Beyond faces: The effect of context on ensemble emotion perception

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Woojeong Lee, Hyeri Yoh, Sang Chul Chong
{"title":"Beyond faces: The effect of context on ensemble emotion perception","authors":"Woojeong Lee,&nbsp;Hyeri Yoh,&nbsp;Sang Chul Chong","doi":"10.3758/s13414-026-03335-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The ability to judge the overall emotion of a crowd is fundamental to navigating naturalistic social scenes. However, research has typically studied such judgments using isolated faces, without any contextual information. In two experiments, this study investigates how facial expressions, background context, and observers’ emotional states jointly influence ensemble emotion perception in naturalistic scenes. In Experiment 1, participants judged the overall emotion of crowd scenes that were constructed by superimposing human figures, whose facial emotional values were quantified on a continuous scale based on naturalistic photographs, onto emotionally positive, negative, or neutral backgrounds. Bayesian model comparisons revealed that both facial emotion and background valence influenced mean judgments, with positive (negative) backgrounds biasing ratings in a more positive (negative) direction. In Experiment 2, we examined how observer mood modulates this integration by inducing positive or negative affect through an autobiographical recall task. Model comparisons revealed that observer mood also influenced judgment, extending the model of Experiment 1. Although observer mood exhibited no reliable main effect on mean ratings, it was found to significantly affect response variability: participants in a positive mood showed reduced variability, which suggests more consistent ensemble judgments. Together, these findings demonstrate that ensemble emotion perception integrates multiple sources of information beyond facial expressions; specifically, both external and internal contexts substantially influence how collective mood is perceived in social scenes. These findings emphasize the importance of studying ensemble perception in naturalistic settings. The trial-level data and analysis codes for all the experiments are available on the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B9GMQ). None of the experiments were preregistered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"88 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-026-03335-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to judge the overall emotion of a crowd is fundamental to navigating naturalistic social scenes. However, research has typically studied such judgments using isolated faces, without any contextual information. In two experiments, this study investigates how facial expressions, background context, and observers’ emotional states jointly influence ensemble emotion perception in naturalistic scenes. In Experiment 1, participants judged the overall emotion of crowd scenes that were constructed by superimposing human figures, whose facial emotional values were quantified on a continuous scale based on naturalistic photographs, onto emotionally positive, negative, or neutral backgrounds. Bayesian model comparisons revealed that both facial emotion and background valence influenced mean judgments, with positive (negative) backgrounds biasing ratings in a more positive (negative) direction. In Experiment 2, we examined how observer mood modulates this integration by inducing positive or negative affect through an autobiographical recall task. Model comparisons revealed that observer mood also influenced judgment, extending the model of Experiment 1. Although observer mood exhibited no reliable main effect on mean ratings, it was found to significantly affect response variability: participants in a positive mood showed reduced variability, which suggests more consistent ensemble judgments. Together, these findings demonstrate that ensemble emotion perception integrates multiple sources of information beyond facial expressions; specifically, both external and internal contexts substantially influence how collective mood is perceived in social scenes. These findings emphasize the importance of studying ensemble perception in naturalistic settings. The trial-level data and analysis codes for all the experiments are available on the Open Science Framework (OSF) repository (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B9GMQ). None of the experiments were preregistered.

情境对整体情绪知觉的影响
判断人群整体情绪的能力是驾驭自然社会场景的基础。然而,研究通常使用孤立的面孔来研究这种判断,没有任何上下文信息。在两个实验中,本研究探讨了面部表情、背景语境和观察者的情绪状态如何共同影响自然场景中的整体情绪感知。在实验1中,参与者对人群场景的整体情绪进行判断,这些场景是通过叠加人物来构建的,这些人物的面部情绪值是基于自然主义照片在连续尺度上量化的,在情绪积极、消极或中性的背景上。贝叶斯模型比较显示,面部情绪和背景效价都影响平均判断,积极(消极)背景偏向于更积极(消极)的方向。在实验2中,我们通过自传体回忆任务考察了观察者情绪如何通过诱导积极或消极影响来调节这种整合。模型比较表明,观察者情绪也影响判断,扩展了实验1的模型。虽然观察者情绪对平均评分没有可靠的主要影响,但发现显著影响反应变异性:积极情绪的参与者表现出较少的变异性,这表明更一致的集合判断。总之,这些发现表明,整体情绪感知整合了面部表情以外的多种信息来源;具体来说,外部和内部环境都对社会场景中集体情绪的感知产生了实质性的影响。这些发现强调了在自然环境中研究整体感知的重要性。所有实验的试验级数据和分析代码可在开放科学框架(OSF)存储库(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B9GMQ)上获得。没有一个实验是预先登记的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书