Rachel Anderson, Abigail Washington, Simran Multani, Bryan Anderson, Thomas Helm
{"title":"Think small: a smarter approach to formalin use in dermatology clinics and offices","authors":"Rachel Anderson, Abigail Washington, Simran Multani, Bryan Anderson, Thomas Helm","doi":"10.1007/s00403-026-04900-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prefilled formalin containers are essential in dermatology for preserving biopsy specimens. However, formalin is a toxic and carcinogenic chemical requiring careful handling and requires proper disposal. Reducing its use without compromising specimen integrity can offer both environmental and financial benefits. We analyzed all skin biopsies performed from January 1 to December 31, 2024, across Penn State Dermatology clinics (<i>N</i> = 11,284). We conducted a theoretical cost and waste assessment comparing three commonly available prefilled formalin container sizes: 20 mL with 10 mL fill (20/10 mL), 40/20 mL, and 60/30 mL. Using institutional pricing and biopsy volumes, we projected cost and formalin waste over 1, 5, and 10 years. The 20/10 mL container had the lowest annual cost at $5,303.48, compared to $6,996.08 and $6,883.24 for the 40/20 mL and 60/30 mL containers, respectively. Currently, the 60/30 mL container is standard across clinics. Transitioning to the 20/10 mL option would reduce formalin waste by 2,256.8 L over 10 years and save approximately $17,000. In addition, new clinic racks designed to secure smaller containers reduce tipping and potential spills, enhancing safety. Switching to smaller formalin containers for skin biopsies is a simple, effective intervention to cut costs, reduce toxic waste, and improve safety in dermatology practice. Further gains could be realized through the adoption of formalin recycling systems. This initiative underscores the importance of sustainable practices in dermatologic care and serves as a model for environmentally conscious clinical decision-making, while also improving safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"318 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-026-04900-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prefilled formalin containers are essential in dermatology for preserving biopsy specimens. However, formalin is a toxic and carcinogenic chemical requiring careful handling and requires proper disposal. Reducing its use without compromising specimen integrity can offer both environmental and financial benefits. We analyzed all skin biopsies performed from January 1 to December 31, 2024, across Penn State Dermatology clinics (N = 11,284). We conducted a theoretical cost and waste assessment comparing three commonly available prefilled formalin container sizes: 20 mL with 10 mL fill (20/10 mL), 40/20 mL, and 60/30 mL. Using institutional pricing and biopsy volumes, we projected cost and formalin waste over 1, 5, and 10 years. The 20/10 mL container had the lowest annual cost at $5,303.48, compared to $6,996.08 and $6,883.24 for the 40/20 mL and 60/30 mL containers, respectively. Currently, the 60/30 mL container is standard across clinics. Transitioning to the 20/10 mL option would reduce formalin waste by 2,256.8 L over 10 years and save approximately $17,000. In addition, new clinic racks designed to secure smaller containers reduce tipping and potential spills, enhancing safety. Switching to smaller formalin containers for skin biopsies is a simple, effective intervention to cut costs, reduce toxic waste, and improve safety in dermatology practice. Further gains could be realized through the adoption of formalin recycling systems. This initiative underscores the importance of sustainable practices in dermatologic care and serves as a model for environmentally conscious clinical decision-making, while also improving safety.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.