SIRT1 -1400T>C Polymorphism (rs12778366) and metabolic-inflammatory variability in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: Perspectives for personalized nutrition

IF 0.3 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.cnd.2026.08.077
Amanda Alves Ribeiro, Beatriz Garcia de Carvalho, Jhulia Caroline Nunes Leal da Mota, Lucas Moura Carvalho, José Alfredo Martinez, Eduardo Ferreira Borba, Carolina Nicoletti Ferreira Fino
{"title":"SIRT1 -1400T>C Polymorphism (rs12778366) and metabolic-inflammatory variability in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: Perspectives for personalized nutrition","authors":"Amanda Alves Ribeiro,&nbsp;Beatriz Garcia de Carvalho,&nbsp;Jhulia Caroline Nunes Leal da Mota,&nbsp;Lucas Moura Carvalho,&nbsp;José Alfredo Martinez,&nbsp;Eduardo Ferreira Borba,&nbsp;Carolina Nicoletti Ferreira Fino","doi":"10.1016/j.cnd.2026.08.077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the association between the SIRT1 -1400T&gt;C polymorphism (rs12778366) and body composition parameters as well as inflammatory biomarkers in women with SLE.</div></div><div>This study aimed to investigate the association between the SIRT1 -1400T&gt;C polymorphism (rs12778366) and body composition parameters as well as inflammatory biomarkers in women with SLE.</div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This exploratory study included 121 women diagnosed with SLE and followed at the Adult Lupus Outpatient Clinic of the Rheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo. Participants were stratified according to the TT, CT, and CC genotypes of the -1400T&gt;C polymorphism. The evaluated parameters included body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), absolute lean mass (LM), percentage of lean mass, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and disease activity assessed by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Parametric variables were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, whereas nonparametric variables were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Statistical significance was set at <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05. All study procedures were conducted following approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), under CAAE No. 86418824.6.0000.0068.</div></div><div>This exploratory study included 121 women diagnosed with SLE and followed at the Adult Lupus Outpatient Clinic of the Rheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo. Participants were stratified according to the TT, CT, and CC genotypes of the -1400T&gt;C polymorphism. The evaluated parameters included body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), absolute lean mass (LM), percentage of lean mass, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and disease activity assessed by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Parametric variables were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, whereas nonparametric variables were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Statistical significance was set at <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05. All study procedures were conducted following approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), under CAAE No. 86418824.6.0000.0068.</div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No statistically significant differences were observed among genotypes for BMI (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.802), WC (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.252), LM (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.094), percentage of lean mass (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.629), CRP (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.070), ESR (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.088), or SLEDAI (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.450). The TT genotype was the most prevalent (81.8%), followed by CT (9.9%) and CC (8.3%). Allelic frequencies were 86.8% for the T allele and 13.2% for the C allele.</div></div><div>No statistically significant differences were observed among genotypes for BMI (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.802), WC (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.252), LM (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.094), percentage of lean mass (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.629), CRP (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.070), ESR (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.088), or SLEDAI (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.450). The TT genotype was the most prevalent (81.8%), followed by CT (9.9%) and CC (8.3%). Allelic frequencies were 86.8% for the T allele and 13.2% for the C allele.</div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The SIRT1 -1400T&gt;C polymorphism (rs12778366) was not significantly associated with metabolic parameters, inflammatory biomarkers, or disease activity in women with SLE. Nevertheless, given the regulatory role of SIRT1 in metabolic and inflammatory pathways, rs12778366 remains a biologically relevant candidate variant for investigating the clinical and metabolic heterogeneity of SLE. The predominance of the TT genotype and the low frequency of variant genotypes (CT and CC) may have limited the statistical power of the analyses, highlighting the need for larger studies to better elucidate the functional impact of this polymorphism in SLE.</div></div><div>The SIRT1 -1400T&gt;C polymorphism (rs12778366) was not significantly associated with metabolic parameters, inflammatory biomarkers, or disease activity in women with SLE. Nevertheless, given the regulatory role of SIRT1 in metabolic and inflammatory pathways, rs12778366 remains a biologically relevant candidate variant for investigating the clinical and metabolic heterogeneity of SLE. The predominance of the TT genotype and the low frequency of variant genotypes (CT and CC) may have limited the statistical power of the analyses, highlighting the need for larger studies to better elucidate the functional impact of this polymorphism in SLE.</div>","PeriodicalId":43722,"journal":{"name":"CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE","volume":"61 ","pages":"Page e42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007996026001537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the association between the SIRT1 -1400T>C polymorphism (rs12778366) and body composition parameters as well as inflammatory biomarkers in women with SLE.
This study aimed to investigate the association between the SIRT1 -1400T>C polymorphism (rs12778366) and body composition parameters as well as inflammatory biomarkers in women with SLE.

