{"title":"Emotional Labour in Psychotherapy: A Scoping Review of How Therapists Regulate Emotions in Clinical Practice","authors":"Judith Velasco, Francisco J. Sanmartín","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Emotional labour is an integral yet conceptually underexamined feature of psychotherapeutic work. This scoping review mapped how emotional labour has been conceptualized and operationalized among psychotherapists, along with the associated outcomes and factors linked to greater emotional burden, and potential protective resources. Following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidance, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Scopus were searched in August 2025 and updated in April 2026 for peer-reviewed studies on emotional labour among professionals delivering psychotherapy published in English or Spanish. Two reviewers independently screened and charted records. Fourteen sources met inclusion criteria, comprising both quantitative and qualitative research. Emotional labour was most commonly conceptualized as the regulation of emotional experience and expression to meet professional expectations. Operationalizations ranged from surface and deep acting to multidimensional models incorporating emotional dissonance. Therapists described emotional labour as intrinsic, emotionally ambivalent and capable of extending beyond the therapy room. Surface acting and emotional dissonance were most consistently linked to exhaustion, burnout and secondary traumatic stress, whereas self-compassion, psychological flexibility and professional identity were associated with more favourable responses to emotional demands. Emotional labour thus appears structurally embedded in psychotherapeutic practice, although the predominantly cross-sectional evidence limits conclusions about temporal and causal relationships, underscoring the need for longitudinal and intervention research.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"33 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Emotional labour is an integral yet conceptually underexamined feature of psychotherapeutic work. This scoping review mapped how emotional labour has been conceptualized and operationalized among psychotherapists, along with the associated outcomes and factors linked to greater emotional burden, and potential protective resources. Following JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidance, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Scopus were searched in August 2025 and updated in April 2026 for peer-reviewed studies on emotional labour among professionals delivering psychotherapy published in English or Spanish. Two reviewers independently screened and charted records. Fourteen sources met inclusion criteria, comprising both quantitative and qualitative research. Emotional labour was most commonly conceptualized as the regulation of emotional experience and expression to meet professional expectations. Operationalizations ranged from surface and deep acting to multidimensional models incorporating emotional dissonance. Therapists described emotional labour as intrinsic, emotionally ambivalent and capable of extending beyond the therapy room. Surface acting and emotional dissonance were most consistently linked to exhaustion, burnout and secondary traumatic stress, whereas self-compassion, psychological flexibility and professional identity were associated with more favourable responses to emotional demands. Emotional labour thus appears structurally embedded in psychotherapeutic practice, although the predominantly cross-sectional evidence limits conclusions about temporal and causal relationships, underscoring the need for longitudinal and intervention research.
情绪劳动是心理治疗工作中一个不可或缺但概念上未被充分研究的特征。这一范围回顾描绘了情绪劳动是如何在心理治疗师中被概念化和操作化的,以及与更大的情绪负担和潜在的保护资源相关的相关结果和因素。在JBI和PRISMA-ScR的指导下,PsycINFO、Web of Science和Scopus于2025年8月进行了检索,并于2026年4月更新了以英语或西班牙语发表的关于心理治疗专业人员情绪劳动的同行评议研究。两名评论家独立筛选和绘制记录。14个来源符合纳入标准,包括定量和定性研究。情绪劳动最常见的概念是调节情绪体验和表达以满足专业期望。操作的范围从表面和深层的表演到包含情绪失调的多维模型。治疗师将情绪劳动描述为内在的、情绪矛盾的、能够延伸到治疗室之外的劳动。表面表演和情绪失调最一致地与疲惫、倦怠和继发性创伤压力有关,而自我同情、心理灵活性和职业认同与对情绪需求的更有利反应有关。因此,情绪劳动似乎在结构上嵌入了心理治疗实践,尽管主要的横截面证据限制了关于时间和因果关系的结论,强调了纵向和干预研究的必要性。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.