Gut microbiota beta-diversity and genus-level differential abundance in GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY: A pilot study

IF 0.3 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.cnd.2026.08.015
Érika Duarte Ostemberg, Jullyanne Gil, Luma de Sousa Silva, Maria Fernanda Pessoa Maia, Gabriella de Medeiros Abreu, Eliane Lopes Rosado, Mário Campos Junior
{"title":"Gut microbiota beta-diversity and genus-level differential abundance in GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY: A pilot study","authors":"Érika Duarte Ostemberg,&nbsp;Jullyanne Gil,&nbsp;Luma de Sousa Silva,&nbsp;Maria Fernanda Pessoa Maia,&nbsp;Gabriella de Medeiros Abreu,&nbsp;Eliane Lopes Rosado,&nbsp;Mário Campos Junior","doi":"10.1016/j.cnd.2026.08.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate differences in gut microbiota (GM) beta-diversity and genus-level differential abundance between individuals with glucokinase-maturity-onset diabetes of the young (GCK-MODY) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-alpha (HNF1A-MODY).</div></div><div>To investigate differences in gut microbiota (GM) beta-diversity and genus-level differential abundance between individuals with glucokinase-maturity-onset diabetes of the young (GCK-MODY) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-alpha (HNF1A-MODY).</div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This observational study included 33 individuals with genetically confirmed MODY caused by pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the GCK (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->16) and HNF1A (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->17) genes, classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Participants had a mean age of 38.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14.7 years. Blood samples were collected for genetic analysis, and fecal samples were obtained using a swab-based stool collection kit for DNA extraction and <em>16S rRNA</em> gene sequencing. GM beta-diversity was assessed using Bray–Curtis, Jaccard, unweighted UniFrac, and weighted UniFrac distance metrics. Differential abundance analyses at the genus level were performed using LinDA, limma-voom, and MaAsLin2. Statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.2.1, with <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05 considered statistically significant. The study received ethical approval from HUCFF/UFRJ (CAAE 04232512.4.0000.5257), IPPMG/UFRJ (Approval No. 6.126.045), and IOC/FIOCRUZ (CAAE 44726720.4.0000.5248).</div></div><div>This observational study included 33 individuals with genetically confirmed MODY caused by pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the GCK (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->16) and HNF1A (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->17) genes, classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Participants had a mean age of 38.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->14.7 years. Blood samples were collected for genetic analysis, and fecal samples were obtained using a swab-based stool collection kit for DNA extraction and <em>16S rRNA</em> gene sequencing. GM beta-diversity was assessed using Bray–Curtis, Jaccard, unweighted UniFrac, and weighted UniFrac distance metrics. Differential abundance analyses at the genus level were performed using LinDA, limma-voom, and MaAsLin2. Statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.2.1, with <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05 considered statistically significant. The study received ethical approval from HUCFF/UFRJ (CAAE 04232512.4.0000.5257), IPPMG/UFRJ (Approval No. 6.126.045), and IOC/FIOCRUZ (CAAE 44726720.4.0000.5248).</div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant differences in beta-diversity were observed between groups. Weighted UniFrac analysis suggested differences in GM community structure between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals (PERMANOVA, R<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.078, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014), although statistical significance was not maintained after multiple-testing correction (adjusted <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.072). Differential abundance analyses did not identify any genera that remained significant after false discovery rate correction. However, Enterorhabdus, Anaerotruncus, and Collinsella consistently showed higher abundance in HNF1A-MODY across analytical approaches. The strongest association was observed for an uncultured genus identified by MaAsLin2 (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0004; FDR-adjusted <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.071). These taxa have been implicated in metabolic and inflammatory processes including glucose and lipid metabolism.</div></div><div>No significant differences in beta-diversity were observed between groups. Weighted UniFrac analysis suggested differences in GM community structure between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals (PERMANOVA, R<sup>2</sup> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.078, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014), although statistical significance was not maintained after multiple-testing correction (adjusted <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.072). Differential abundance analyses did not identify any genera that remained significant after false discovery rate correction. However, Enterorhabdus, Anaerotruncus, and Collinsella consistently showed higher abundance in HNF1A-MODY across analytical approaches. The strongest association was observed for an uncultured genus identified by MaAsLin2 (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0004; FDR-adjusted <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.071). These taxa have been implicated in metabolic and inflammatory processes including glucose and lipid metabolism.</div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Although no genera remained significantly different after multiple-testing correction, weighted UniFrac analysis and consistent abundance patterns across multiple analytical methods suggest potential differences in GM composition between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals. These preliminary findings support further investigation to better characterize GM profiles associated with distinct MODY subtypes.</div></div><div>Although no genera remained significantly different after multiple-testing correction, weighted UniFrac analysis and consistent abundance patterns across multiple analytical methods suggest potential differences in GM composition between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals. These preliminary findings support further investigation to better characterize GM profiles associated with distinct MODY subtypes.</div>","PeriodicalId":43722,"journal":{"name":"CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE","volume":"61 ","pages":"Page e9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000799602600091X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate differences in gut microbiota (GM) beta-diversity and genus-level differential abundance between individuals with glucokinase-maturity-onset diabetes of the young (GCK-MODY) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-alpha (HNF1A-MODY).
To investigate differences in gut microbiota (GM) beta-diversity and genus-level differential abundance between individuals with glucokinase-maturity-onset diabetes of the young (GCK-MODY) and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-alpha (HNF1A-MODY).

