Maria Carolina Costa, Miguel Campos, Marco Silva, Aline Martins Pinheiro, M Salomé Duarte, João R Sousa, Carlos Afonso Teixeira
{"title":"Process-oriented screening of agro-industrial waste streams for co-digestion in WWTP anaerobic digesters.","authors":"Maria Carolina Costa, Miguel Campos, Marco Silva, Aline Martins Pinheiro, M Salomé Duarte, João R Sousa, Carlos Afonso Teixeira","doi":"10.1080/09593330.2026.2735890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wastewater utilities require a systematic method for screening agro-industrial co-substrates before testing them in sewage-sludge digesters. This study developed and applied a hierarchical preliminary screening framework based on physicochemical characterisation, biochemical methane potential assays, first-order kinetic modelling, and volumetric methane production. Seven waste streams were evaluated individually: a fat-rich fraction recovered from meat-processing wash water, four meat-processing wash waters, used cooking oil, and confectionery-production wash water. Eight fixed-ratio mixtures were then assessed using selected meat-processing streams, cheese whey, olive mill wastewater, and winery wastewater. Specific methane production of the individual waste streams ranged from 0.087 to 0.969 m³ CH₄ kg<sup>-</sup>¹ VS. Across the mixtures, final SMP ranged from 0.390 to 0.855 m³ CH₄ kg<sup>-</sup>¹ VS and t₉₀ from 9.0 to 23.3 d. TS, VS, and COD were associated with volumetric methane production at days 10 and 30 but not with final SMP, k, or t₉₀. The COD-VMP10 and TS-VMP30 models explained 87.5% and 86.0% of the variability, showing that volumetric methane output was influenced by feedstock concentration. Biochemical compatibility was classified using final SMP, t₉₀, and evidence of sustained methane suppression; VMP10 and VMP30 then refined priorities within each category. The cheese whey + meat-processing wash water R2 mixture (M1; 1:1 v/v) was prioritised because it combined high SMP (0.792 m³ CH₄ kg<sup>-</sup>¹ VS), rapid apparent conversion (t₉₀ = 11.8 d), and the highest volumetric relevance. The framework converts physicochemical and BMP-derived results into a traceable basis for selecting external co-substrates for subsequent controlled validation with municipal sludge.</p>","PeriodicalId":12009,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology","volume":" ","pages":"3312-3325"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2026.2735890","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Wastewater utilities require a systematic method for screening agro-industrial co-substrates before testing them in sewage-sludge digesters. This study developed and applied a hierarchical preliminary screening framework based on physicochemical characterisation, biochemical methane potential assays, first-order kinetic modelling, and volumetric methane production. Seven waste streams were evaluated individually: a fat-rich fraction recovered from meat-processing wash water, four meat-processing wash waters, used cooking oil, and confectionery-production wash water. Eight fixed-ratio mixtures were then assessed using selected meat-processing streams, cheese whey, olive mill wastewater, and winery wastewater. Specific methane production of the individual waste streams ranged from 0.087 to 0.969 m³ CH₄ kg-¹ VS. Across the mixtures, final SMP ranged from 0.390 to 0.855 m³ CH₄ kg-¹ VS and t₉₀ from 9.0 to 23.3 d. TS, VS, and COD were associated with volumetric methane production at days 10 and 30 but not with final SMP, k, or t₉₀. The COD-VMP10 and TS-VMP30 models explained 87.5% and 86.0% of the variability, showing that volumetric methane output was influenced by feedstock concentration. Biochemical compatibility was classified using final SMP, t₉₀, and evidence of sustained methane suppression; VMP10 and VMP30 then refined priorities within each category. The cheese whey + meat-processing wash water R2 mixture (M1; 1:1 v/v) was prioritised because it combined high SMP (0.792 m³ CH₄ kg-¹ VS), rapid apparent conversion (t₉₀ = 11.8 d), and the highest volumetric relevance. The framework converts physicochemical and BMP-derived results into a traceable basis for selecting external co-substrates for subsequent controlled validation with municipal sludge.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Technology is a leading journal for the rapid publication of science and technology papers on a wide range of topics in applied environmental studies, from environmental engineering to environmental biotechnology, the circular economy, municipal and industrial wastewater management, drinking-water treatment, air- and water-pollution control, solid-waste management, industrial hygiene and associated technologies.
Environmental Technology is intended to provide rapid publication of new developments in environmental technology. The journal has an international readership with a broad scientific base. Contributions will be accepted from scientists and engineers in industry, government and universities. Accepted manuscripts are generally published within four months.
Please note that Environmental Technology does not publish any review papers unless for a specified special issue which is decided by the Editor. Please do submit your review papers to our sister journal Environmental Technology Reviews at http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tetr20/current