Instruments for assessing and classifying food good manufacturing practices: an integrative review.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ciencia & saude coletiva Pub Date : 2026-09-21 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-8123202631.12782024
Ana Helena Moretto Capobiango, Letícia Lopes Vieira, Dayane de Castro Morais, Elizangela da Silva Miguel, Sílvia Oliveira Lopes, Silvia Eloíza Priore, Glauce Dias da Costa
{"title":"Instruments for assessing and classifying food good manufacturing practices: an integrative review.","authors":"Ana Helena Moretto Capobiango, Letícia Lopes Vieira, Dayane de Castro Morais, Elizangela da Silva Miguel, Sílvia Oliveira Lopes, Silvia Eloíza Priore, Glauce Dias da Costa","doi":"10.1590/1413-8123202631.12782024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this integrative review was to identify instruments for assessing good manufacturing practices for food in the literature, focusing on the methodologies used and health risk classification for food establishments. Searches were performed of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for documents published between 2000 and 2022. The inclusion criteria were original review articles, resolutions and standards addressing instruments assessing food GMP and presenting risk classification written in English, Portuguese and Spanish. Thirteen records from different countries were included that classified health risks in establishments handling or producing food using different instruments. The findings reveal a lack of standardization of methodologies for classifying health risks and shortcomings that can adversely affect food safety and consumer health. To improve effectiveness, it is necessary to review resolutions, developing specific standards for each type of establishment, and restructure public policies and research to validate and standardize health surveillance instruments across different levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":10195,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","volume":"31 suppl 1","pages":"e12782024"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-8123202631.12782024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this integrative review was to identify instruments for assessing good manufacturing practices for food in the literature, focusing on the methodologies used and health risk classification for food establishments. Searches were performed of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for documents published between 2000 and 2022. The inclusion criteria were original review articles, resolutions and standards addressing instruments assessing food GMP and presenting risk classification written in English, Portuguese and Spanish. Thirteen records from different countries were included that classified health risks in establishments handling or producing food using different instruments. The findings reveal a lack of standardization of methodologies for classifying health risks and shortcomings that can adversely affect food safety and consumer health. To improve effectiveness, it is necessary to review resolutions, developing specific standards for each type of establishment, and restructure public policies and research to validate and standardize health surveillance instruments across different levels.

食品良好生产规范评估和分类工具:综合综述。
这项综合审查的目的是确定评估文献中食品良好生产规范的工具,重点是食品企业使用的方法和健康风险分类。在PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus上搜索2000年至2022年间发表的文献。纳入标准是用英语、葡萄牙语和西班牙语撰写的原始评审文章、决议和标准,涉及食品GMP评估工具和呈现风险分类。来自不同国家的13项记录对使用不同仪器处理或生产食品的机构的健康风险进行了分类。调查结果显示,对可能对食品安全和消费者健康产生不利影响的健康风险和缺陷进行分类的方法缺乏标准化。为了提高效力,有必要审查各项决议,为每一类机构制定具体标准,并调整公共政策和研究,以验证和规范不同层次的卫生监测手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ciencia & saude coletiva
Ciencia & saude coletiva PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
533
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva publishes debates, analyses, and results of research on a Specific Theme considered current and relevant to the field of Collective Health. Its abbreviated title is Ciênc. saúde coletiva, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书