Bioactive potential of soursop (Annona muricata L.) by-products: Antioxidant properties and effects on toxicity and oxidative stress in Caenorhabditis elegans
Valéria Silva de Lana, Marcella Duarte Villas Mishima, Douglas Correia de Souza, Hércia Stampini Duarte Martino
{"title":"Bioactive potential of soursop (Annona muricata L.) by-products: Antioxidant properties and effects on toxicity and oxidative stress in Caenorhabditis elegans","authors":"Valéria Silva de Lana, Marcella Duarte Villas Mishima, Douglas Correia de Souza, Hércia Stampini Duarte Martino","doi":"10.1016/j.cnd.2026.08.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the bioactive potential of soursop (<em>Annona muricata</em> L.) by-products (peel, pomace and seeds) and their effects on toxicity and oxidative stress in <em>Caenorhabditis elegans</em>.</div></div><div>To evaluate the bioactive potential of soursop (<em>Annona muricata</em> L.) by-products (peel, pomace and seeds) and their effects on toxicity and oxidative stress in <em>Caenorhabditis elegans</em>.</div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The three fractions were freeze-dried, ground, and extracted with 50% ethanol. Total phenolics, flavonoids, condensed tannins, and antioxidant capacity (DPPH, ABTS) were measured. <em>C. elegans</em> N2 (L4 stage) were exposed to 5%, 0.5%, and 0.1% (w/v) by-products for toxicity; survival was assessed by movement. For oxidative stress, nematodes were co-exposed to 0.5% extracts and 4–12<!--> <!-->mM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> for 24<!--> <!-->h. Antioxidant properties were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's. <em>C. elegans</em> assays were analyzed using Student's t-test against the control group.</div></div><div>The three fractions were freeze-dried, ground, and extracted with 50% ethanol. Total phenolics, flavonoids, condensed tannins, and antioxidant capacity (DPPH, ABTS) were measured. <em>C. elegans</em> N2 (L4 stage) were exposed to 5%, 0.5%, and 0.1% (w/v) by-products for toxicity; survival was assessed by movement. For oxidative stress, nematodes were co-exposed to 0.5% extracts and 4–12<!--> <!-->mM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> for 24<!--> <!-->h. Antioxidant properties were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's. <em>C. elegans</em> assays were analyzed using Student's t-test against the control group.</div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Peel exhibited the highest antioxidant capacity (μmol TE/g), reaching 10,615.08<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->363.50 (DPPH) and 163.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.8 (ABTS), followed by the pomace (2078.21<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->35.76 and 62.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.6), seed exhibited the lowest activity (183.43<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.43 and 1.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.0). Peel presented the highest levels of total phenolic compounds (2658.16<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->120.65 mgGAE/100<!--> <!-->g), flavonoids (252.65<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8.7 mgEC/100<!--> <!-->g) and tannins (100.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.9 mgEC/g), followed by pomace (908.53<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->36.04 mgGAE/100<!--> <!-->g, 172.78<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->25 mgEC/100<!--> <!-->g and 64.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.8 mgEC/g, respectively). Seeds had the lowest values (173.13<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.58 mgGAE/100<!--> <!-->g, 21.23<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.4 mgEC/100<!--> <!-->g and 1.07<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.6 mgEC/g). In <em>C. elegans</em>, peel and pomace showed no toxicity at 5%, 0.5%, and 0.1%. The seed reduced survival at 5%, but not at 0.5% or 0.1%. Under oxidative stress, the seed enhanced <em>C. elegans</em> survival at 4, 8, and 12<!--> <!-->mM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, indicating a protective effect. The peel improved survival only at 4<!--> <!-->mM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, whereas the pomace extract showed no effect at any concentration tested.</div></div><div>Peel exhibited the highest antioxidant capacity (μmol TE/g), reaching 10,615.08<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->363.50 (DPPH) and 163.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.8 (ABTS), followed by the pomace (2078.21<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->35.76 and 62.1<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.6), seed exhibited the lowest activity (183.43<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.43 and 1.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.0). Peel presented the highest levels of total phenolic compounds (2658.16<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->120.65 mgGAE/100<!--> <!-->g), flavonoids (252.65<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->8.7 mgEC/100<!--> <!-->g) and tannins (100.7<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->4.9 mgEC/g), followed by pomace (908.53<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->36.04 mgGAE/100<!--> <!-->g, 172.78<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->25 mgEC/100<!--> <!-->g and 64.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.8 mgEC/g, respectively). Seeds had the lowest values (173.13<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.58 mgGAE/100<!--> <!-->g, 21.23<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.4 mgEC/100<!--> <!-->g and 1.07<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.6 mgEC/g). In <em>C. elegans</em>, peel and pomace showed no toxicity at 5%, 0.5%, and 0.1%. The seed reduced survival at 5%, but not at 0.5% or 0.1%. Under oxidative stress, the seed enhanced <em>C. elegans</em> survival at 4, 8, and 12<!--> <!-->mM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, indicating a protective effect. The peel improved survival only at 4<!--> <!-->mM H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, whereas the pomace extract showed no effect at any concentration tested.</div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Soursop by-products are valuable sources of bioactive compounds, highlighting its potential as sustainable sources of functional ingredients.</div></div><div>Soursop by-products are valuable sources of bioactive compounds, highlighting its potential as sustainable sources of functional ingredients.</div>","PeriodicalId":43722,"journal":{"name":"CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE","volume":"61 ","pages":"Pages e22-e23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAHIERS DE NUTRITION ET DE DIETETIQUE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007996026001161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the bioactive potential of soursop (Annona muricata L.) by-products (peel, pomace and seeds) and their effects on toxicity and oxidative stress in Caenorhabditis elegans.
