Diagnostic value of endothelial-specific molecule-1 levels in patients with bone tumors.

IF 2.2 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Acta biochimica Polonica Pub Date : 2026-09-10 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/abp.2026.17417
Eyup Senocak, Nurinnisa Ozturk, Adem Keskin, Umit Aygun, Ibrahim Dag, Muhammet Celik
{"title":"Diagnostic value of endothelial-specific molecule-1 levels in patients with bone tumors.","authors":"Eyup Senocak, Nurinnisa Ozturk, Adem Keskin, Umit Aygun, Ibrahim Dag, Muhammet Celik","doi":"10.3389/abp.2026.17417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In suspected bone tumors where imaging and histopathological evaluation are fundamental for diagnosis, minimally invasive blood biomarkers are needed for earlier diagnosis, initial assessment, and risk stratification. The aim of this research was to evaluate the diagnostic value of Endothelial-Specific Molecule-1 (ESM-1) levels in determining the presence of bone tumors and distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional research, conducted at a research hospital, involved 60 participants diagnosed with bone tumors and 30 healthy participants. ESM-1 values were analyzed using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The data obtained were evaluated using binary logistic regression analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ESM-1 values were determined to be higher in the bone tumors group than in the control group. ROC analysis showed an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.895. Using a cut-off value of 138.94 ng/L for detecting bone tumors, the sensitivity and specificity were 78.3% and 80.0%, respectively. In addition, ESM-1, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein levels were found to be higher in the malignant subgroup than in the benign subgroup. In subgroup ROC analysis, ESM-1 perfectly discriminated against malignant tumors from both benign tumors (AUC = 1.000) and healthy controls (AUC = 1.000), with sensitivities and specificities of 100% at cut-off values of 204.54 ng/L and 195.00 ng/L, respectively. For differentiating benign tumors from healthy controls, the AUC was 0.789, with 70.0% sensitivity and 70.0% specificity at a cut-off value of 125.54 ng/L.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESM-1 levels may have potential diagnostic value in distinguishing between bone tumors and malignant tumors; however, these results need to be confirmed in larger samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":6984,"journal":{"name":"Acta biochimica Polonica","volume":"73 ","pages":"17417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13601017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta biochimica Polonica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/abp.2026.17417","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In suspected bone tumors where imaging and histopathological evaluation are fundamental for diagnosis, minimally invasive blood biomarkers are needed for earlier diagnosis, initial assessment, and risk stratification. The aim of this research was to evaluate the diagnostic value of Endothelial-Specific Molecule-1 (ESM-1) levels in determining the presence of bone tumors and distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors.

Methods: This cross-sectional research, conducted at a research hospital, involved 60 participants diagnosed with bone tumors and 30 healthy participants. ESM-1 values were analyzed using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The data obtained were evaluated using binary logistic regression analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: ESM-1 values were determined to be higher in the bone tumors group than in the control group. ROC analysis showed an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.895. Using a cut-off value of 138.94 ng/L for detecting bone tumors, the sensitivity and specificity were 78.3% and 80.0%, respectively. In addition, ESM-1, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein levels were found to be higher in the malignant subgroup than in the benign subgroup. In subgroup ROC analysis, ESM-1 perfectly discriminated against malignant tumors from both benign tumors (AUC = 1.000) and healthy controls (AUC = 1.000), with sensitivities and specificities of 100% at cut-off values of 204.54 ng/L and 195.00 ng/L, respectively. For differentiating benign tumors from healthy controls, the AUC was 0.789, with 70.0% sensitivity and 70.0% specificity at a cut-off value of 125.54 ng/L.

Conclusion: ESM-1 levels may have potential diagnostic value in distinguishing between bone tumors and malignant tumors; however, these results need to be confirmed in larger samples.

内皮特异性分子-1水平在骨肿瘤患者中的诊断价值。
背景:在疑似骨肿瘤中,影像学和组织病理学评估是诊断的基础,需要微创血液生物标志物进行早期诊断、初步评估和风险分层。本研究的目的是评估内皮特异性分子-1 (ESM-1)水平在确定骨肿瘤存在和区分良恶性肿瘤中的诊断价值。方法:这项横断面研究在一家研究医院进行,涉及60名诊断为骨肿瘤的参与者和30名健康参与者。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)分析ESM-1值。采用二元logistic回归分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析对所得资料进行评价。结果:骨肿瘤组的ESM-1值明显高于对照组。ROC分析显示曲线下面积(AUC)为0.895。采用截断值138.94 ng/L检测骨肿瘤,敏感性78.3%,特异性80.0%。此外,恶性亚组的ESM-1、红细胞沉降率和c反应蛋白水平均高于良性亚组。在亚组ROC分析中,ESM-1完全区分良性肿瘤(AUC = 1.000)和健康对照(AUC = 1.000)的恶性肿瘤,在截断值分别为204.54 ng/L和195.00 ng/L时,灵敏度和特异性均为100%。对于良性肿瘤与健康对照的鉴别,AUC为0.789,灵敏度为70.0%,特异性为70.0%,临界值为125.54 ng/L。结论:ESM-1水平对骨肿瘤和恶性肿瘤有潜在的诊断价值;然而,这些结果需要在更大的样本中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta biochimica Polonica
Acta biochimica Polonica 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Biochimica Polonica is a journal covering enzymology and metabolism, membranes and bioenergetics, gene structure and expression, protein, nucleic acid and carbohydrate structure and metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书