History of instruments and technology in the clinical neurosciences: 2. Selected historical sources.

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Douglas J Lanska
{"title":"History of instruments and technology in the clinical neurosciences: 2. Selected historical sources.","authors":"Douglas J Lanska","doi":"10.1080/0964704X.2026.2726435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sources of information on the history of instruments and technology in the clinical neurosciences, particularly before 1900, are unfortunately arcane and fragmented. Therefore, a description of some of the resources available is provided to assist historians who wish to pursue studies of neurologic or neurosurgical instruments or technologies. Historical primary sources concerning medical instrumentation and technology are much richer than those provided through the standard sources used in medical historiography and include advertisements, patents, testimonials of physicians, museum collections, and <i>ephemera</i> such as trade catalogs. Trade catalogs were an important source of information on medical instruments for practitioners and remain an important source of information on these instruments for historians; however, because these were intended to be <i>ephemera</i>, their preservation has been haphazard and largely accidental. Unlike the restrictions on advertising for nineteenth-century physicians, medical trade catalogs were under no ethical constraints about advertising. Consequently, trade catalogs often listed the names of physician inventors for different instruments, occasionally reprinted original citations concerning the instruments or even portions of the original publications that described the instruments (i.e. either a medical journal article or a medical textbook), and occasionally printed testimonials from physicians who had invented or perfected medical instruments.</p>","PeriodicalId":49997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of the Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0964704X.2026.2726435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sources of information on the history of instruments and technology in the clinical neurosciences, particularly before 1900, are unfortunately arcane and fragmented. Therefore, a description of some of the resources available is provided to assist historians who wish to pursue studies of neurologic or neurosurgical instruments or technologies. Historical primary sources concerning medical instrumentation and technology are much richer than those provided through the standard sources used in medical historiography and include advertisements, patents, testimonials of physicians, museum collections, and ephemera such as trade catalogs. Trade catalogs were an important source of information on medical instruments for practitioners and remain an important source of information on these instruments for historians; however, because these were intended to be ephemera, their preservation has been haphazard and largely accidental. Unlike the restrictions on advertising for nineteenth-century physicians, medical trade catalogs were under no ethical constraints about advertising. Consequently, trade catalogs often listed the names of physician inventors for different instruments, occasionally reprinted original citations concerning the instruments or even portions of the original publications that described the instruments (i.e. either a medical journal article or a medical textbook), and occasionally printed testimonials from physicians who had invented or perfected medical instruments.

临床神经科学仪器与技术的历史:选定的历史资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the History of the Neurosciences
Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the History of the Neurosciences is the leading communication platform dealing with the historical roots of the basic and applied neurosciences. Its domains cover historical perspectives and developments, including biographical studies, disorders, institutions, documents, and instrumentation in neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropsychology, and the behavioral neurosciences. The history of ideas, changes in society and medicine, and the connections with other disciplines (e.g., the arts, philosophy, psychology) are welcome. In addition to original, full-length papers, the journal welcomes informative short communications, letters to the editors, book reviews, and contributions to its NeuroWords and Neurognostics columns. All manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by an Editor, and, if found suitable for further consideration, full- and short-length papers are subject to peer review (double blind, if requested) by at least 2 anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书