Workers' Illness, Injury, and Exit From the Home Health Care Services Industry.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sung-Hee Jeon, Yuri Ostrovsky
{"title":"Workers' Illness, Injury, and Exit From the Home Health Care Services Industry.","authors":"Sung-Hee Jeon, Yuri Ostrovsky","doi":"10.1002/ajim.70141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High workforce turnover is among the main challenges facing home health care services industries (HHCS) in many countries. Illness and injury are often mentioned among the main reasons for leaving HHCS. We examine the impact of illness and injury on Canadian workers' exit from HHCS and discuss the implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use linked Canadian longitudinal administrative employment and health microdata from 2009 to 2022, also linked to 2016 Census microdata. Our longitudinal analysis uses the event study framework. We identify HHCS workers' health events using three sources: Records of Employment issued to ill or injured workers, workers' compensation payments, and acute hospitalization records. We use inverse propensity score weighting to balance the characteristics of workers who experienced a health event with those of workers who did not. Estimates for HHCS workers are compared with estimates for workers in long-term care facilities (LTC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Illness and injury rates appear similar in the HHCS and LTC industries. HHCS workers who experience a health event at time t<sub>0</sub> have a lower probability of staying in the industry in t<sub>0</sub> + 1 year (0.839) and in t<sub>0</sub> + 5 (0.472) than comparable HHCS workers who do not (0.880 and 0.524, respectively). However, the differences in the post-t<sub>0</sub> survival profiles between the two groups are small.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Illness and injury are unlikely to play a major role in HHCS workers' decision to leave the industry. Our results highlight the complexity of workforce retention in HHCS and suggest that factors beyond individual health may be more influential in shaping career trajectories.</p>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.70141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High workforce turnover is among the main challenges facing home health care services industries (HHCS) in many countries. Illness and injury are often mentioned among the main reasons for leaving HHCS. We examine the impact of illness and injury on Canadian workers' exit from HHCS and discuss the implications.

Methods: We use linked Canadian longitudinal administrative employment and health microdata from 2009 to 2022, also linked to 2016 Census microdata. Our longitudinal analysis uses the event study framework. We identify HHCS workers' health events using three sources: Records of Employment issued to ill or injured workers, workers' compensation payments, and acute hospitalization records. We use inverse propensity score weighting to balance the characteristics of workers who experienced a health event with those of workers who did not. Estimates for HHCS workers are compared with estimates for workers in long-term care facilities (LTC).

Results: Illness and injury rates appear similar in the HHCS and LTC industries. HHCS workers who experience a health event at time t0 have a lower probability of staying in the industry in t0 + 1 year (0.839) and in t0 + 5 (0.472) than comparable HHCS workers who do not (0.880 and 0.524, respectively). However, the differences in the post-t0 survival profiles between the two groups are small.

Conclusion: Illness and injury are unlikely to play a major role in HHCS workers' decision to leave the industry. Our results highlight the complexity of workforce retention in HHCS and suggest that factors beyond individual health may be more influential in shaping career trajectories.

工人的疾病,伤害和退出家庭保健服务行业。
背景:在许多国家,高劳动力流动率是家庭保健服务行业(HHCS)面临的主要挑战之一。疾病和受伤通常是离开HHCS的主要原因之一。我们研究了疾病和伤害对加拿大工人退出HHCS的影响,并讨论了其含义。方法:我们使用2009年至2022年加拿大纵向行政就业和健康微数据,也与2016年人口普查微数据相关。我们的纵向分析使用事件研究框架。我们使用三种来源来确定hhs工人的健康事件:发给生病或受伤工人的就业记录,工人赔偿支付和急性住院记录。我们使用反向倾向得分加权来平衡经历过健康事件的工人与没有经历过健康事件的工人的特征。将健康护理中心工作人员的估计值与长期护理机构(LTC)工作人员的估计值进行比较。结果:hhs和LTC行业的疾病和伤害率相似。在时间0中经历健康事件的HHCS工人在0 + 1年(0.839)和0 + 5年(0.472)留在该行业的概率低于没有经历过健康事件的HHCS工人(分别为0.880和0.524)。然而,两组患者在10岁后的生存状况差异很小。结论:疾病和伤害不太可能成为hhs工人决定离开行业的主要因素。我们的研究结果突出了医疗保健服务中劳动力保留的复杂性,并表明个人健康以外的因素可能在塑造职业轨迹方面更有影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书