Rehabilitation Strategies for Pediatric Single-Sided Deafness, Including Children with Asymmetric Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.7 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Daniele De Seta, Elisabetta Oliva, Stefano Manca di Villahermosa, Pietro De Luca, Patrizia Mancini, Hilal Dincer D'Alessandro, Fernanda Asprella-Libonati, Rosaria Turchetta, Francesca Yoshie Russo
{"title":"Rehabilitation Strategies for Pediatric Single-Sided Deafness, Including Children with Asymmetric Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Daniele De Seta, Elisabetta Oliva, Stefano Manca di Villahermosa, Pietro De Luca, Patrizia Mancini, Hilal Dincer D'Alessandro, Fernanda Asprella-Libonati, Rosaria Turchetta, Francesca Yoshie Russo","doi":"10.3390/audiolres16050129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to analyze in a comprehensive systematic review the hearing rehabilitation strategies for single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) in children. Current rehabilitative options include contralateral routing of signal (CROS) devices, bone conduction devices, and cochlear implantation (CI). <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE was performed to identify studies on pediatric SSD and AHL rehabilitation published up to 7 July 2025. Reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, and animal studies were excluded. Eligible studies included pediatric populations treated with rehabilitative devices, with outcomes focused on speech perception, auditory performance, binaural hearing, quality of life, and questionnaire-based measures. Study selection followed PRISMA principles. <b>Results:</b> A total of 1527 records were identified by three authors through PubMed/MEDLINE (2003-July 2025) after duplicate removal. Title screening retained 581 studies, and abstract screening retained 267 studies. Fifty-eight full-text papers were assessed for eligibility; 10 were excluded due to overlapping patient cohorts, leaving 48 papers for the qualitative synthesis. Overall, 1622 children were analyzed; 43 studies focused on SSD and five on AHL. <b>Conclusions:</b> Available evidence supports rehabilitation in pediatric SSD and AHL. CROS systems offer a non-surgical and reversible option with benefits in selected listening situations but limited effects on localization. Bone conduction devices may improve hearing in noise and some functional outcomes, especially in conductive indications. CI appears to provide the greatest opportunity to restore bilateral auditory input, particularly when performed early in congenital SSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"16 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13600006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres16050129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to analyze in a comprehensive systematic review the hearing rehabilitation strategies for single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) in children. Current rehabilitative options include contralateral routing of signal (CROS) devices, bone conduction devices, and cochlear implantation (CI). Methods: A systematic review of PubMed/MEDLINE was performed to identify studies on pediatric SSD and AHL rehabilitation published up to 7 July 2025. Reviews, meta-analyses, case reports, and animal studies were excluded. Eligible studies included pediatric populations treated with rehabilitative devices, with outcomes focused on speech perception, auditory performance, binaural hearing, quality of life, and questionnaire-based measures. Study selection followed PRISMA principles. Results: A total of 1527 records were identified by three authors through PubMed/MEDLINE (2003-July 2025) after duplicate removal. Title screening retained 581 studies, and abstract screening retained 267 studies. Fifty-eight full-text papers were assessed for eligibility; 10 were excluded due to overlapping patient cohorts, leaving 48 papers for the qualitative synthesis. Overall, 1622 children were analyzed; 43 studies focused on SSD and five on AHL. Conclusions: Available evidence supports rehabilitation in pediatric SSD and AHL. CROS systems offer a non-surgical and reversible option with benefits in selected listening situations but limited effects on localization. Bone conduction devices may improve hearing in noise and some functional outcomes, especially in conductive indications. CI appears to provide the greatest opportunity to restore bilateral auditory input, particularly when performed early in congenital SSD.

包括非对称听力损失儿童在内的儿童单侧耳聋的康复策略:系统综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书