Federated learning for privacy-preserving opportunistic screening of lumbar-spine DXA-defined osteoporotic-level bone mineral density using chest radiographs: A multi-center independent validation study

IF 2.4 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.afos.2026.06.001
Bo-Ru Lin, Ming-Yueh Huang, Wei-Chung Sun, Po-Wei Wu, Paul Chang, Ethan Tu, Wei-Chieh Hung
{"title":"Federated learning for privacy-preserving opportunistic screening of lumbar-spine DXA-defined osteoporotic-level bone mineral density using chest radiographs: A multi-center independent validation study","authors":"Bo-Ru Lin,&nbsp;Ming-Yueh Huang,&nbsp;Wei-Chung Sun,&nbsp;Po-Wei Wu,&nbsp;Paul Chang,&nbsp;Ethan Tu,&nbsp;Wei-Chieh Hung","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2026.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) system trained via federated learning for opportunistic screening of lumbar-spine DXA-defined osteoporotic-level bone mineral density (T-score ≤ −2.5) using routine chest X-rays (CXRs) in a multi-center independent validation setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A deep learning model was developed via privacy-preserving federated learning on 5943 paired CXR and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examinations and validated on an independent dual-center cohort of 3007 adults undergoing same-day CXR and DXA. Ground truth was a lumbar spine DXA T-score ≤ −2.5. The primary metric was AUROC, alongside sensitivity and specificity. Image-only and clinical-only ablation models were evaluated on the same cohort to disentangle imaging from demographic contributions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 3007 validation cases, 200 (6.7%) had a T-score ≤ −2.5. The AI achieved an AUROC of 0.942 (95% CI, 0.923–0.962), with sensitivity of 91.0% and specificity of 82.7%, and performance was preserved across study sites, sexes, and the clinically relevant older stratum (≥60 years). In ablation analysis, the image-only model achieved AUROC 0.931 (95% CI 0.912–0.950) and the clinical-only baseline 0.780 (0.732–0.827); non-overlapping 95% CIs (image-only higher) support an independent imaging contribution beyond demographics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This federated learning-based AI demonstrates high discrimination for identifying lumbar-spine DXA-defined osteoporotic-level bone mineral density (T-score ≤ −2.5) from standard CXRs and shows temporal transportability across two institutions without centralizing raw imaging data. Positioned as a triage adjunct to confirmatory DXA, it offers a scalable, privacy-preserving opportunistic screening solution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 23-31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525526000440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) system trained via federated learning for opportunistic screening of lumbar-spine DXA-defined osteoporotic-level bone mineral density (T-score ≤ −2.5) using routine chest X-rays (CXRs) in a multi-center independent validation setting.

Methods

A deep learning model was developed via privacy-preserving federated learning on 5943 paired CXR and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) examinations and validated on an independent dual-center cohort of 3007 adults undergoing same-day CXR and DXA. Ground truth was a lumbar spine DXA T-score ≤ −2.5. The primary metric was AUROC, alongside sensitivity and specificity. Image-only and clinical-only ablation models were evaluated on the same cohort to disentangle imaging from demographic contributions.

Results

Among 3007 validation cases, 200 (6.7%) had a T-score ≤ −2.5. The AI achieved an AUROC of 0.942 (95% CI, 0.923–0.962), with sensitivity of 91.0% and specificity of 82.7%, and performance was preserved across study sites, sexes, and the clinically relevant older stratum (≥60 years). In ablation analysis, the image-only model achieved AUROC 0.931 (95% CI 0.912–0.950) and the clinical-only baseline 0.780 (0.732–0.827); non-overlapping 95% CIs (image-only higher) support an independent imaging contribution beyond demographics.

Conclusions

This federated learning-based AI demonstrates high discrimination for identifying lumbar-spine DXA-defined osteoporotic-level bone mineral density (T-score ≤ −2.5) from standard CXRs and shows temporal transportability across two institutions without centralizing raw imaging data. Positioned as a triage adjunct to confirmatory DXA, it offers a scalable, privacy-preserving opportunistic screening solution.
联邦学习用于保护隐私的机会性筛查腰椎dxa定义的骨质疏松水平骨密度胸片:一项多中心独立验证研究
目的:在多中心独立验证环境下,评估通过联合学习训练的人工智能(AI)系统在常规胸部x线(cxr)检查腰椎dxa定义的骨质疏松水平骨密度(t评分≤- 2.5)的机会性筛查中的性能。方法通过对5943例配对CXR和双能x线吸收仪(DXA)检查进行隐私保护联合学习,建立深度学习模型,并在3007名同一天进行CXR和DXA的独立双中心队列中进行验证。基本事实是腰椎DXA t评分≤- 2.5。主要指标为AUROC,以及敏感性和特异性。在同一队列中评估仅图像和仅临床消融模型,以区分影像学与人口统计学的影响。结果3007例验证病例中,t评分≤- 2.5的有200例(6.7%)。人工智能的AUROC为0.942 (95% CI, 0.923-0.962),灵敏度为91.0%,特异性为82.7%,并且在研究地点、性别和临床相关的老年层(≥60岁)中都能保持良好的表现。在消融分析中,仅图像模型AUROC为0.931 (95% CI 0.912-0.950),仅临床基线AUROC为0.780 (0.732-0.827);不重叠的95% ci(仅图像较高)支持独立的影像学贡献,超越人口统计学。结论:这种基于学习的联合人工智能在从标准cxr中识别dxa定义的腰椎骨质疏松水平骨密度(t评分≤- 2.5)方面表现出高度的辨别能力,并且在没有集中原始成像数据的情况下显示出跨两个机构的时间可移植性。作为确认性DXA的辅助诊断,它提供了一种可扩展的、保护隐私的机会性筛查解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology
自引率
5.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书