Potions, principles, and the power within: healing between science and spirit in nineteenth-century America.

IF 1.1 2区 哲学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sanaullah Khan
{"title":"Potions, principles, and the power within: healing between science and spirit in nineteenth-century America.","authors":"Sanaullah Khan","doi":"10.1017/mdh.2026.10080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>US-based homeopathic practitioners in the latter half of the nineteenth century made a case for the efficacy of homeopathic remedies by invoking the scientific nature of their therapeutic approach, while also employing notions of spiritual efficacy. This simultaneous use of religion and science helped highlight the body's proclivity to heal in slow and sustainable ways that could be activated with the help of homeopathic remedies. By making a claim to adherence to natural laws and the body's innate ability to heal, homeopaths demonstrated the structured and rational ways in which the body healed. However, over time, by engaging with the medical orthodoxy in strictly scientific terms, it gradually lost its emphasis on psychology and belief in the healing experience, which explains why it would be relegated to a subordinate position, as a fringe or a pseudoscience, by the twentieth century.</p>","PeriodicalId":18275,"journal":{"name":"Medical History","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2026.10080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

US-based homeopathic practitioners in the latter half of the nineteenth century made a case for the efficacy of homeopathic remedies by invoking the scientific nature of their therapeutic approach, while also employing notions of spiritual efficacy. This simultaneous use of religion and science helped highlight the body's proclivity to heal in slow and sustainable ways that could be activated with the help of homeopathic remedies. By making a claim to adherence to natural laws and the body's innate ability to heal, homeopaths demonstrated the structured and rational ways in which the body healed. However, over time, by engaging with the medical orthodoxy in strictly scientific terms, it gradually lost its emphasis on psychology and belief in the healing experience, which explains why it would be relegated to a subordinate position, as a fringe or a pseudoscience, by the twentieth century.

魔药、原则和内在力量:19世纪美国科学与精神之间的治疗。
19世纪下半叶,美国的顺势疗法从业者通过援引其治疗方法的科学性,同时也采用精神功效的概念,为顺势疗法的疗效提出了一个案例。同时使用宗教和科学有助于强调身体的倾向,以缓慢和可持续的方式愈合,可以在顺势疗法的帮助下激活。顺势疗法声称遵循自然法则和身体天生的自愈能力,证明了身体自愈的结构和理性方式。然而,随着时间的推移,由于以严格的科学术语与医学正统接触,它逐渐失去了对心理学的重视和对治疗经验的信仰,这解释了为什么它会在20世纪被降级为从属地位,作为一门边缘科学或伪科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical History
Medical History 医学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical History is a refereed journal devoted to all aspects of the history of medicine and health, with the goal of broadening and deepening the understanding of the field, in the widest sense, by historical studies of the highest quality. It is also the journal of the European Association for the History of Medicine and Health. The membership of the Editorial Board, which includes senior members of the EAHMH, reflects the commitment to the finest international standards in refereeing of submitted papers and the reviewing of books. The journal publishes in English, but welcomes submissions from scholars for whom English is not a first language; language and copy-editing assistance will be provided wherever possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书