulting in paralysis and limited survival. Multiple regulated cell death pathways, including apoptosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, lysosomal cell death, autophagy-dependent cell death, NETosis, and other emerging cell death modalities, have been implicated in ALS, but their mechanistic interactions and relative contributions remain poorly understood. This knowledge gap has hindered the development of effective therapies. Better experimental models are needed to dissect these pathways. This review summarizes current knowledge on the roles of cell death pathways in ALS. A tiered framework (M1-M4) is applied to critically evaluate data from human postmortem tissue, patient-derived cells, and animal models, ranking studies according to their relevance to human disease. Potential crosstalk among these pathways is further examined. It is also proposed that the relative contribution of specific cell death pathways may shift with disease progression, although this hypothesis requires longitudinal validation. To integrate this dynamic perspective, cell death pathway activities are hypothetically aligned with the King's clinical staging system. This stage-informed framework is presented as a conceptual model intended to generate hypotheses rather than to serve as a validated clinical algorithm. The model distinguishes established therapies from preclinical and exploratory strategies. Future research should prioritize the development of human-relevant model systems, the identification of longitudinal biomarkers of cell death, and the implementation of rigorously designed combination trials. These efforts may ultimately enable more precise, stage-appropriate therapeutic strategies for ALS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10905,"journal":{"name":"Current Neuropharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011570159X500937260908042834","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive motor neuron loss, resulting in paralysis and limited survival. Multiple regulated cell death pathways, including apoptosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, lysosomal cell death, autophagy-dependent cell death, NETosis, and other emerging cell death modalities, have been implicated in ALS, but their mechanistic interactions and relative contributions remain poorly understood. This knowledge gap has hindered the development of effective therapies. Better experimental models are needed to dissect these pathways. This review summarizes current knowledge on the roles of cell death pathways in ALS. A tiered framework (M1-M4) is applied to critically evaluate data from human postmortem tissue, patient-derived cells, and animal models, ranking studies according to their relevance to human disease. Potential crosstalk among these pathways is further examined. It is also proposed that the relative contribution of specific cell death pathways may shift with disease progression, although this hypothesis requires longitudinal validation. To integrate this dynamic perspective, cell death pathway activities are hypothetically aligned with the King's clinical staging system. This stage-informed framework is presented as a conceptual model intended to generate hypotheses rather than to serve as a validated clinical algorithm. The model distinguishes established therapies from preclinical and exploratory strategies. Future research should prioritize the development of human-relevant model systems, the identification of longitudinal biomarkers of cell death, and the implementation of rigorously designed combination trials. These efforts may ultimately enable more precise, stage-appropriate therapeutic strategies for ALS.

肌萎缩性侧索硬化过程中细胞死亡途径的治疗意义。
肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种致命的神经退行性疾病,其特征是进行性运动神经元丧失,导致瘫痪和有限的生存期。多种受调控的细胞死亡途径,包括凋亡、坏死性死亡、铁性死亡、焦亡、溶酶体细胞死亡、自噬依赖性细胞死亡、NETosis和其他新出现的细胞死亡方式,都与ALS有关,但它们的机制相互作用和相关贡献仍然知之甚少。这种知识差距阻碍了有效疗法的发展。需要更好的实验模型来剖析这些途径。本文综述了目前关于细胞死亡途径在ALS中的作用的知识。分级框架(M1-M4)用于严格评估来自人类死后组织、患者来源细胞和动物模型的数据,并根据其与人类疾病的相关性对研究进行排名。进一步研究了这些途径之间潜在的串扰。也有人提出,特定细胞死亡途径的相对贡献可能随着疾病进展而改变,尽管这一假设需要纵向验证。为了整合这一动态视角,假设细胞死亡途径活动与King的临床分期系统一致。这个阶段知情框架是作为一个概念模型提出的,旨在产生假设,而不是作为一个经过验证的临床算法。该模型将已建立的治疗方法与临床前和探索性策略区分开来。未来的研究应优先发展与人类相关的模型系统,识别细胞死亡的纵向生物标志物,并实施严格设计的联合试验。这些努力可能最终为ALS提供更精确、更适合分期的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Neuropharmacology
Current Neuropharmacology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Neuropharmacology aims to provide current, comprehensive/mini reviews and guest edited issues of all areas of neuropharmacology and related matters of neuroscience. The reviews cover the fields of molecular, cellular, and systems/behavioural aspects of neuropharmacology and neuroscience. The journal serves as a comprehensive, multidisciplinary expert forum for neuropharmacologists and neuroscientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书