Prognostic Value of the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Muhammed Erzurum, Veysel Ozan Tanık, Alperen Taş, Mehmet Taha Özkan, Tuğba Kapanşahin, Mehmet Ali Felekoğlu, Nadire Işık Erol Algül, Faruk Aydınyılmaz, İlkin Guliyev, Kamuran Kalkan
{"title":"Prognostic Value of the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Muhammed Erzurum, Veysel Ozan Tanık, Alperen Taş, Mehmet Taha Özkan, Tuğba Kapanşahin, Mehmet Ali Felekoğlu, Nadire Işık Erol Algül, Faruk Aydınyılmaz, İlkin Guliyev, Kamuran Kalkan","doi":"10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2026.6620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early risk stratification is essential in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) reflects endothelial dysfunction and systemic stress; however, its prognostic value in NSTEMI remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between EASIX and in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center observational study included 1001 consecutive NSTEMI patients hospitalized between January 2015 and August 2025. Endothelial Activation and Stress Index was calculated at admission using lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, and platelet count. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Discriminative performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In-hospital mortality occurred in 41 patients (4.1%). Non-survivors had significantly higher EASIX values than survivors (median 1.76 vs. 0.94, P < .001). In multivariable analysis, EASIX (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.24-2.23; P = .001), GRACE score (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.06; P < .001), and revascularization (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15-0.55; P = .003) remained independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. EASIX demonstrated good discriminative ability (AUC 0.770), and higher levels were associated with worse survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endothelial Activation and Stress Index is an independent and practical predictor of in-hospital mortality in NSTEMI and may aid early risk stratification using routine laboratory data.</p>","PeriodicalId":7835,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2026.6620","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early risk stratification is essential in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) reflects endothelial dysfunction and systemic stress; however, its prognostic value in NSTEMI remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between EASIX and in-hospital mortality in patients with NSTEMI.

Methods: This retrospective, single-center observational study included 1001 consecutive NSTEMI patients hospitalized between January 2015 and August 2025. Endothelial Activation and Stress Index was calculated at admission using lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, and platelet count. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Discriminative performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results: In-hospital mortality occurred in 41 patients (4.1%). Non-survivors had significantly higher EASIX values than survivors (median 1.76 vs. 0.94, P < .001). In multivariable analysis, EASIX (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.24-2.23; P = .001), GRACE score (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.06; P < .001), and revascularization (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15-0.55; P = .003) remained independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. EASIX demonstrated good discriminative ability (AUC 0.770), and higher levels were associated with worse survival.

Conclusion: Endothelial Activation and Stress Index is an independent and practical predictor of in-hospital mortality in NSTEMI and may aid early risk stratification using routine laboratory data.

内皮活化和应激指数在非st段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的预后价值。
背景:早期风险分层对非st段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者至关重要。内皮激活和应激指数(EASIX)反映内皮功能障碍和全身应激;然而,其在NSTEMI中的预后价值尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨EASIX与非stemi患者住院死亡率之间的关系。方法:这项回顾性、单中心观察性研究纳入了2015年1月至2025年8月期间住院的1001例连续NSTEMI患者。入院时用乳酸脱氢酶、肌酐和血小板计数计算内皮活化和应激指数。进行单变量和多变量logistic回归分析以确定住院死亡率的独立预测因素。采用受试者工作特征分析和Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估鉴别表现。结果:住院死亡41例(4.1%)。非幸存者的EASIX值显著高于幸存者(中位数1.76比0.94,P < 0.001)。在多变量分析中,EASIX (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.24-2.23; P = .001)、GRACE评分(OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03-1.06; P < .001)和血流量重建(OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.15-0.55; P = .003)仍然是院内死亡率的独立预测因子。EASIX表现出良好的鉴别能力(AUC为0.770),较高的水平与较差的生存率相关。结论:内皮细胞激活和应激指数是NSTEMI患者住院死亡率的一个独立且实用的预测指标,可能有助于使用常规实验室数据进行早期风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
270
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology is an international monthly periodical on cardiology published on independent, unbiased, double-blinded and peer-review principles. The journal’s publication language is English. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology aims to publish qualified and original clinical, experimental and basic research on cardiology at the international level. The journal’s scope also covers editorial comments, reviews of innovations in medical education and practice, case reports, original images, scientific letters, educational articles, letters to the editor, articles on publication ethics, diagnostic puzzles, and issues in social cardiology. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents, and general practitioners working in the fields of adult cardiology, pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery and internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书