Methods

This observational study included 33 individuals with genetically confirmed MODY caused by pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the GCK (n = 16) and HNF1A (n = 17) genes, classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Participants had a mean age of 38.3 ± 14.7 years. Blood samples were collected for genetic analysis, and fecal samples were obtained using a swab-based stool collection kit for DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. GM beta-diversity was assessed using Bray–Curtis, Jaccard, unweighted UniFrac, and weighted UniFrac distance metrics. Differential abundance analyses at the genus level were performed using LinDA, limma-voom, and MaAsLin2. Statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.2.1, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The study received ethical approval from HUCFF/UFRJ (CAAE 04232512.4.0000.5257), IPPMG/UFRJ (Approval No. 6.126.045), and IOC/FIOCRUZ (CAAE 44726720.4.0000.5248).
This observational study included 33 individuals with genetically confirmed MODY caused by pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in the GCK (n = 16) and HNF1A (n = 17) genes, classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines. Participants had a mean age of 38.3 ± 14.7 years. Blood samples were collected for genetic analysis, and fecal samples were obtained using a swab-based stool collection kit for DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. GM beta-diversity was assessed using Bray–Curtis, Jaccard, unweighted UniFrac, and weighted UniFrac distance metrics. Differential abundance analyses at the genus level were performed using LinDA, limma-voom, and MaAsLin2. Statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.2.1, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. The study received ethical approval from HUCFF/UFRJ (CAAE 04232512.4.0000.5257), IPPMG/UFRJ (Approval No. 6.126.045), and IOC/FIOCRUZ (CAAE 44726720.4.0000.5248).

Results

No significant differences in beta-diversity were observed between groups. Weighted UniFrac analysis suggested differences in GM community structure between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals (PERMANOVA, R2 = 0.078, P = 0.014), although statistical significance was not maintained after multiple-testing correction (adjusted P = 0.072). Differential abundance analyses did not identify any genera that remained significant after false discovery rate correction. However, Enterorhabdus, Anaerotruncus, and Collinsella consistently showed higher abundance in HNF1A-MODY across analytical approaches. The strongest association was observed for an uncultured genus identified by MaAsLin2 (P = 0.0004; FDR-adjusted P = 0.071). These taxa have been implicated in metabolic and inflammatory processes including glucose and lipid metabolism.
No significant differences in beta-diversity were observed between groups. Weighted UniFrac analysis suggested differences in GM community structure between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals (PERMANOVA, R2 = 0.078, P = 0.014), although statistical significance was not maintained after multiple-testing correction (adjusted P = 0.072). Differential abundance analyses did not identify any genera that remained significant after false discovery rate correction. However, Enterorhabdus, Anaerotruncus, and Collinsella consistently showed higher abundance in HNF1A-MODY across analytical approaches. The strongest association was observed for an uncultured genus identified by MaAsLin2 (P = 0.0004; FDR-adjusted P = 0.071). These taxa have been implicated in metabolic and inflammatory processes including glucose and lipid metabolism.

