Gastric emptying. Risk versus benefit in the treatment of acute poisoning.

D H Wheeler-Usher, L A Wanke, M J Bayer
{"title":"Gastric emptying. Risk versus benefit in the treatment of acute poisoning.","authors":"D H Wheeler-Usher,&nbsp;L A Wanke,&nbsp;M J Bayer","doi":"10.1007/BF03259833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review examines the various clinical options used to elicit gastric emptying, viz. drug-induced emesis, mechanical pharyngeal stimulation, gastric lavage, and catharsis. Apomorphine and syrup of ipecac are the 2 drugs most frequently used for induction of emesis. Both agents act centrally and, in addition, syrup of ipecac has a peripheral action. Toxins ingested or foods previously eaten may inhibit or enhance emetic action by interfering with mediating and conducting mechanisms. Studies indicate that both syrup of ipecac and apomorphine are similarly effective in inducing emesis; however, apomorphine has a shorter reaction time compared with syrup of ipecac. There are more risks involved with the use of apomorphine, since it causes central nervous system and respiratory depression. Syrup of ipecac has been shown to be relatively safe when used in its recommended dosage for emesis. However, several toxicities have been reported with the use of the fluid extract of ipecac. Emesis is contraindicated in patients who are obtunded or comatose, and in patients who have ingested stimulants, some hydrocarbons, or corrosives. Mechanical pharyngeal stimulation is a simple method of inducing emesis; however, it is often unsuccessful and rarely recovers a significant portion of the gastric contents. Gastric lavage is a procedure which has been relied upon for over a century. Its effectiveness is dependent on the nature, form, and dosage of the poison, latency between time of ingestion and lavage, and technique. In clinical experiments studying gastric lavage, it has been noted that the procedure is most beneficial 1 to 2 hours postingestion for the majority of poison ingestions. Lavage also provides an excellent route for activated charcoal and selected antidotes. Gastric lavage may pose several risks to the patient, including obstruction and contamination of the airways and oesophageal damage. Contraindications for gastric lavage are similar to those for emesis except that it may be safer to use in obtunded, comatose, or uncooperative patients. Cathartics used during initial poisoning therapy are usually the saline cathartics. They elicit an osmotic reaction in the small intestine which results in increased intraluminal fluid bulk, hyperperistalsis, and subsequent propulsion of contents. Cathartics have also been shown to stimulate the secretion of cholecystokinin, which is thought to have similar effects on the intestine. Cathartics have not been shown to significantly enhance drug elimination from the gastrointestinal tract.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77871,"journal":{"name":"Medical toxicology","volume":"1 2","pages":"142-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03259833","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03259833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

This review examines the various clinical options used to elicit gastric emptying, viz. drug-induced emesis, mechanical pharyngeal stimulation, gastric lavage, and catharsis. Apomorphine and syrup of ipecac are the 2 drugs most frequently used for induction of emesis. Both agents act centrally and, in addition, syrup of ipecac has a peripheral action. Toxins ingested or foods previously eaten may inhibit or enhance emetic action by interfering with mediating and conducting mechanisms. Studies indicate that both syrup of ipecac and apomorphine are similarly effective in inducing emesis; however, apomorphine has a shorter reaction time compared with syrup of ipecac. There are more risks involved with the use of apomorphine, since it causes central nervous system and respiratory depression. Syrup of ipecac has been shown to be relatively safe when used in its recommended dosage for emesis. However, several toxicities have been reported with the use of the fluid extract of ipecac. Emesis is contraindicated in patients who are obtunded or comatose, and in patients who have ingested stimulants, some hydrocarbons, or corrosives. Mechanical pharyngeal stimulation is a simple method of inducing emesis; however, it is often unsuccessful and rarely recovers a significant portion of the gastric contents. Gastric lavage is a procedure which has been relied upon for over a century. Its effectiveness is dependent on the nature, form, and dosage of the poison, latency between time of ingestion and lavage, and technique. In clinical experiments studying gastric lavage, it has been noted that the procedure is most beneficial 1 to 2 hours postingestion for the majority of poison ingestions. Lavage also provides an excellent route for activated charcoal and selected antidotes. Gastric lavage may pose several risks to the patient, including obstruction and contamination of the airways and oesophageal damage. Contraindications for gastric lavage are similar to those for emesis except that it may be safer to use in obtunded, comatose, or uncooperative patients. Cathartics used during initial poisoning therapy are usually the saline cathartics. They elicit an osmotic reaction in the small intestine which results in increased intraluminal fluid bulk, hyperperistalsis, and subsequent propulsion of contents. Cathartics have also been shown to stimulate the secretion of cholecystokinin, which is thought to have similar effects on the intestine. Cathartics have not been shown to significantly enhance drug elimination from the gastrointestinal tract.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

胃排空。急性中毒治疗的风险与收益。
本综述探讨了各种用于诱发胃排空的临床选择,即药物性呕吐、机械咽刺激、洗胃和泻胃。阿波吗啡和吐根糖浆是诱导呕吐最常用的两种药物。这两种药物都有中枢作用,此外,吐根糖浆有外周作用。摄入的毒素或以前吃过的食物可能通过干扰调解和传导机制来抑制或增强呕吐作用。研究表明吐根糖浆和阿波吗啡在诱导呕吐方面同样有效;但与吐根糖浆相比,阿波啡的反应时间较短。使用阿波啡有更多的风险,因为它会导致中枢神经系统和呼吸抑制。吐根糖浆已被证明是相对安全的,当使用其推荐剂量呕吐。然而,据报道,使用吐根的液体提取物有几种毒性。呕吐忌用于昏厥或昏迷患者,以及摄入兴奋剂、某些碳氢化合物或腐蚀性药物的患者。机械咽刺激是一种简单的诱导呕吐的方法;然而,它往往是不成功的,很少恢复胃内容物的显著部分。洗胃是一种使用了一个多世纪的方法。其效果取决于毒药的性质、形式和剂量、服食和灌洗之间的潜伏期以及方法。在研究洗胃的临床实验中,已经注意到该程序在大多数毒物摄入后1至2小时最有益。灌洗也为活性炭和选定的解毒剂提供了极好的途径。洗胃可能会给病人带来一些风险,包括气道阻塞和污染以及食管损伤。洗胃的禁忌症与呕吐的禁忌症相似,但用于昏厥、昏迷或不配合的患者可能更安全。在最初的中毒治疗中使用的泻药通常是盐水泻药。它们在小肠中引起渗透反应,导致腔内液体体积增加、过度蠕动和随后的内容物推进。泻药也被证明能刺激胆囊收缩素的分泌,这被认为对肠道有类似的作用。目前还没有证据表明,泻药能显著增强胃肠道的药物消除。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书