Physiological impact of coronary artery bypass surgery on chronic total occlusion: a functional evaluation using coronary flow reserve.

IF 1.4 0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kentaro Honda, Hideki Kunimoto, Ryo Nakamura, Takahiro Fujimoto, Yu Kajimoto, Mizuho Ikuchi, Kota Agematsu, Yoshiharu Nishimura
{"title":"Physiological impact of coronary artery bypass surgery on chronic total occlusion: a functional evaluation using coronary flow reserve.","authors":"Kentaro Honda, Hideki Kunimoto, Ryo Nakamura, Takahiro Fujimoto, Yu Kajimoto, Mizuho Ikuchi, Kota Agematsu, Yoshiharu Nishimura","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivag273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study evaluated the physiological impact of CABG for left anterior descending (LAD) artery chronic total occlusion (CTO) using postoperative coronary flow reserve (CFR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 1,149 patients undergoing isolated CABG, comparing LAD-CTO (n = 164) and non-CTO (n = 985) groups. Postoperative CFR was measured in 685 patients. The CTO group was stratified by preoperative Rentrop collateral classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the entire cohort (n = 1,149), early mortality (3.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.1018) and LAD graft patency (97.8% vs. 98.6%, p = 0.4595) were comparable between groups. In the CFR cohort (n = 685), the CTO group showed lower CFR values than the non-CTO group (2.76 ± 0.90 vs. 3.04 ± 0.88, p = 0.0012). However, mean CFR exceeded 2.0 across all CTO subgroups, regardless of collateral status (Poor: 2.66 ± 0.7; Moderate: 2.76 ±0.94; Good: 2.78 ± 1.00; p = 0.763).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CABG achieves reliable physiological improvement (CFR > 2.0) and favorable outcomes for LAD-CTO revascularization, independent of preoperative Rentrop collateral grade.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivag273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study evaluated the physiological impact of CABG for left anterior descending (LAD) artery chronic total occlusion (CTO) using postoperative coronary flow reserve (CFR).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,149 patients undergoing isolated CABG, comparing LAD-CTO (n = 164) and non-CTO (n = 985) groups. Postoperative CFR was measured in 685 patients. The CTO group was stratified by preoperative Rentrop collateral classification.

Results: In the entire cohort (n = 1,149), early mortality (3.7% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.1018) and LAD graft patency (97.8% vs. 98.6%, p = 0.4595) were comparable between groups. In the CFR cohort (n = 685), the CTO group showed lower CFR values than the non-CTO group (2.76 ± 0.90 vs. 3.04 ± 0.88, p = 0.0012). However, mean CFR exceeded 2.0 across all CTO subgroups, regardless of collateral status (Poor: 2.66 ± 0.7; Moderate: 2.76 ±0.94; Good: 2.78 ± 1.00; p = 0.763).

Conclusions: CABG achieves reliable physiological improvement (CFR > 2.0) and favorable outcomes for LAD-CTO revascularization, independent of preoperative Rentrop collateral grade.

冠状动脉旁路手术对慢性全闭塞的生理影响:冠状动脉血流储备的功能评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书