Real-world safety profile of Levofloxacin: Pharmacovigilance signals, co-medication patterns, and signal validation

Intelligent Pharmacy Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ipha.2026.04.005
Dan Qin, Ao Gao, Chen Li, Pengzhi Zhao, Mengli Chen
{"title":"Real-world safety profile of Levofloxacin: Pharmacovigilance signals, co-medication patterns, and signal validation","authors":"Dan Qin,&nbsp;Ao Gao,&nbsp;Chen Li,&nbsp;Pengzhi Zhao,&nbsp;Mengli Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ipha.2026.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To characterize epidemiological features and co-medication patterns of Levofloxacin-associated adverse events (AEs) using spontaneous reports and cross-validate pharmacovigilance signals against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed spontaneous reports for Levofloxacin from the Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Center (2020–2024). Patient demographics, regimens, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Co-medication patterns were identified using association rule mining. Disproportionality analyses were employed for signal detection, with findings cross-validated in FAERS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 4,353 reports, 7.14% were severe. The median age was 57 years (male-to-female ratio 1.29:1). Parenteral administration for respiratory, urogenital, and skin infections was predominant. Analysis of 575 co-medication cases yielded 11 significant association rules. The reported AEs manifested primarily as skin and appendages disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, and vascular/coagulation disorders, with 96.76% of patients showing favorable outcomes. At the System Organ Class level, 5 significant signals were detected, with general disorders and administration site conditions showing the strongest signal intensity (ROR = 4.98). At the Preferred Term level, 40 signals were identified, 27 of which were cross-validated in FAERS, including infusion site pruritus (highest intensity, ROR = 39.77).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cross-validation with FAERS confirmed Levofloxacin's established safety profile, characterized by frequent Skin and Appendages Disorders and strong signals for injection site reactions. Notably, co-medication patterns suggest caution when combining Levofloxacin with cephalosporins. Individualized risk assessment and vigilant monitoring are essential to mitigate potential risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100682,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Pharmacy","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 261-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949866X26000262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To characterize epidemiological features and co-medication patterns of Levofloxacin-associated adverse events (AEs) using spontaneous reports and cross-validate pharmacovigilance signals against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed spontaneous reports for Levofloxacin from the Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring Center (2020–2024). Patient demographics, regimens, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Co-medication patterns were identified using association rule mining. Disproportionality analyses were employed for signal detection, with findings cross-validated in FAERS.

Results

Among 4,353 reports, 7.14% were severe. The median age was 57 years (male-to-female ratio 1.29:1). Parenteral administration for respiratory, urogenital, and skin infections was predominant. Analysis of 575 co-medication cases yielded 11 significant association rules. The reported AEs manifested primarily as skin and appendages disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, and vascular/coagulation disorders, with 96.76% of patients showing favorable outcomes. At the System Organ Class level, 5 significant signals were detected, with general disorders and administration site conditions showing the strongest signal intensity (ROR = 4.98). At the Preferred Term level, 40 signals were identified, 27 of which were cross-validated in FAERS, including infusion site pruritus (highest intensity, ROR = 39.77).

Conclusions

Cross-validation with FAERS confirmed Levofloxacin's established safety profile, characterized by frequent Skin and Appendages Disorders and strong signals for injection site reactions. Notably, co-medication patterns suggest caution when combining Levofloxacin with cephalosporins. Individualized risk assessment and vigilant monitoring are essential to mitigate potential risks.
左氧氟沙星的真实世界安全性概况:药物警戒信号、联合用药模式和信号验证
目的利用自发报告和美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统(FAERS)交叉验证药物警戒信号,表征左氧氟沙星相关不良事件(ae)的流行病学特征和联合用药模式。方法回顾性分析2020-2024年药物不良反应监测中心自发报告的左氧氟沙星用药情况。对患者的人口统计、治疗方案和临床结果进行了评估。使用关联规则挖掘识别联合用药模式。歧化分析用于信号检测,结果在FAERS中交叉验证。结果4353例报告中,重症占7.14%;中位年龄为57岁(男女比1.29:1)。呼吸道、泌尿生殖系统和皮肤感染以肠外给药为主。对575例共用药病例进行分析,得到11条显著关联规则。报道的不良反应主要表现为皮肤和附属物疾病、胃肠道疾病和血管/凝血疾病,96.76%的患者预后良好。在系统器官分类水平上,检测到5个显著信号,其中一般疾病和给药部位的信号强度最强(ROR = 4.98)。在Preferred Term水平,共识别40个信号,其中27个在FAERS中交叉验证,包括输注部位瘙痒(最高强度,ROR = 39.77)。结论FAERS交叉验证证实了左氧氟沙星的安全性,其特征是皮肤和附属物病变频繁,注射部位反应信号强烈。值得注意的是,联合用药模式提示左氧氟沙星与头孢菌素联合使用时要谨慎。个体化风险评估和警惕监测对于减轻潜在风险至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书