AEED: Agentic Edge-AI Engagement Detection for K-12 Classrooms

IF 7.4 3区 教育学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1109/TLT.2026.3724409
Isaac Arnold;Eva Burch;Shenghua Zha;John F. Shelley-Tremblay;Na Gong
{"title":"AEED: Agentic Edge-AI Engagement Detection for K-12 Classrooms","authors":"Isaac Arnold;Eva Burch;Shenghua Zha;John F. Shelley-Tremblay;Na Gong","doi":"10.1109/TLT.2026.3724409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Monitoring classroom participation requires dependable, low-latency, private solutions that work within edge hardware constraints while maintaining meaningful learning connections. On-device inference is conceivable with edge-AI systems, but they rarely analyze input signal importance in real-world classroom scenarios and employ face orientation or gaze as crude proxies. The embodied cognition theory predicts that engagement should be represented in whole-body sensorimotor activity on specific tasks, not only in face configuration, but agentic classroom pipelines have not operationalized this requirement. In this article, we present agentic edge-AI engagement detection (AEED), a cross-disciplinary pipeline that leverages classroom deployment constraints to inform model design, data collection, and system development. In particular, AEED consists of BodyPosture (BP), a model trained on traditional camera-facing body-orientation cues, and FaceReaction (FR), a face model with labels derived from synchronized EEG, ECG, and task performance. In order to examine the impact of input design alongside architectural and platform characteristics, both models operate in parallel under the same tracking, hardware, and logging settings. The pipeline uses commodity edge hardware for interaction recording, dual-model inference, and anonymous student tracking. When camera geometry changes, BP's orientation-based signals invert, whereas FR's physiologically grounded signals correlate with learning outcomes in contexts similar to its training conditions. These results suggest that input design and label construction may matter more than architectural choice for deployment validity, although training-domain differences between the two models remain a partial confound. For agentic AI systems in authentic classrooms, these findings offer a reproducible framework for building embodied, per-student engagement trajectories.","PeriodicalId":49191,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies","volume":"19 ","pages":"863-876"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11673951/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Monitoring classroom participation requires dependable, low-latency, private solutions that work within edge hardware constraints while maintaining meaningful learning connections. On-device inference is conceivable with edge-AI systems, but they rarely analyze input signal importance in real-world classroom scenarios and employ face orientation or gaze as crude proxies. The embodied cognition theory predicts that engagement should be represented in whole-body sensorimotor activity on specific tasks, not only in face configuration, but agentic classroom pipelines have not operationalized this requirement. In this article, we present agentic edge-AI engagement detection (AEED), a cross-disciplinary pipeline that leverages classroom deployment constraints to inform model design, data collection, and system development. In particular, AEED consists of BodyPosture (BP), a model trained on traditional camera-facing body-orientation cues, and FaceReaction (FR), a face model with labels derived from synchronized EEG, ECG, and task performance. In order to examine the impact of input design alongside architectural and platform characteristics, both models operate in parallel under the same tracking, hardware, and logging settings. The pipeline uses commodity edge hardware for interaction recording, dual-model inference, and anonymous student tracking. When camera geometry changes, BP's orientation-based signals invert, whereas FR's physiologically grounded signals correlate with learning outcomes in contexts similar to its training conditions. These results suggest that input design and label construction may matter more than architectural choice for deployment validity, although training-domain differences between the two models remain a partial confound. For agentic AI systems in authentic classrooms, these findings offer a reproducible framework for building embodied, per-student engagement trajectories.
AEED:面向K-12课堂的代理边缘ai参与检测
监控课堂参与需要可靠、低延迟、私有的解决方案,这些解决方案在边缘硬件限制下工作,同时保持有意义的学习联系。边缘人工智能系统的设备上推理是可以想象的,但它们很少在现实世界的课堂场景中分析输入信号的重要性,并使用面部方向或凝视作为粗略的代理。具身认知理论预测,参与应该在特定任务的全身感觉运动活动中表现出来,而不仅仅是面部配置,但代理课堂管道并没有实现这一要求。在本文中,我们介绍了代理边缘人工智能参与检测(AEED),这是一种跨学科的管道,利用课堂部署约束来通知模型设计、数据收集和系统开发。特别是,AEED由BodyPosture (BP)和FaceReaction (FR)组成,前者是一种基于传统面向摄像头的身体方向线索训练的模型,后者是一种基于同步脑电图、心电图和任务表现的面部模型。为了检查输入设计以及架构和平台特征的影响,两个模型在相同的跟踪、硬件和日志设置下并行运行。该管道使用商品边缘硬件进行交互记录、双模型推理和匿名学生跟踪。当摄像机的几何形状发生变化时,BP基于方位的信号会发生反转,而FR基于生理的信号则会在与其训练条件相似的环境中与学习结果相关。这些结果表明,对于部署有效性,输入设计和标签构造可能比架构选择更重要,尽管两个模型之间的训练域差异仍然是部分混淆。对于真实课堂中的人工智能系统,这些发现为构建具体的、每个学生的参与轨迹提供了一个可复制的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies
IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies covers all advances in learning technologies and their applications, including but not limited to the following topics: innovative online learning systems; intelligent tutors; educational games; simulation systems for education and training; collaborative learning tools; learning with mobile devices; wearable devices and interfaces for learning; personalized and adaptive learning systems; tools for formative and summative assessment; tools for learning analytics and educational data mining; ontologies for learning systems; standards and web services that support learning; authoring tools for learning materials; computer support for peer tutoring; learning via computer-mediated inquiry, field, and lab work; social learning techniques; social networks and infrastructures for learning and knowledge sharing; and creation and management of learning objects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书