Current Status and Barriers to Heart Failure Care in Japanese Geriatric Health Services Facilities - A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Circulation Journal Pub Date : 2026-10-23 Epub Date: 2026-09-18 DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-26-0558
Yoshiharu Kinugasa, Miyuki Tsuchihashi-Makaya, Akiko Okada, Masakazu Saitoh, Isao Miyajima, Hiroshi Sakurashita, Koshiro Kanaoka, Dai Yumino, Shungo Hikoso, Koichiro Kinugawa, Kazuhiro Yamamoto
{"title":"Current Status and Barriers to Heart Failure Care in Japanese Geriatric Health Services Facilities - A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Yoshiharu Kinugasa, Miyuki Tsuchihashi-Makaya, Akiko Okada, Masakazu Saitoh, Isao Miyajima, Hiroshi Sakurashita, Koshiro Kanaoka, Dai Yumino, Shungo Hikoso, Koichiro Kinugawa, Kazuhiro Yamamoto","doi":"10.1253/circj.CJ-26-0558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As Japan faces a heart failure (HF) pandemic, geriatric health service facilities (GHSFs) are vital for transitional HF care from hospital to home. This study investigated HF care practices, challenges, and support needs in Japanese GHSFs.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey of 171 GHSFs. We analyzed current management practices, perceived difficulties, and support needs regarding HF care in GHSFs. Concerns over high medication costs for HF were the primary reason for admission refusal (49.7%). Although daily symptom assessments, including dyspnea and edema were common, weight monitoring was conducted only monthly in 50.3% of facilities. HF care infrastructure was inadequate: 99.4% of GHSFs had no specialized staff (e.g., certified HF educators), only 38.0% had access to expert consultation, and only 56.7% provided HF-specific rehabilitation. Consequently, 44.4% of representatives reported significant perceived difficulty in HF care, primarily in judging consultation timing (75.0%). Facilities reporting low/neutral satisfaction with information desired advance care planning (ACP) and consultation criteria. HF patients had significantly lower home discharge rates than the overall facility residents (median [interquartile range] 20.0% [4.1-34.6%] vs. 34.0% [19.0-49.0%]; P<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concerns over financial barriers, along with structural and communication barriers in GHSFs, drive admission refusals and complicate HF management, potentially limiting home discharge. Improving transitional HF care requires addressing these financial concerns, providing standardized staff education and specialized support, and bridging information gaps, specifically regarding ACP and consultation criteria, between hospitals and facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50691,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1735-1744"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-26-0558","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As Japan faces a heart failure (HF) pandemic, geriatric health service facilities (GHSFs) are vital for transitional HF care from hospital to home. This study investigated HF care practices, challenges, and support needs in Japanese GHSFs.

Methods and results: We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey of 171 GHSFs. We analyzed current management practices, perceived difficulties, and support needs regarding HF care in GHSFs. Concerns over high medication costs for HF were the primary reason for admission refusal (49.7%). Although daily symptom assessments, including dyspnea and edema were common, weight monitoring was conducted only monthly in 50.3% of facilities. HF care infrastructure was inadequate: 99.4% of GHSFs had no specialized staff (e.g., certified HF educators), only 38.0% had access to expert consultation, and only 56.7% provided HF-specific rehabilitation. Consequently, 44.4% of representatives reported significant perceived difficulty in HF care, primarily in judging consultation timing (75.0%). Facilities reporting low/neutral satisfaction with information desired advance care planning (ACP) and consultation criteria. HF patients had significantly lower home discharge rates than the overall facility residents (median [interquartile range] 20.0% [4.1-34.6%] vs. 34.0% [19.0-49.0%]; P<0.01).

Conclusions: Concerns over financial barriers, along with structural and communication barriers in GHSFs, drive admission refusals and complicate HF management, potentially limiting home discharge. Improving transitional HF care requires addressing these financial concerns, providing standardized staff education and specialized support, and bridging information gaps, specifically regarding ACP and consultation criteria, between hospitals and facilities.

日本老年保健服务机构心力衰竭护理的现状和障碍——一项全国性的横断面调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation Journal
Circulation Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
471
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Circulation publishes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other content related to cardiovascular health and disease, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in basic and translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书