Methods

This exploratory study included 121 women diagnosed with SLE and followed at the Adult Lupus Outpatient Clinic of the Rheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo. Participants were stratified according to the TT, CT, and CC genotypes of the -1400T>C polymorphism. The evaluated parameters included body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), absolute lean mass (LM), percentage of lean mass, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and disease activity assessed by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Parametric variables were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, whereas nonparametric variables were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. All study procedures were conducted following approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), under CAAE No. 86418824.6.0000.0068.
This exploratory study included 121 women diagnosed with SLE and followed at the Adult Lupus Outpatient Clinic of the Rheumatology Division, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo. Participants were stratified according to the TT, CT, and CC genotypes of the -1400T>C polymorphism. The evaluated parameters included body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), absolute lean mass (LM), percentage of lean mass, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and disease activity assessed by the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Parametric variables were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, whereas nonparametric variables were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. All study procedures were conducted following approval by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), under CAAE No. 86418824.6.0000.0068.

Results

No statistically significant differences were observed among genotypes for BMI (P = 0.802), WC (P = 0.252), LM (P = 0.094), percentage of lean mass (P = 0.629), CRP (P = 0.070), ESR (P = 0.088), or SLEDAI (P = 0.450). The TT genotype was the most prevalent (81.8%), followed by CT (9.9%) and CC (8.3%). Allelic frequencies were 86.8% for the T allele and 13.2% for the C allele.
No statistically significant differences were observed among genotypes for BMI (P = 0.802), WC (P = 0.252), LM (P = 0.094), percentage of lean mass (P = 0.629), CRP (P = 0.070), ESR (P = 0.088), or SLEDAI (P = 0.450). The TT genotype was the most prevalent (81.8%), followed by CT (9.9%) and CC (8.3%). Allelic frequencies were 86.8% for the T allele and 13.2% for the C allele.

