Development of woven TSA fabric module for hand assistive gloves

IF 3.7 4区 管理学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES
Soah Park, Jeongmin Kim, Ju hyeon Oh, Sanghyun Choi, Dongjun Shin, Sumin Koo
{"title":"Development of woven TSA fabric module for hand assistive gloves","authors":"Soah Park,&nbsp;Jeongmin Kim,&nbsp;Ju hyeon Oh,&nbsp;Sanghyun Choi,&nbsp;Dongjun Shin,&nbsp;Sumin Koo","doi":"10.1186/s40691-026-00486-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wearable assistive gloves often present a trade-off between mechanical assistance and wearability due to bulky, externally mounted actuation systems. This study developed a textile-integrated hand assistive glove by structurally embedding twisted string actuator (TSA) tendon strings into a woven fabric module and evaluated how the textile module influenced assistance performance and user acceptance. By comparing two woven structures (1/1 plain and 3/1 twill), the plain weave structure was selected based on warp-direction mechanical requirements for TSA-driven actuation. Woven modules were fabricated with different weave densities, and a 6 ends-per-inch (epi) configuration was adopted to balance force transmission and frictional resistance during rotational TSA operation. Two module shapes were applied: a flat-type module that is attached to the palmar fingertip and a round-type module enclosing the fingertip in a tapered thimble form. Ten adult male participants evaluated the gloves under four conditions (flat-type, round-type, commercial pneumatic glove, and bare hands). Design perception was assessed using eye tracking and design related questionnaires, assistance performance was evaluated using surface electromyography (sEMG) during a 12 kg static holding task, and wearability was examined using electroencephalography (EEG), clothing pressure, and subjective questionnaires during repetitive object-handling tasks. The sEMG results normalized to the bare-hand reference showed reduced muscle activation for the round type (74.14% RVC) and flat type gloves (85.26% RVC), whereas the pneumatic glove showed a slight increase (105.92% RVC). EEG results did not differ significantly across conditions, while clothing pressure differed across glove types, with the pneumatic glove exhibiting the highest mean pressure. Despite generating higher clothing pressure than the flat type glove, the round type glove received higher ratings for perceived functionality and purchase/use intention, indicating that wearability is not determined solely by physical pressure but is influenced by perceived functional effectiveness. The findings demonstrate that woven module shape plays a decisive role in balancing mechanical assistance and user acceptance, providing experimentally grounded design guidelines for textile-integrated assistive gloves.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":555,"journal":{"name":"Fashion and Textiles","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40691-026-00486-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fashion and Textiles","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40691-026-00486-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wearable assistive gloves often present a trade-off between mechanical assistance and wearability due to bulky, externally mounted actuation systems. This study developed a textile-integrated hand assistive glove by structurally embedding twisted string actuator (TSA) tendon strings into a woven fabric module and evaluated how the textile module influenced assistance performance and user acceptance. By comparing two woven structures (1/1 plain and 3/1 twill), the plain weave structure was selected based on warp-direction mechanical requirements for TSA-driven actuation. Woven modules were fabricated with different weave densities, and a 6 ends-per-inch (epi) configuration was adopted to balance force transmission and frictional resistance during rotational TSA operation. Two module shapes were applied: a flat-type module that is attached to the palmar fingertip and a round-type module enclosing the fingertip in a tapered thimble form. Ten adult male participants evaluated the gloves under four conditions (flat-type, round-type, commercial pneumatic glove, and bare hands). Design perception was assessed using eye tracking and design related questionnaires, assistance performance was evaluated using surface electromyography (sEMG) during a 12 kg static holding task, and wearability was examined using electroencephalography (EEG), clothing pressure, and subjective questionnaires during repetitive object-handling tasks. The sEMG results normalized to the bare-hand reference showed reduced muscle activation for the round type (74.14% RVC) and flat type gloves (85.26% RVC), whereas the pneumatic glove showed a slight increase (105.92% RVC). EEG results did not differ significantly across conditions, while clothing pressure differed across glove types, with the pneumatic glove exhibiting the highest mean pressure. Despite generating higher clothing pressure than the flat type glove, the round type glove received higher ratings for perceived functionality and purchase/use intention, indicating that wearability is not determined solely by physical pressure but is influenced by perceived functional effectiveness. The findings demonstrate that woven module shape plays a decisive role in balancing mechanical assistance and user acceptance, providing experimentally grounded design guidelines for textile-integrated assistive gloves.

手辅助手套机织TSA织物模块的研制
可穿戴的辅助手套通常呈现机械辅助和可穿戴性之间的权衡,由于笨重的,外部安装的驱动系统。本研究通过将扭曲弦致动器(TSA)肌腱串结构嵌入编织织物模块,开发了一种纺织一体化手辅助手套,并评估了纺织模块对辅助性能和用户接受度的影响。通过对比1/1平纹和3/1斜纹两种织物结构,根据tsa驱动驱动的经纬方向力学要求选择平纹结构。采用不同的编织密度制作编织模块,并采用每英寸6个端部(epi)的配置来平衡旋转TSA操作时的力传递和摩擦阻力。应用了两种模块形状:一种是连接到手掌指尖的平面模块,一种是将指尖围成锥形顶针形状的圆形模块。10名成年男性参与者在四种情况下(平面型、圆形、商用气动手套和徒手)评估手套。通过眼动追踪和设计相关问卷评估设计感知,在12公斤静态手持任务中使用表面肌电图(sEMG)评估辅助性能,在重复性物体处理任务中使用脑电图(EEG)、服装压力和主观问卷检查可穿戴性。经归一化后的表面肌电信号结果显示,圆形手套和扁平手套的肌肉激活率分别为74.14%和85.26%,而气动手套的肌肉激活率略有增加(105.92%)。不同条件下的EEG结果没有显著差异,而不同手套类型的衣服压力不同,气动手套的平均压力最高。尽管比扁平型手套产生更高的服装压力,但圆形手套在感知功能和购买/使用意愿方面获得了更高的评分,这表明可穿戴性不仅仅由物理压力决定,而是受到感知功能有效性的影响。研究结果表明,编织模块形状在平衡机械辅助和用户接受度方面起着决定性作用,为纺织集成辅助手套的设计提供了实验基础指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fashion and Textiles
Fashion and Textiles Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Fashion and Textiles aims to advance knowledge and to seek new perspectives in the fashion and textiles industry worldwide. We welcome original research articles, reviews, case studies, book reviews and letters to the editor. The scope of the journal includes the following four technical research divisions: Textile Science and Technology: Textile Material Science and Technology; Dyeing and Finishing; Smart and Intelligent Textiles Clothing Science and Technology: Physiology of Clothing/Textile Products; Protective clothing ; Smart and Intelligent clothing; Sportswear; Mass customization ; Apparel manufacturing Economics of Clothing and Textiles/Fashion Business: Management of the Clothing and Textiles Industry; Merchandising; Retailing; Fashion Marketing; Consumer Behavior; Socio-psychology of Fashion Fashion Design and Cultural Study on Fashion: Aesthetic Aspects of Fashion Product or Design Process; Textiles/Clothing/Fashion Design; Fashion Trend; History of Fashion; Costume or Dress; Fashion Theory; Fashion journalism; Fashion exhibition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书