Informant Perspectives on the Quality of Life of Healthy Older People, and People With Dementia Living in the Community and Care Facilities.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Pascalle Bosboom, Hui Wen Quek, Amy Page, Kelly Banz, Osvaldo P Almeida, Leon Flicker, Nicola T Lautenschlager, Christopher Etherton-Beer
{"title":"Informant Perspectives on the Quality of Life of Healthy Older People, and People With Dementia Living in the Community and Care Facilities.","authors":"Pascalle Bosboom, Hui Wen Quek, Amy Page, Kelly Banz, Osvaldo P Almeida, Leon Flicker, Nicola T Lautenschlager, Christopher Etherton-Beer","doi":"10.1111/ajag.70235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Quality of life (QoL) ratings for people living with dementia appear to be influenced by several factors. This study examined how informant perspectives and place of residence influence agreement between self- and informant-rated QoL of people living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study included 74 healthy older controls, 80 community-dwelling people living with dementia and 351 residing in residential care facilities (RCFs), along with their informants. Quality of life was assessed using the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) scale. Carers provided two ratings: (i) proxy (their estimate of the person's self-rating) and (ii) opinion (their own view of the person's QoL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the control group, self- and informant-rated QoL did not differ significantly. Among community-dwelling people living with dementia, self-rated QoL was higher than both proxy (mean difference 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-4.1) and opinion ratings (mean difference 5.3, 95% CI 3.8-6.8). Similarly, those in RCFs rated their QoL higher than informants. The mean difference between self and opinion rating was greater than the mean difference between self and proxy rating (7.2, 95% CI 6.0, 8.5 for opinion rating, and 5.1, 95% CI 3.8, 6.3 for proxy rating). Discrepancies were greater for people living with dementia residing in RCF than in the community.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Informants tend to underestimate QoL in people living with dementia, particularly in residential care. Informant perspective and dementia severity may influence ratings. Researchers and service providers should consider both self- and informant perspectives when evaluating QoL in people living with dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":"45 3","pages":"e70235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13601966/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Quality of life (QoL) ratings for people living with dementia appear to be influenced by several factors. This study examined how informant perspectives and place of residence influence agreement between self- and informant-rated QoL of people living with dementia.

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included 74 healthy older controls, 80 community-dwelling people living with dementia and 351 residing in residential care facilities (RCFs), along with their informants. Quality of life was assessed using the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) scale. Carers provided two ratings: (i) proxy (their estimate of the person's self-rating) and (ii) opinion (their own view of the person's QoL).

Results: In the control group, self- and informant-rated QoL did not differ significantly. Among community-dwelling people living with dementia, self-rated QoL was higher than both proxy (mean difference 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-4.1) and opinion ratings (mean difference 5.3, 95% CI 3.8-6.8). Similarly, those in RCFs rated their QoL higher than informants. The mean difference between self and opinion rating was greater than the mean difference between self and proxy rating (7.2, 95% CI 6.0, 8.5 for opinion rating, and 5.1, 95% CI 3.8, 6.3 for proxy rating). Discrepancies were greater for people living with dementia residing in RCF than in the community.

Conclusions: Informants tend to underestimate QoL in people living with dementia, particularly in residential care. Informant perspective and dementia severity may influence ratings. Researchers and service providers should consider both self- and informant perspectives when evaluating QoL in people living with dementia.

生活在社区和护理机构的健康老年人和痴呆症患者的生活质量的信息者观点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书