{"title":"Benchmarking sustainability in tissue manufacturing: Evaluating bleaching and effluent treatment practices.","authors":"Joanna Boguniewicz-Zabłocka, Vincenzo Naddeo","doi":"10.1177/0734242X261472583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The production of tissue article from recovered fibers is associated with significant environmental challenges arising from both raw material quality and the intensity of treatment processes. In contrast to many studies in the literature that focus primarily on compliance with emission limit values or the analysis of single parameters, this study proposes a benchmarking approach based on normalized performance indicators referenced to unit production (kg ADt<sup>-1</sup>, kg t<sup>-1</sup>) and encompassing the entire upstream-downstream chain. The analytical framework developed integrates key environmental indicators-water and energy consumption, emissions to water (chemical oxygen demand, adsorbable organic halogens), and sludge generation-thereby enabling a comprehensive, system-oriented assessment consistent with the Best Available Techniques Reference Document (BAT/BREF) framework and CEPI recommendations. The analysis of four case studies demonstrates that the investigated plants operate within CEPI reference ranges; however, the dispersion of key performance indicators reveals considerable scope for further optimization. The results indicate that upstream factors, including bleaching intensity and recovered fiber quality, exert a stronger influence on total pollutant loads and sludge generation than effluent concentrations alone. Downstream treatment processes achieve comparable pollutant removal efficiencies; however, the associated environmental costs, in terms of energy and chemical consumption, are strongly dependent on wastewater characteristic. The findings also confirm the presence of cross-media effects, whereby reductions in emissions to water may lead to increased sludge production or higher energy demand, thereby underscoring the need for integrated, system-level optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":520825,"journal":{"name":"Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA","volume":" ","pages":"734242X261472583"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X261472583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The production of tissue article from recovered fibers is associated with significant environmental challenges arising from both raw material quality and the intensity of treatment processes. In contrast to many studies in the literature that focus primarily on compliance with emission limit values or the analysis of single parameters, this study proposes a benchmarking approach based on normalized performance indicators referenced to unit production (kg ADt-1, kg t-1) and encompassing the entire upstream-downstream chain. The analytical framework developed integrates key environmental indicators-water and energy consumption, emissions to water (chemical oxygen demand, adsorbable organic halogens), and sludge generation-thereby enabling a comprehensive, system-oriented assessment consistent with the Best Available Techniques Reference Document (BAT/BREF) framework and CEPI recommendations. The analysis of four case studies demonstrates that the investigated plants operate within CEPI reference ranges; however, the dispersion of key performance indicators reveals considerable scope for further optimization. The results indicate that upstream factors, including bleaching intensity and recovered fiber quality, exert a stronger influence on total pollutant loads and sludge generation than effluent concentrations alone. Downstream treatment processes achieve comparable pollutant removal efficiencies; however, the associated environmental costs, in terms of energy and chemical consumption, are strongly dependent on wastewater characteristic. The findings also confirm the presence of cross-media effects, whereby reductions in emissions to water may lead to increased sludge production or higher energy demand, thereby underscoring the need for integrated, system-level optimization.
从回收的纤维中生产组织制品与原材料质量和处理过程强度引起的重大环境挑战有关。与文献中的许多研究主要关注排放限值的符合性或单一参数的分析不同,本研究提出了一种基于单位产量(kg ADt-1, kg t-1)的标准化绩效指标的基准方法,涵盖了整个上下下游链。开发的分析框架整合了关键环境指标——水和能源消耗、向水中排放(化学需氧量、可吸附有机卤素)和污泥生成——从而实现了与最佳可用技术参考文件(BAT/BREF)框架和CEPI建议相一致的全面、面向系统的评估。四个案例分析表明,所调查的电厂运行在CEPI参考范围内;然而,关键性能指标的分散显示了进一步优化的相当大的空间。结果表明,上游因素,包括漂白强度和回收纤维质量,对总污染物负荷和污泥生成量的影响比单独的出水浓度更大。下游处理工艺达到相当的污染物去除效率;然而,就能源和化学品消耗而言,相关的环境成本在很大程度上取决于废水的特性。研究结果还证实了跨媒介效应的存在,即减少对水的排放可能导致污泥产量增加或能源需求增加,从而强调了对综合系统级优化的需求。