Conclusion

Although no genera remained significantly different after multiple-testing correction, weighted UniFrac analysis and consistent abundance patterns across multiple analytical methods suggest potential differences in GM composition between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals. These preliminary findings support further investigation to better characterize GM profiles associated with distinct MODY subtypes.
Although no genera remained significantly different after multiple-testing correction, weighted UniFrac analysis and consistent abundance patterns across multiple analytical methods suggest potential differences in GM composition between GCK-MODY and HNF1A-MODY individuals. These preliminary findings support further investigation to better characterize GM profiles associated with distinct MODY subtypes.
GCK-MODY和HNF1A-MODY的肠道微生物群β -多样性和属级丰度差异:一项初步研究
目的探讨葡萄糖激酶成熟型糖尿病(GCK-MODY)和肝细胞核因子1- α (HNF1A-MODY)患者肠道微生物群(GM) β -多样性和属级丰度差异。研究葡萄糖激酶成熟型糖尿病(GCK-MODY)和肝细胞核因子1- α (HNF1A-MODY)患者之间肠道微生物群(GM) β -多样性和属级丰度差异。方法本观察性研究纳入33例经遗传学证实由GCK (n = 16)和HNF1A (n = 17)基因致病性或可能致病性变异引起的MODY患者,根据美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院指南进行分类。参与者的平均年龄为38.3±14.7岁。采集血样进行基因分析,粪便样本采用拭子粪便采集试剂盒进行DNA提取和16S rRNA基因测序。采用Bray-Curtis、Jaccard、un加权UniFrac和加权UniFrac距离指标评估转基因β多样性。采用LinDA、limma- oom和MaAsLin2进行属水平的差异丰度分析。R版本4.2.1进行统计学分析,P <; 0.05认为有统计学意义。该研究获得了huff /UFRJ (CAAE 04232512.4.0000.5257)、IPPMG/UFRJ(批准号6.126.045)和IOC/FIOCRUZ (CAAE 44726720.4.0000.5248)的伦理批准。本观察性研究纳入了33例经遗传学证实由GCK (n = 16)和HNF1A (n = 17)基因致病性或可能致病性变异引起的MODY患者,根据美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院指南进行分类。参与者的平均年龄为38.3±14.7岁。采集血样进行基因分析,粪便样本采用拭子粪便采集试剂盒进行DNA提取和16S rRNA基因测序。采用Bray-Curtis、Jaccard、un加权UniFrac和加权UniFrac距离指标评估转基因β多样性。采用LinDA、limma- oom和MaAsLin2进行属水平的差异丰度分析。R版本4.2.1进行统计学分析,P <; 0.05认为有统计学意义。该研究获得了huff /UFRJ (CAAE 04232512.4.0000.5257)、IPPMG/UFRJ(批准号6.126.045)和IOC/FIOCRUZ (CAAE 44726720.4.0000.5248)的伦理批准。结果各组间β -多样性无显著差异。加权UniFrac分析显示,GCK-MODY个体与HNF1A-MODY个体的GM群落结构存在差异(PERMANOVA, R2 = 0.078, P = 0.014),但经多重检验校正后,差异无统计学意义(调整后P = 0.072)。差异丰度分析没有发现任何在错误发现率校正后仍然显著的属。然而,Enterorhabdus、Anaerotruncus和Collinsella在各种分析方法中一致显示出更高的HNF1A-MODY丰度。用MaAsLin2鉴定的非培养属的相关性最强(P = 0.0004,经fdr校正P = 0.071)。这些分类群涉及代谢和炎症过程,包括葡萄糖和脂质代谢。各组间β -多样性无显著差异。加权UniFrac分析显示,GCK-MODY个体与HNF1A-MODY个体的GM群落结构存在差异(PERMANOVA, R2 = 0.078, P = 0.014),但经多重检验校正后,差异无统计学意义(调整后P = 0.072)。差异丰度分析没有发现任何在错误发现率校正后仍然显著的属。然而,Enterorhabdus、Anaerotruncus和Collinsella在各种分析方法中一致显示出更高的HNF1A-MODY丰度。用MaAsLin2鉴定的非培养属的相关性最强(P = 0.0004,经fdr校正P = 0.071)。这些分类群涉及代谢和炎症过程,包括葡萄糖和脂质代谢。结论经过多次检验校正后,虽然没有属间存在显著差异,但加权UniFrac分析和多种分析方法间一致的丰度模式提示GCK-MODY和HNF1A-MODY个体间转基因成分存在潜在差异。这些初步发现支持进一步的研究,以更好地表征与不同MODY亚型相关的GM谱。尽管经过多次检验校正后,没有属存在显著差异,但加权UniFrac分析和多种分析方法一致的丰度模式表明,GCK-MODY和HNF1A-MODY个体之间的转基因成分存在潜在差异。这些初步发现支持进一步的研究,以更好地表征与不同MODY亚型相关的GM谱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE
CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
55
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Les Cahiers de nutrition et de diététique sont le lieu de communication reconnu pour les médecins spécialistes de la nutrition, les diététiciens, les professionnels et les chercheurs de agro-alimentaire, les enseignants et les étudiants. Les Cahiers de nutrition et de diététique abordent les sujets se rapportant à la biologie générale, à la médecine et à la nutrition, aux aliments, aux comportements alimentaires, à la diététique pratique, ainsi que des thèmes variés : activité physique, apports nutritionnels conseillés, dénutrition, alcool, obésité de enfant, aliments à effet santé, plaisir alimentaire, restauration collective, goûters et collations, allergies alimentaires...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书