To evaluate the bioactive potential of soursop (Annona muricata L.) by-products (peel, pomace and seeds) and their effects on toxicity and oxidative stress in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Methods
The three fractions were freeze-dried, ground, and extracted with 50% ethanol. Total phenolics, flavonoids, condensed tannins, and antioxidant capacity (DPPH, ABTS) were measured. C. elegans N2 (L4 stage) were exposed to 5%, 0.5%, and 0.1% (w/v) by-products for toxicity; survival was assessed by movement. For oxidative stress, nematodes were co-exposed to 0.5% extracts and 4–12 mM H2O2 for 24 h. Antioxidant properties were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's. C. elegans assays were analyzed using Student's t-test against the control group.
The three fractions were freeze-dried, ground, and extracted with 50% ethanol. Total phenolics, flavonoids, condensed tannins, and antioxidant capacity (DPPH, ABTS) were measured. C. elegans N2 (L4 stage) were exposed to 5%, 0.5%, and 0.1% (w/v) by-products for toxicity; survival was assessed by movement. For oxidative stress, nematodes were co-exposed to 0.5% extracts and 4–12 mM H2O2 for 24 h. Antioxidant properties were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's. C. elegans assays were analyzed using Student's t-test against the control group.
Results
Peel exhibited the highest antioxidant capacity (μmol TE/g), reaching 10,615.08 ± 363.50 (DPPH) and 163.3 ± 4.8 (ABTS), followed by the pomace (2078.21 ± 35.76 and 62.1 ± 1.6), seed exhibited the lowest activity (183.43 ± 1.43 and 1.2 ± 0.0). Peel presented the highest levels of total phenolic compounds (2658.16 ± 120.65 mgGAE/100 g), flavonoids (252.65 ± 8.7 mgEC/100 g) and tannins (100.7 ± 4.9 mgEC/g), followed by pomace (908.53 ± 36.04 mgGAE/100 g, 172.78 ± 25 mgEC/100 g and 64.2 ± 2.8 mgEC/g, respectively). Seeds had the lowest values (173.13 ± 3.58 mgGAE/100 g, 21.23 ± 0.4 mgEC/100 g and 1.07 ± 0.6 mgEC/g). In C. elegans, peel and pomace showed no toxicity at 5%, 0.5%, and 0.1%. The seed reduced survival at 5%, but not at 0.5% or 0.1%. Under oxidative stress, the seed enhanced C. elegans survival at 4, 8, and 12 mM H2O2, indicating a protective effect. The peel improved survival only at 4 mM H2O2, whereas the pomace extract showed no effect at any concentration tested.
Peel exhibited the highest antioxidant capacity (μmol TE/g), reaching 10,615.08 ± 363.50 (DPPH) and 163.3 ± 4.8 (ABTS), followed by the pomace (2078.21 ± 35.76 and 62.1 ± 1.6), seed exhibited the lowest activity (183.43 ± 1.43 and 1.2 ± 0.0). Peel presented the highest levels of total phenolic compounds (2658.16 ± 120.65 mgGAE/100 g), flavonoids (252.65 ± 8.7 mgEC/100 g) and tannins (100.7 ± 4.9 mgEC/g), followed by pomace (908.53 ± 36.04 mgGAE/100 g, 172.78 ± 25 mgEC/100 g and 64.2 ± 2.8 mgEC/g, respectively). Seeds had the lowest values (173.13 ± 3.58 mgGAE/100 g, 21.23 ± 0.4 mgEC/100 g and 1.07 ± 0.6 mgEC/g). In C. elegans, peel and pomace showed no toxicity at 5%, 0.5%, and 0.1%. The seed reduced survival at 5%, but not at 0.5% or 0.1%. Under oxidative stress, the seed enhanced C. elegans survival at 4, 8, and 12 mM H2O2, indicating a protective effect. The peel improved survival only at 4 mM H2O2, whereas the pomace extract showed no effect at any concentration tested.
Conclusion
Soursop by-products are valuable sources of bioactive compounds, highlighting its potential as sustainable sources of functional ingredients.
Soursop by-products are valuable sources of bioactive compounds, highlighting its potential as sustainable sources of functional ingredients.
期刊介绍:
Les Cahiers de nutrition et de diététique sont le lieu de communication reconnu pour les médecins spécialistes de la nutrition, les diététiciens, les professionnels et les chercheurs de agro-alimentaire, les enseignants et les étudiants. Les Cahiers de nutrition et de diététique abordent les sujets se rapportant à la biologie générale, à la médecine et à la nutrition, aux aliments, aux comportements alimentaires, à la diététique pratique, ainsi que des thèmes variés : activité physique, apports nutritionnels conseillés, dénutrition, alcool, obésité de enfant, aliments à effet santé, plaisir alimentaire, restauration collective, goûters et collations, allergies alimentaires...