Immunohistochemical expression of p53 is a helpful surrogate marker in the differential diagnosis of primary ovarian mucinous tumors: a large study of 181 cases of mucinous borderline tumor and carcinoma.
Pavel Dundr, Isabela Töltési, Michaela Kendall Bártů, Jana Drozenová, Pavel Fabian, Oluwole Fadare, Jitka Hausnerová, Jan Laco, Sigurd F Lax, Radoslav Matěj, Ivana Stružinská, Zuzana Špůrková, Barbora Weberová, Simona Stolnicu, Marián Švajdler, W Glenn McCluggage, Romana Vránková, Kristýna Němejcová
{"title":"Immunohistochemical expression of p53 is a helpful surrogate marker in the differential diagnosis of primary ovarian mucinous tumors: a large study of 181 cases of mucinous borderline tumor and carcinoma.","authors":"Pavel Dundr, Isabela Töltési, Michaela Kendall Bártů, Jana Drozenová, Pavel Fabian, Oluwole Fadare, Jitka Hausnerová, Jan Laco, Sigurd F Lax, Radoslav Matěj, Ivana Stružinská, Zuzana Špůrková, Barbora Weberová, Simona Stolnicu, Marián Švajdler, W Glenn McCluggage, Romana Vránková, Kristýna Němejcová","doi":"10.1007/s00428-026-04724-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Primary ovarian mucinous tumors represent a group of tumors in which the diagnosis can be difficult in some cases. The most problematic aspect is the distinction between mucinous borderline tumor (MBT) and mucinous carcinoma (MC) with expansile type of invasion. Ancillary markers to help this distinction would be beneficial, but due to the overlapping immunohistochemical and molecular features, no markers are currently widely used in this scenario. However, a recent study showed that the immunohistochemical expression of p53 with a discriminatory cut-off of 30% tumor cells with strong nuclear expression can be used as a surrogate, but this finding has not been validated in an independent series of ovarian mucinous tumors. In our study, we analyzed 181 ovarian mucinous tumors (MBT, MC or equivocal), focusing on the practical significance of p53 expression in differential diagnosis, including assessment of the value of the proposed 30% strong expression cut-off. Of the tumors included in the study, 23/109 (21.1%) cases of MBT, 42/60 (70%) cases of MC, and 8/12 (66.7%) of mucinous tumors classified as equivocal (overlap between MBT and MC) showed an abnormal p53 staining pattern, including cases with expression in ≥ 30% of tumor cells, cases with complete negativity, and cases with abnormal cytoplasmic staining. In conclusion, the results of our study confirm that p53 immunohistochemical staining can be of practical use in the differential diagnosis of ovarian mucinous tumors. Our receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses demonstrated that although cut-offs lower than 30% yielded slightly higher overall discriminatory performance, the predefined ≥ 30% threshold provided substantially higher specificity, which is likely more relevant in routine diagnostic practice. In the setting of morphologically equivocal ovarian mucinous tumors, higher specificity may reduce the risk of overdiagnosing MBT as MC, while still identifying a substantial subset of malignant tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-026-04724-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Primary ovarian mucinous tumors represent a group of tumors in which the diagnosis can be difficult in some cases. The most problematic aspect is the distinction between mucinous borderline tumor (MBT) and mucinous carcinoma (MC) with expansile type of invasion. Ancillary markers to help this distinction would be beneficial, but due to the overlapping immunohistochemical and molecular features, no markers are currently widely used in this scenario. However, a recent study showed that the immunohistochemical expression of p53 with a discriminatory cut-off of 30% tumor cells with strong nuclear expression can be used as a surrogate, but this finding has not been validated in an independent series of ovarian mucinous tumors. In our study, we analyzed 181 ovarian mucinous tumors (MBT, MC or equivocal), focusing on the practical significance of p53 expression in differential diagnosis, including assessment of the value of the proposed 30% strong expression cut-off. Of the tumors included in the study, 23/109 (21.1%) cases of MBT, 42/60 (70%) cases of MC, and 8/12 (66.7%) of mucinous tumors classified as equivocal (overlap between MBT and MC) showed an abnormal p53 staining pattern, including cases with expression in ≥ 30% of tumor cells, cases with complete negativity, and cases with abnormal cytoplasmic staining. In conclusion, the results of our study confirm that p53 immunohistochemical staining can be of practical use in the differential diagnosis of ovarian mucinous tumors. Our receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses demonstrated that although cut-offs lower than 30% yielded slightly higher overall discriminatory performance, the predefined ≥ 30% threshold provided substantially higher specificity, which is likely more relevant in routine diagnostic practice. In the setting of morphologically equivocal ovarian mucinous tumors, higher specificity may reduce the risk of overdiagnosing MBT as MC, while still identifying a substantial subset of malignant tumors.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.