Bevily Nukeri, Velibanti Sukati, Pheagane Motsime William Nkoana
{"title":"The Prevalence of Spectacle Non-Adaptation Among Patients Presenting at a Private Practice in Witbank, South Africa.","authors":"Bevily Nukeri, Velibanti Sukati, Pheagane Motsime William Nkoana","doi":"10.1007/s44402-026-00186-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the prevalence of and factors associated with spectacle non-adaptation in a private optometry practice in Witbank, South Africa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective descriptive study was conducted using clinical and dispensing records of patients prescribed spectacles between January 1 and December 31, 2024. Purposeful sampling identified patients who returned with complaints of non-adaptation to spectacles. Extracted data included demographic characteristics, spectacle type and factors associated with non-adaptation. Causes were categorised as being related to the prescription, dispensing, communication, binocular vision or pathology. Descriptive statistics summarised the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 3146 spectacles were prescribed. Of those, 155 patients returned with complaints of spectacle non-adaptation. This yielded a prevalence of 4.9%. The mean age of the affected patients was 42.22 ± 17.13 years. Females accounted for 58% of cases. Non-adaptation was most frequently associated with multifocal spectacles (54%). Prescription and dispensing-related factors caused 44% and 28% of cases, respectively. Binocular vision and pathology-related factors accounted for smaller proportions of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Spectacle non-adaptation, being observed in a small but clinically relevant proportion of patients, warrants serious attention in private practice settings. The predominance of prescription- and dispensing-related causes underscores the pressing need for rigorous accuracy and quality control throughout the optometric care process. Strengthening these areas is essential for reducing non-adaptation and ensuring continued use of spectacles.</p>","PeriodicalId":520731,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44402-026-00186-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the prevalence of and factors associated with spectacle non-adaptation in a private optometry practice in Witbank, South Africa.
Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted using clinical and dispensing records of patients prescribed spectacles between January 1 and December 31, 2024. Purposeful sampling identified patients who returned with complaints of non-adaptation to spectacles. Extracted data included demographic characteristics, spectacle type and factors associated with non-adaptation. Causes were categorised as being related to the prescription, dispensing, communication, binocular vision or pathology. Descriptive statistics summarised the data.
Results: During the study period, 3146 spectacles were prescribed. Of those, 155 patients returned with complaints of spectacle non-adaptation. This yielded a prevalence of 4.9%. The mean age of the affected patients was 42.22 ± 17.13 years. Females accounted for 58% of cases. Non-adaptation was most frequently associated with multifocal spectacles (54%). Prescription and dispensing-related factors caused 44% and 28% of cases, respectively. Binocular vision and pathology-related factors accounted for smaller proportions of cases.
Conclusion: Spectacle non-adaptation, being observed in a small but clinically relevant proportion of patients, warrants serious attention in private practice settings. The predominance of prescription- and dispensing-related causes underscores the pressing need for rigorous accuracy and quality control throughout the optometric care process. Strengthening these areas is essential for reducing non-adaptation and ensuring continued use of spectacles.