{"title":"Age-related changes in front-rear anisotropy of peripersonal space representation.","authors":"Ryo Teraoka, Naoki Kuroda, Wataru Teramoto","doi":"10.1007/s00221-026-07401-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripersonal space (PPS) refers to the multisensory space surrounding the body and plays an important role in interactions with external objects and the preparation of defensive responses. Recent studies suggest that PPS varies as a function of spatial direction. Since PPS is shaped by bodily action capabilities in nearby space, age-related declines in bodily and motor functions may alter PPS representation in older adults. However, whether older adults maintain front-rear anisotropy in PPS similar to that in younger adults, and such spatial characteristics are related to sensorimotor function remains unclear. Older adults performed an audio-tactile PPS task in the front and rear spaces; their performance was compared with data from younger adults. A vibrotactile stimulus was presented while a task-irrelevant sound approached the participant, and participants responded to the tactile stimulus. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test was used to examine older adults' functional mobility. Auditory-facilitation effect was greater in the rear space than in the front space even in older adults, suggesting front-rear differences in PPS-related auditory facilitation. Importantly, this age-related change was direction-specific: no age-group difference was observed in the front space; conversely, the auditory-facilitation effect in the rear space was significantly greater in older adults. In addition, higher TUG scores were associated with a larger front-rear difference in facilitation, indicating relatively greater rear space facilitation in older adults with lower functional mobility. Thus, age-related changes in PPS-related auditory facilitation were particularly evident in the rear space, and functional mobility may be linked to front-rear asymmetry in this facilitation effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"244 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-026-07401-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Peripersonal space (PPS) refers to the multisensory space surrounding the body and plays an important role in interactions with external objects and the preparation of defensive responses. Recent studies suggest that PPS varies as a function of spatial direction. Since PPS is shaped by bodily action capabilities in nearby space, age-related declines in bodily and motor functions may alter PPS representation in older adults. However, whether older adults maintain front-rear anisotropy in PPS similar to that in younger adults, and such spatial characteristics are related to sensorimotor function remains unclear. Older adults performed an audio-tactile PPS task in the front and rear spaces; their performance was compared with data from younger adults. A vibrotactile stimulus was presented while a task-irrelevant sound approached the participant, and participants responded to the tactile stimulus. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test was used to examine older adults' functional mobility. Auditory-facilitation effect was greater in the rear space than in the front space even in older adults, suggesting front-rear differences in PPS-related auditory facilitation. Importantly, this age-related change was direction-specific: no age-group difference was observed in the front space; conversely, the auditory-facilitation effect in the rear space was significantly greater in older adults. In addition, higher TUG scores were associated with a larger front-rear difference in facilitation, indicating relatively greater rear space facilitation in older adults with lower functional mobility. Thus, age-related changes in PPS-related auditory facilitation were particularly evident in the rear space, and functional mobility may be linked to front-rear asymmetry in this facilitation effect.
围个人空间(Peripersonal space, PPS)是指围绕在身体周围的多感官空间,在与外界物体的互动和防御反应的准备中起着重要的作用。最近的研究表明,PPS随着空间方向的变化而变化。由于PPS是由附近空间的身体动作能力形成的,与年龄相关的身体和运动功能下降可能会改变老年人PPS的表现。然而,老年人的PPS是否保持与年轻人相似的前后各向异性,以及这种空间特征与感觉运动功能的关系尚不清楚。老年人在前部和后部空间执行听觉触觉PPS任务;他们的表现与年轻人的数据进行了比较。当一个与任务无关的声音接近被试时,被试会对触觉刺激做出反应。采用TUG (Timed Up and Go)测试来检测老年人的功能活动能力。即使在老年人中,后排空间的听觉促进效应也大于前排空间,提示与pps相关的听觉促进存在前后差异。重要的是,这种与年龄相关的变化是方向特异性的:前部空间没有观察到年龄组差异;相反,老年人后部空间的听觉促进作用明显更大。此外,较高的TUG得分与较大的前后促进差异相关,这表明在功能活动能力较低的老年人中,后排空间促进能力相对较大。因此,pps相关听觉促进的年龄相关变化在后部空间尤为明显,功能活动可能与这种促进效应的前后不对称有关。
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.