Practical Pipetting Optimization Strategies for Accurate Concentration Measurement of High-Concentration Protein Formulations

IF 5.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Shang-Yin Wu, Yun-Jie He, Ci Qian, Si-Ru Zhong, Hong-Xing Xiao, Changyun Xiong, Bin Di, Wei-Jie Fang
{"title":"Practical Pipetting Optimization Strategies for Accurate Concentration Measurement of High-Concentration Protein Formulations","authors":"Shang-Yin Wu,&nbsp;Yun-Jie He,&nbsp;Ci Qian,&nbsp;Si-Ru Zhong,&nbsp;Hong-Xing Xiao,&nbsp;Changyun Xiong,&nbsp;Bin Di,&nbsp;Wei-Jie Fang","doi":"10.1208/s12249-026-03553-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High-concentration protein formulations for subcutaneous administration have developed rapidly, while viscosity-related pipetting errors remain a key bottleneck for accurate protein concentration quantification, with commercial detection instruments showing significant limitations in direct measurement of these samples. Here, we developed two pipetting-optimized quantification strategies using two high-concentration monoclonal antibody formulations with distinct viscosities as models: a motorized continuous pipette-based direct measurement method and a weight-corrected method. We validated the high accuracy and repeatability of the motorized continuous pipette for high-viscosity liquid handling, and systematically compared the performance of our optimized methods with the traditional manual pipetting method and three mainstream commercial protein analyzers. Direct measurements using the three evaluated analyzers showed formulation-dependent deviations under the tested conditions. Both optimized workflows improved pipetting precision and provided concentration estimates with improved repeatability for the two high-concentration mAb formulations examined. These findings support motorized pipetting and weight correction as practical options when viscosity compromises volumetric transfer, while their applicability to other protein modalities and formulations with intermediate viscosity requires further validation.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":6925,"journal":{"name":"AAPS PharmSciTech","volume":"27 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS PharmSciTech","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1208/s12249-026-03553-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-concentration protein formulations for subcutaneous administration have developed rapidly, while viscosity-related pipetting errors remain a key bottleneck for accurate protein concentration quantification, with commercial detection instruments showing significant limitations in direct measurement of these samples. Here, we developed two pipetting-optimized quantification strategies using two high-concentration monoclonal antibody formulations with distinct viscosities as models: a motorized continuous pipette-based direct measurement method and a weight-corrected method. We validated the high accuracy and repeatability of the motorized continuous pipette for high-viscosity liquid handling, and systematically compared the performance of our optimized methods with the traditional manual pipetting method and three mainstream commercial protein analyzers. Direct measurements using the three evaluated analyzers showed formulation-dependent deviations under the tested conditions. Both optimized workflows improved pipetting precision and provided concentration estimates with improved repeatability for the two high-concentration mAb formulations examined. These findings support motorized pipetting and weight correction as practical options when viscosity compromises volumetric transfer, while their applicability to other protein modalities and formulations with intermediate viscosity requires further validation.

Graphical Abstract

实用移液优化策略用于高浓度蛋白质制剂的精确浓度测量。
用于皮下给药的高浓度蛋白质制剂发展迅速,而与粘度相关的移液误差仍然是准确定量蛋白质浓度的关键瓶颈,商业检测仪器在直接测量这些样品方面显示出显着的局限性。在这里,我们以两种具有不同粘度的高浓度单克隆抗体配方为模型,开发了两种移液管优化的定量策略:基于电动连续移液管的直接测量方法和重量校正方法。验证了电动连续移液器处理高粘度液体的高精度和重复性,并与传统的手动移液方法和三种主流的商用蛋白质分析仪进行了系统的比较。使用三个评估分析仪的直接测量显示在测试条件下与配方相关的偏差。这两种优化的工作流程都提高了移液精度,并为检测的两种高浓度单抗配方提供了可重复性更高的浓度估计。这些发现支持电动移液和重量校正在粘度影响体积转移时作为实用选择,而它们对其他中等粘度的蛋白质模式和配方的适用性需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AAPS PharmSciTech
AAPS PharmSciTech 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
264
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: AAPS PharmSciTech is a peer-reviewed, online-only journal committed to serving those pharmaceutical scientists and engineers interested in the research, development, and evaluation of pharmaceutical dosage forms and delivery systems, including drugs derived from biotechnology and the manufacturing science pertaining to the commercialization of such dosage forms. Because of its electronic nature, AAPS PharmSciTech aspires to utilize evolving electronic technology to enable faster and diverse mechanisms of information delivery to its readership. Submission of uninvited expert reviews and research articles are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书