Conclusion

The SIRT1 -1400T>C polymorphism (rs12778366) was not significantly associated with metabolic parameters, inflammatory biomarkers, or disease activity in women with SLE. Nevertheless, given the regulatory role of SIRT1 in metabolic and inflammatory pathways, rs12778366 remains a biologically relevant candidate variant for investigating the clinical and metabolic heterogeneity of SLE. The predominance of the TT genotype and the low frequency of variant genotypes (CT and CC) may have limited the statistical power of the analyses, highlighting the need for larger studies to better elucidate the functional impact of this polymorphism in SLE.
The SIRT1 -1400T>C polymorphism (rs12778366) was not significantly associated with metabolic parameters, inflammatory biomarkers, or disease activity in women with SLE. Nevertheless, given the regulatory role of SIRT1 in metabolic and inflammatory pathways, rs12778366 remains a biologically relevant candidate variant for investigating the clinical and metabolic heterogeneity of SLE. The predominance of the TT genotype and the low frequency of variant genotypes (CT and CC) may have limited the statistical power of the analyses, highlighting the need for larger studies to better elucidate the functional impact of this polymorphism in SLE.
SIRT1 -1400T>C多态性(rs12778366)和系统性红斑狼疮女性的代谢-炎症变异性:个性化营养的观点
目的本研究旨在探讨女性SLE患者SIRT1 -1400T>;C多态性(rs12778366)与机体组成参数及炎症生物标志物的关系。本研究旨在探讨女性SLE患者SIRT1 -1400T>;C多态性(rs12778366)与机体组成参数及炎症生物标志物之间的关系。方法本探索性研究纳入121名诊断为SLE的女性,随访于圣保罗大学医学院das医院Clínicas风湿病科成人狼疮门诊。根据-1400T>;C多态性的TT、CT和CC基因型对参与者进行分层。评估参数包括体重指数(BMI)、腰围(WC)、绝对瘦质量(LM)、瘦质量百分比、c反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)评估的疾病活动性。使用Shapiro-Wilk检验评估数据的正态性。参数变量采用单因素方差分析,非参数变量采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行比较。P <; 0.05为统计学意义。所有研究程序均经巴西圣保罗大学医学院das医院研究伦理委员会(HC-FMUSP)批准,CAAE号为86418824.6.00000 .0068。这项探索性研究包括121名被诊断为SLE的女性,并在圣保罗大学医学院das医院Clínicas风湿病科成人狼疮门诊进行随访。根据-1400T>;C多态性的TT、CT和CC基因型对参与者进行分层。评估参数包括体重指数(BMI)、腰围(WC)、绝对瘦质量(LM)、瘦质量百分比、c反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数(SLEDAI)评估的疾病活动性。使用Shapiro-Wilk检验评估数据的正态性。参数变量采用单因素方差分析,非参数变量采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行比较。P <; 0.05为统计学意义。所有研究程序均经巴西圣保罗大学医学院das医院研究伦理委员会(HC-FMUSP)批准,CAAE号为86418824.6.00000 .0068。结果BMI (P = 0.802)、WC (P = 0.252)、LM (P = 0.094)、瘦体重率(P = 0.629)、CRP (P = 0.070)、ESR (P = 0.088)、SLEDAI (P = 0.450)基因型间差异均无统计学意义。TT基因型最多(81.8%),其次是CT(9.9%)和CC(8.3%)。T等位基因频率为86.8%,C等位基因频率为13.2%。基因型间BMI (P = 0.802)、WC (P = 0.252)、LM (P = 0.094)、瘦体重百分比(P = 0.629)、CRP (P = 0.070)、ESR (P = 0.088)、SLEDAI (P = 0.450)的差异均无统计学意义。TT基因型最多(81.8%),其次是CT(9.9%)和CC(8.3%)。T等位基因频率为86.8%,C等位基因频率为13.2%。结论SIRT1 -1400T>;C多态性(rs12778366)与SLE女性的代谢参数、炎症生物标志物或疾病活动性无显著相关性。然而,鉴于SIRT1在代谢和炎症途径中的调节作用,rs12778366仍然是研究SLE临床和代谢异质性的生物学相关候选变异。TT基因型的优势和变异基因型(CT和CC)的低频率可能限制了分析的统计效力,强调需要更大规模的研究来更好地阐明这种多态性在SLE中的功能影响。SIRT1 -1400T>;C多态性(rs12778366)与SLE女性的代谢参数、炎症生物标志物或疾病活动性无显著相关性。然而,鉴于SIRT1在代谢和炎症途径中的调节作用,rs12778366仍然是研究SLE临床和代谢异质性的生物学相关候选变异。TT基因型的优势和变异基因型(CT和CC)的低频率可能限制了分析的统计效力,强调需要更大规模的研究来更好地阐明这种多态性在SLE中的功能影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE
CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
55
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Les Cahiers de nutrition et de diététique sont le lieu de communication reconnu pour les médecins spécialistes de la nutrition, les diététiciens, les professionnels et les chercheurs de agro-alimentaire, les enseignants et les étudiants. Les Cahiers de nutrition et de diététique abordent les sujets se rapportant à la biologie générale, à la médecine et à la nutrition, aux aliments, aux comportements alimentaires, à la diététique pratique, ainsi que des thèmes variés : activité physique, apports nutritionnels conseillés, dénutrition, alcool, obésité de enfant, aliments à effet santé, plaisir alimentaire, restauration collective, goûters et collations, allergies alimentaires...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书