The Temporal Resolution Needed for Speech Intelligibility Assessed with Mosaic Speech: Effects of Block Duration, Age, and Word Familiarity.

IF 1.7 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Gerard B Remijn, Yuna Uzuhashi, Emi Hasuo, Kazuo Ueda, Yoshitaka Nakajima
{"title":"The Temporal Resolution Needed for Speech Intelligibility Assessed with Mosaic Speech: Effects of Block Duration, Age, and Word Familiarity.","authors":"Gerard B Remijn, Yuna Uzuhashi, Emi Hasuo, Kazuo Ueda, Yoshitaka Nakajima","doi":"10.3390/audiolres16050122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Mosaic speech was used to further investigate the auditory system's temporal resolution needed for speech intelligibility. Mosaic speech is a form of degraded speech segmented in frequency × time blocks with no discernible temporal fine structure and with degraded amplitude envelope cues. <b>Methods</b>: We performed a listening experiment with mosaic speech consisting of 20 frequency bands segmented into 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 ms. Younger listeners (<25 years; <i>n</i> = 20), with self-reported normal hearing and having passed a limited screening test, and elderly listeners (>65 years; <i>n</i> = 19) with hearing thresholds ranging from normal hearing to moderate hearing loss listened to Japanese low- and high-familiarity mosaic words and wrote down what they heard. The original words were included as control stimuli. <b>Results</b>: Although younger listeners had significantly higher intelligibility scores, elderly listeners could integrate and parse coarse blocks of mosaic speech of 20 ms and 40 ms with intelligibility scores of 84% or higher for high-familiarity words. For longer block durations, however, the elderly listeners' intelligibility dropped rapidly for both high- and low-familiarity words. In both the young and the elderly listener groups, intelligibility reached the floor for block durations of 160 and 320 ms. Word familiarity strongly affected intelligibility scores. For blocks up to 80 ms, intelligibility was significantly higher for high-familiarity words than for low-familiarity words in both age groups, with a 10-30% difference. <b>Conclusions</b>: Elderly listeners (<i>n</i> = 19) with normal hearing to moderate hearing loss could maintain relatively high intelligibility for mosaic words segmented in blocks of 20 or 40 ms, provided the words had a high familiarity level.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"16 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13600226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres16050122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Mosaic speech was used to further investigate the auditory system's temporal resolution needed for speech intelligibility. Mosaic speech is a form of degraded speech segmented in frequency × time blocks with no discernible temporal fine structure and with degraded amplitude envelope cues. Methods: We performed a listening experiment with mosaic speech consisting of 20 frequency bands segmented into 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 ms. Younger listeners (<25 years; n = 20), with self-reported normal hearing and having passed a limited screening test, and elderly listeners (>65 years; n = 19) with hearing thresholds ranging from normal hearing to moderate hearing loss listened to Japanese low- and high-familiarity mosaic words and wrote down what they heard. The original words were included as control stimuli. Results: Although younger listeners had significantly higher intelligibility scores, elderly listeners could integrate and parse coarse blocks of mosaic speech of 20 ms and 40 ms with intelligibility scores of 84% or higher for high-familiarity words. For longer block durations, however, the elderly listeners' intelligibility dropped rapidly for both high- and low-familiarity words. In both the young and the elderly listener groups, intelligibility reached the floor for block durations of 160 and 320 ms. Word familiarity strongly affected intelligibility scores. For blocks up to 80 ms, intelligibility was significantly higher for high-familiarity words than for low-familiarity words in both age groups, with a 10-30% difference. Conclusions: Elderly listeners (n = 19) with normal hearing to moderate hearing loss could maintain relatively high intelligibility for mosaic words segmented in blocks of 20 or 40 ms, provided the words had a high familiarity level.

用马赛克语音评估语音可理解性所需的时间分辨率:块持续时间、年龄和单词熟悉度的影响。
背景/目的:利用马赛克语音进一步研究语音可理解性所需的听觉系统时间分辨率。马赛克语音是一种退化的语音分割成频率×时间块的形式,没有可识别的时间精细结构和退化的幅度包络线索。方法:对20、40、80、160、320 ms的20个频段拼接语音进行听力实验。自我报告听力正常并通过有限筛选测试的年轻听众(n = 20)和听力阈值从正常听力到中度听力损失的老年听众(65岁,n = 19)分别听低熟悉度和高熟悉度的日语拼贴词并写下他们听到的内容。原始单词作为对照刺激物。结果:虽然年轻听众的可理解性得分明显高于老年听众,但老年听众可以整合和解析20 ms和40 ms的马赛克语音粗块,对高熟悉度词的可理解性得分达到84%或更高。然而,在较长的分组时间内,老年听众对高熟悉度和低熟悉度单词的理解度都迅速下降。在年轻和老年听者组中,可理解性在160和320毫秒的阻滞时间内达到最低水平。单词熟悉程度强烈影响可理解性分数。在80 ms的记忆块中,两个年龄组中高熟悉度词的可理解性显著高于低熟悉度词的可理解性,差异为10-30%。结论:听力正常至中度听力损失的老年听众(n = 19)在对拼接词的熟悉程度较高的情况下,对拼接词的20或40 ms分段可保持较高的理解度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书